JoeTheJuggler
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2006
- Messages
- 27,766
Yeah--that's why I prefer to avoid the term "socialism". It's pretty loaded. For some people it only means "bad". At best it's ambiguous.I had always thought Americans viewed "socialized medicine" as a single-payer system. Or one where government-run insurance systems were mandatory and facilities were publically owned and operated.
Thank you 1950s America.
George Orwell even lists it as one of the words frequently misused this way in "Politics and the English Language" (my bolding):
Meaningless words. In certain kinds of writing, particularly in art criticism and literary criticism, it is normal to come across long passages which are almost completely lacking in meaning.
<snip>
Many political words are similarly abused. The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies "something not desirable." The words democracy, socialism, freedom, patriotic, realistic, justice have each of them several different meanings which cannot be reconciled with one another. In the case of a word like democracy, not only is there no agreed definition, but the attempt to make one is resisted from all sides. It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it: consequently the defenders of every kind of regime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using that word if it were tied down to any one meaning. Words of this kind are often used in a consciously dishonest way. That is, the person who uses them has his own private definition, but allows his hearer to think he means something quite different. Statements like Marshal Pétain was a true patriot, The Soviet press is the freest in the world, The Catholic Church is opposed to persecution, are almost always made with intent to deceive. Other words used in variable meanings, in most cases more or less dishonestly, are: class, totalitarian, science, progressive, reactionary, bourgeois, equality.
So I prefer using terms like single-payer system, universal healthcare system, and so on.
Back to the point in the OP, I would separate banning extraneous profit centers altogether from the idea of relying on them as the primary way we provide access to healthcare.