Barry Jenning's death

RedIbis said:
We might agree on that. We can, however, let his record stand and leave his family alone. His descriptions are now part of the larger record. They in themselves don't prove anything, just one man's experiences.

What I do take issue with is that whenever someone does something untoward when trying to investigate the events of 9/11, they are labeled, and therefore associated with anyone else who questions 9/11.

This has been my point all along. You have to admit that Twoofer, Truther, etc are thrown around here much too loosely, soley for the purpose of guilt by association. If you were to lose the ability to employ that pejorative, you would have to see your opponents as individuals, actual people and not be able to so easily depersonalize the situation.
Click to expand...

Vicsims: the ultimate word in depersonalization.

Tell me Red do you buy into that word?
 
TruthersLie said:
Red.

If you believe that the US government was responsible for the deaths of 3,000 individuals either through LIHOP or even worse MIHOP, then you can be labeled and grouped with other individuals who share those views.

Within the truther umbrella you have no planers, CD advocates, thermite, nanothermite and DEW.

You are still falling under the umbrella of a truther because you share the similar starting point.

Now if you have specific EVIDENCE to support your position other than badly datamined quotes, reading into statements or other BS please feel free to present it. So far, it walks like a duck, it quacks like a duck, and it sure as hell smells like a duck.
Click to expand...

Weren't you the one who said this?:

all truthers are ghouls
Click to expand...

So much for your attempt at rationality.
 
RedIbis- do you believe that 9-11 could have been an inside job?

yes? then you are a truther.
 
RedIbis said:
... you would have to see your opponents as individuals, actual people and not be able to so easily depersonalize the situation.
Click to expand...

Now apply this same philosophy to Larry Silverstein and Richard Meyers, think about the slanderous things you've said about them on this forum, and then perhaps take your hypocritical idiocy and go away.
 
johnny karate said:
Now apply this same philosophy to Larry Silverstein and Richard Meyers, think about the slanderous things you've said about them on this forum, and then perhaps take your hypocritical idiocy and go away.
Click to expand...

I've been very specific in my criticisms of both those men. I don't see them as part of any monolithic entity.
 
timmyg said:
the BBC absolutely twisted what he said!! the chronology of his story was rearranged.

So it is your opinion that there is no need to report on his death, and this isn't unusual? 'the small but paranoid world of the truth movement' is large enough for the BBC to want to do a documentary on the issue. Reporters usually want to report on things a lot of people will be interested in.
Click to expand...

You are a liar sir.
 
RedIbis said:
I've been very specific in my criticisms of both those men. I don't see them as part of any monolithic entity.
Click to expand...

As was T.A.M. very specific in his criticisms of certain Truthers before you claimed he was making a generalization. Interesting how you are able to see this distinction only when it applies to you. It's almost as if you're just an intellectually dishonest hypocrite manufacturing things to whine about.
 
What is supposed to be so mysterious about his death anyway? The fact that another person doesn't want to have anything to do with Dylan Avery? How is that in anyway a mystery?

Maybe Dylan needs to put aside his delusions of grandeur and realize that being a lying douche doesn't necessarily endear people to wanting to deal with you. The PI probably decided to do some digging on Dylan and realized anything he did would be spun into complete paranoid nonsense and didn't want to be associated with it. "Wally Miller won't talk to us". I wonder why...
 
there is nothong mysterious about his death. the cause of death was not announced by the media, because he was not an important person.

if I died tomorow, the reasons would not be released on CNN.

truthers just think he was important because of his appearance in their stupid-ass movie. but for the rest of the world, he was just an average Joe.
 
jmh423 said:
Exactly!! Move along....nothing to see here...
Click to expand...
Which is exactly the point
.Maybe if Jennings had kept his mouth shut he'd still be alive...
Click to expand...
Can you attach any evidence that this would be the case? Any evidence beyond personal disbelief based solely on incredulous coincidence?
.I think we should be more like the critical thinking skeptics like most of our JREF brethren.
Click to expand...
yes "we" should, Instead of invading a family's privacy when turned away by that family, by attempting to hire a private investigator on the basis of incredulity alone, Perhaps some evidence first?
Trust your government and news agencies. And stay out of trouble. Thank you..
Click to expand...
And what did "the government" or "news agencies" say about Barry Jennings death? Anything? Anything at all?
 
RedIbis said:
Weren't you the one who said this?:



So much for your attempt at rationality.
Click to expand...

so much for you presenting ANY evidence. Just like a twoof.

smells like a duck, looks like a duck, sounds like a duck.... Hence... it is a duck.

So much for your answering a quesiton instead of just dodging while pissing on and ******** on the dead from 9/11...
 
RedIbis said:
We might agree on that. We can, however, let his record stand and leave his family alone. His descriptions are now part of the larger record. They in themselves don't prove anything, just one man's experiences.

What I do take issue with is that whenever someone does something untoward when trying to investigate the events of 9/11, they are labeled, and therefore associated with anyone else who questions 9/11.

This has been my point all along. You have to admit that Twoofer, Truther, etc are thrown around here much too loosely, soley for the purpose of guilt by association. If you were to lose the ability to employ that pejorative, you would have to see your opponents as individuals, actual people and not be able to so easily depersonalize the situation.
Click to expand...

1. Agreed. What he said, correct or not, is forever in the record as is. He is no longer here to defend or ammend it. He, his memory, and his family, should all be left alone.

2. I personally use the term "truther" as a label of convenience. I mean no offense by it other then I oppose the views that most "truthers" hold. As well, you need to understand that MY definition of truther is someone who is ACTIVELY trying to promote or defend the theories put forth by a leaders of, or a substantial portion of, those who believe 9/11 was orchestrated by elements within the USG/NWO etc...Someone who is legitimately undecided, or simply has doubts, is not, IMO, a truther.

2. We have so few members who I consider "just asking questions" or "undecided", that to be honest, the label "truther" fits most people here who debate/discuss from the other side of the argument.

I think there are terms such as "twoofer" and "Duhbunker" which are purposely meant to insult.

The problem is the term "truther" was actually coined by the 9/11 truth activists themselves. It is derogatory now, only because the majority of people feel their ideas and theories to be the heights of ridiculousness.

TAM:)
 
9-11 Truthers invented the term "truther".

that said, it is ok for us to call them "truthers".
 
triforcharity said:
Ok, then yes, it was set up as a triage IIRC. I never recall it being a morgue.
Click to expand...

Triage! That's the word I was looking for. Thanks for that.

So that accounts for some of Mr Jennings' account of what happened that day.

What was the other "controversial" thing he said? IIRC it was something about being in the stair well inside WTC7 and hearing/feeling a masive explosion. He said that this happened before the towers collapsed, but I think most people here assume that he was understandably confused about the exact time and sequence of these events.

So, according to some Truthtards, Mr Jennings was subsequently bumped off by the evil NWO for spilling the beans.... Makes you wonder why Larry Silverstein can get away with the whole "Pull it" business without the NWO giving him a great big myocardial infarction of his very own...
 
Last edited:
why is Alex Jones still alive?

why is Dylan Avery still alive?

Why is Steven Jones still alive?

why are allll the people trying to bring us "da truth"...still alive??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom