Richard Gage in Osaka

Mr.Herbert said:
I find it interesting that Richardless Gage has never posted this debate on his website. Don't you, billboy?
Click to expand...

I think Sir Richard is a gentleman and a Patriot and is not particularly triumphalist.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
I think Sir Richard is a gentleman and a Patriot and not particularly triumphalist.
Click to expand...

GAGE is a lying,lowlife scumbag conman who should be tied up and whipped to within an inch of his life.

gage is lower then a rattle snake.



HAPPY FESTIVUS!!!!
 
bill smith said:
I think Sir Richard is a gentleman and a Patriot and is not particularly triumphalist.
Click to expand...

If he was any kind of gentleman, he would be apologizing to the mothers that lost loved ones. If he was a patriot, why isn't he in front of the White House protesting instead of going to other countries to insight war?
 
Finally, a Truther has provided me with a couple of "smoking gun" videos conclusively and irrefutably showing that 9/11 was an Inside Job Controlled Demolition.

Either that or it's more video jiggery-pokery. I can't even work out what the first one purports to show but seems to attempt the old, "blinded by scienciness" that Truthers are renowned for comparing it to a soft-focus NIST video which they apparently claim is an example of fraudulent editing by NIST.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sI2gP7_xdA&feature=related

The same Truther should be ashamed of the second one. Does anyone know who made these?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkjvKGbaewg&feature=related
 
angrysoba said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sI2gP7_xdA&feature=related
Click to expand...

Not sure what this guy is on about, but I love how he points out in his audio graph two spikes as "thunder 1" and "thunder 2" ,when the "spikes" happen to be the reporter saying something.


The same Truther should be ashamed of the second one. Does anyone know who made these?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkjvKGbaewg&feature=related
Click to expand...

dont know but what the maker of those videos are claiming, isn't even what is happening in the video. SEcond video, he's point out the windows breaking on WTC 7 and alluding that this is due to CD. However, he conveniently leaves out that the INTERIOR of the buiolding was already collapsing, and the floor within, which are CONNECTED to the exterior was pulling inward. The bowing effect is what caused the windows to break.

if it was CD, it woulfn't be sparse windows in one area of the building. IT WOULD BE entire floor ACROSS that the windows would "break" ( however in a REAL CD, there would be no windows to beging with, they woulfd have been removed)
 
bill smith said:
I think Sir Richard is a gentleman and a Patriot and is not particularly triumphalist.
Click to expand...

I think that being a triumphalist is what drives Gage. He just doesn't have much to be triumphant about beyond his teachings to a small band of disciples.

But look at his career he was pretty much a complete loser in the architectural field, before he became the Architect of Destruction.

Now he has a small band of faithful followers that fly him around the world and wait on his words of wisdom. He speaks to the converted and they praise him.

It is the fame and the money of his movement that drives him; and to achieve that he has sacrificed fairness, honesty and truth.
 
Arus808 said:
SEcond video, he's point out the windows breaking on WTC 7 and alluding that this is due to CD. However, he conveniently leaves out that the INTERIOR of the buiolding was already collapsing, and the floor within, which are CONNECTED to the exterior was pulling inward. The bowing effect is what caused the windows to break.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkjvK...eature=related

if it was CD, it woulfn't be sparse windows in one area of the building. IT WOULD BE entire floor ACROSS that the windows would "break" ( however in a REAL CD, there would be no windows to beging with, they woulfd have been removed)
Click to expand...

According to truther wisdom the building does not start to collapse until the main facade at the top of the building starts to fail. They ignore the collapse of the penthouse and the collapse of the interior floors or the fact that the internal floors are pulling down the outside and applying energy into the perimeter wall to make the external frame a rapid failure.

If you look at the collapse the penthouse moves just before the windows below start "exploding". If it was a CD then you would expect the opposite.
And why would they explode it so high up.

Also pretty crumby explosives if they only demolish one or two windows at different levels. And since the windows don't line up then it means the explosives are on some random pattern inside and not aligned with any columns. Unlike WTC 1 and 2 where the windows were enormously strong these were not.

What I dont get is how can truthers watch this stuff and "believe".
 
bardamu said:
It's because truthers don't believe in miracles.
Click to expand...

3 sky scrapers rigged for CD without detection.

explosives which don't make any recordable noise.

explosives which don't register on seismograph.

debris which violates the law of gravity.

buildings which fall into their own footprint while simultaneously damaging other buildings.

debris and DNA from a plane, with 100+ eye witnesses seeing a plane, yet no plane.

You guys should just be saying "Yes, God came down from heaven and stopped these ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊* bullets".

Just as miraculous.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom