VisionFromFeeling Formerly Alenara

I had shared those things privately, and not publicly, because they are private matters.

And apparently in speeches given to groups of people, none of whom could be expected to treat your words as confidential communications.


Shared privately? On the internet? Oh my.

And apparently in speeches to groups of people.


Well, because you are going through great lengths in prying into my personal life.

In talking about stuff he found on the internet?
 
First you say you have shared your physics ideas with scientists, and they agree with them
but today the same things apply very well within optical physics and what bits I do share about today do not seem crazy at all to scientists.


Then you said, you've never shared them with anyone, so you don't know if any scientists agree.

Can I name one person with scientific knowledge with whom I have shared my ideas? No.



An undergraduate student should know to keep their best ideas to themselves until they have their Ph.D. I will begin my research work in a few years from now, and if they lead to any new and useful discoveries we'll just have to see about that.

This is ridiculous. You do not need to wait until you are a phd to do research and get credit for it. No one will "steal" your idea. This is an excuse that quacks hide behind so they don't have to expose their crazy ideas to criticism.

If you know things about physics no one else knows you have 2 options:

1.) Use amazing physics abilities to construct simple test that can be done at home with basic equipment. If you have 700$ for plane tickets, you can buy an oscilliscope, microscope, lasers, whatever. All of physics until the 20th century was deduced from nothing more complicated than mirrors, lenses, magnets, weights, etc. (See double slit experiment which proved particle/wave duality) So if your physics ideas are so groundbreaking, they should predict observable effects. You would publish your results with your name on it.


2.) If you cannot think of a simple experiment, write out your hypothesis, the experiment you plan to do to prove or disprove it, the equipment you need, and approach a professor. If your ideas are as true as you claim, they will see that it is at least possible, and agree to let you do the research in their lab. You would publish your results with your name on it.


I have my name (behind everyone else's LOL) on an academic paper because of lab work I did in college. The researchers I worked with bent over backward to give credit to everyone who worked on the research. Another undergraduate in that lab had his own independent project that he got published.

Lots of students I know do undergraduate research and publish papers where they are the primary researcher. In fact, as admitance to some graduate programs is getting more competetive, it is almost necessary to have undergraduate publication credits.

Emily Rosa age 11 got published in the Journal of the American Medical Association for her research disproving energy healing (performed when she was 9). http://www.skeptictank.org/hs/tt2.htm

Are you incapable of doing what a 9 year old girl could do?
1.)Think of a testable, falsifyable hypothesis
2.)Test it in a blinded, repeatable manner.
3.) Share results with others so they can repeat the experiment.

So far, everything you have posted on here about physics has been dead wrong, which doesn't bode well for whatever mystery alien physics your phD thesis will be based on.
 
(Boyfriends...hee hee. After 30+ years of marriage, if I had boyfriends, I would definitely be posting that on the Internet. I'd even grab passing strangers to let them know. :D)


LOL! Ain't that the truth! I'm sure we all would act the same way. ; )
I guess if you do get one, we'll be the first to know!
 
You just flat out lie.

Oh, and since you spit on all those dozens of people to assemble your freak show at the IIG, don't you think you owe them all an apology? You do know it's a symptom of sociopathic personality disorder to treat people like crap the way you do and not have any guilt or remorse, don't you?

Have you talked with a mental health professional about... oh... wait. I read over at stopvisionfromfeeling.com that you have. And you chose to stop taking your medication. That might explain a lot of things, but it doesn't explain your inability to be honest and treat people with decency and respect.

And about that statement you promised that you've failed to support your paranormal medical BS claims so you're abandoning that nonsense, when can we expect that announcement?

Do you think just because you are ignorant, that other people don't see my continued requests for you to show a bit of honesty and integrity? :D
Well GeeMack, aren't you in a bad mood today? The IIG members were happy to tell me that yes they did work hard on setting up the test for me, but that no one did any work that they were not happy to do. I thanked them profusely and apologized for all the work involved, and they said they did not mind. I have treated the IIG members very kindly. Ask the IIG members if the way I have treated them comes across as sociopathic. What syndrome do you have, GeeMack, for making up nonsense?

You are misinformed about my medical information.

I failed the IIG test, but the claim is not falsified. There is more to learn. Three trials is too many, I do not see through large persons as easily, and these two concerns will be dealt with in a second test.

