The Laws of the Universe

[yy2bggggs]

The subject is so vast we could talk for ever.
This discussion, there are others of course, on the electron concept may interest you: < http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?isbn=1581126018 >.
I will finish here as I do not want the question of a fundamental particle to hijack the thread.

I'm not sure it would. I read the first chapter... not too impressed at all. It sounds like a dead end. Thanks for the discussion though.

 

[Theophage]

Maatorc, if your ideas are correct, why are they not mainstream physics? Have you submitted these ideas to the appropriate journals? Is there a conspiracy against you?

 

[maatorc]

Maatorc, if your ideas are correct, why are they not mainstream physics? Have you submitted these ideas to the appropriate journals? Is there a conspiracy against you?

I take it you mean the electron as the sole universal particle.
Mainstream physics accepts QM as the correct perception of a general universal physics. This, as in the past, will unfold into other models, on which subject see, for example, "Science And Sanity" by Korzybski.
The electron concept is not new in physics discussions, with "The Final Theory" by McCutcheon being a recent addition to the literature. It is also at the heart of occult anatomy, where, contrary to common orthodox material viewpoints, the true human 'self'-'psyche'-'soul' is understood as a mental body consisting of material electrons.
There is no conspiracy, merely a current supremacy of QM in orthodox thinking which will change as human perceptions unfold to other perspectives. Among other things, general thinking and orthodox science will probably move beyond the notion that 'psychic' can only mean 'stage magic' and 'cold reading'.

 

[Theophage]

So your haven't submitted your ideas to physics journals then? How are they going to become mainstream if they aren't submitted? Is someone else going to do it for you?

I am glad that you don't see it as a conspiracy against you. But then how could it be if you've never submitted your ideas? You should get on that.

 

[Dancing David]

http://www.thefinaltheory.com/

We all depend on science to help us understand
our world and our place within it, but if science
itself veers down the wrong path it takes all of
us along with it -- off course, often for centuries.
The Final Theory shows this has actually
occurred, starting with Newton and accelerating
with Einstein, taking us centuries off course. As
a result we now have a science of dark matter,
dark energy, time travel, parallel universes,
10 dimensions, virtual particles, several theories
of gravity, and on it goes with no end in sight.

http://www.thefinaltheory.com/scienceflaws.html

Q: But don't we know all about the gravity of Black
Holes and how even light can't escape?

A: No. This often-repeated error is based on a clear oversight.
Black Holes are said to form when a star expends its nuclear
energy and physically collapses. But starlight only shines from
intact, functioning stars, of course. There is no more reason to
expect light to shine from Black Holes than from a burnt-out,
smashed light bulb. This is a commonly repeated error in
plain view that is intended to showcase and dramatize our
scientists' deep understanding of Black Holes and gravity, but
which actually exposes how little is truly understood about
either.

 

[Theophage]

That is awesome, Dancing David! Final Theory indeed...

Edited to Add:

Oh wait! This one is priceless:

Q: How can a fridge magnet cling against gravity
endlessly without draining a power source?

A: It can't ... fridge magnets are impossible according to
today's science.