I have been entirely honest about all of this. Take it easy, GeeMack. ;)
 
You never had a heart condition, I never said I was appalled, I don't care if you post repeated references to my public statement, and I couldn't care less about your boyfriend or what you may or may not have shared about him and didn't comment on it in the first place.

Aside from that, this has what to do with you squawking about how info you posted on the Internet is private?
I did have a heart condition. What evidence supports your false assumption? Maybe if you go to France I will be there and not have a heart condition? And Bugs Bunny will be there in Disneyland too.

ETA: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4349015&postcount=1488
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4382176&postcount=1760
 
Last edited:
No, I wasn't, since you never had a heart condition.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5450634&postcount=48No, I didn't, since you never had a heart condition.

But you never had a heart condition, so your point is moot.
I had a heart condition. And you never went to Paris.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4349015&postcount=1488
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4382176&postcount=1760
 
I did have a heart condition.

Yeah, right, sure, whatever. :rolleyes:

What evidence supports your false assumption?
What evidence supports your claim that you had a heart condition? Your normal EKG?

Maybe if you go to France I will be there and not have a heart condition? And Bugs Bunny will be there in Disneyland too.

ETA: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4349015&postcount=1488
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4382176&postcount=1760
I'm not going to France. I'm sure, if you go, you will be there and not have a heart condition. And Bugs Bunny isn't a Disneyland character.

I had a heart condition.

Yeah, right, sure, whatever. :rolleyes:

I know.

What does this have to do with you squawking about how info you posted on the Internet is private?
 
Last edited:
No, Bugs Bunny belongs to Warner Bros., not Disney. It would be copyright infringement if Disney had Bugs Bunny.
That's exactly right. One of the Forum members once quoted (I can't find the quote) about a study where they told people who had just come from Disneyland about what they thought about meeting Bugs Bunny there. A portion of the people became convinced that they had seen it, but in reality none of them had.
 
What evidence supports your claim that you had a heart condition? Your normal EKG?
I had a heart condition and it was diagnosed. I will not share my medical documentation with you.

I'm not going to France. I'm sure, if you go, you will be there and not have a heart condition. And Bugs Bunny isn't a Disneyland character.
You didn't catch the pun, did you. And I'm not sure you are able to tell whether you do or do not go to France or not. Ask someone else to tell you whether you did. At least I don't go places in my mind.
 
I had a heart condition and it was diagnosed. I will not share my medical documentation with you.

Since you refuse to provide any evidence to support your claim, Heather, I will continue to assert that you never had a heart condition.

You never had a heart condition.

VisionFromFeeling said:
You didn't catch the pun, did you.

Was that a question? Look up the definition of "pun" before you attempt one. Oh, and 'Disneyland' is in Southern California.

And I'm not sure you are able to tell whether you do or do not go to France or not.
Huh? Coherent much?

Oh, and France is a country. Paris is a city. You can go to France without going to Paris. You need to learn about such distinctions, I guess.

Ask someone else to tell you whether you did.
Did what?

At least I don't go places in my mind.
Except outer space, 'Ben Franklin's' non bedroom, fictional 18th century sailing ships, non existent Revolutionary War battlefields, etc, etc. :rolleyes:

But, hey, whatever you say, Heather. :D

What does this have to do with you squawking about how info you posted on the Internet is private?
 
Last edited:
I had a heart condition and it was diagnosed. I will not share my medical documentation with you.

You didn't catch the pun, did you. And I'm not sure you are able to tell whether you do or do not go to France or not. Ask someone else to tell you whether you did. At least I don't go places in my mind.

You claim to have been sent here from Arcturus to inhabit a fetus that eventually became Anita Ikonen so I'd say you do "go places in your mind".
 
VfF, the difference between you and Desertgal is that Desertgal recognizes her previous delusions were not real. You have not yet acknowledged that any of your experiences are not real. If you were to do that, it would at least start to repair your credibility around here.
 
That's exactly right. One of the Forum members once quoted (I can't find the quote) about a study where they told people who had just come from Disneyland about what they thought about meeting Bugs Bunny there. A portion of the people became convinced that they had seen it, but in reality none of them had.

Just like people who become convinced that they saw missing kidneys before being told about them.
 

Back
Top Bottom