KSM Conspiracy Charges Analyzed and Debunked

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!

Then you've got nothing, right Rolf?

No evidence of nano-thermite, just the words from other nutjob that you're helping spread around to other people who are clueless in the realm of science.

 

[cyclonic]

Please put your face where your mouth is so we know you if we see you cross the road and think if your brakeworthy or not.

 

[Travis]

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!

Okay then. Prove it wasn't really anti-matter unicorns.

What's your evidence!?!

 

[Slayhamlet]

Please put your face where your mouth is so we know you if we see you cross the road and think if your brakeworthy or not.

Rolf Lindgren. If you should happen to see this man operating a motor vehicle, call the cops immediately.

 

[Galileo]

Rolf Lindgren. If you should happen to see this man operating a motor vehicle, call the cops immediately.

you gonna snitch him out? Not even the cops respect snitches. They are one notch below whale scum.



PS - That Rolf guy is quite the handsome fellow, no wonder he has so many hotties after him!

 

[Galileo]

Okay then. Prove it wasn't really anti-matter unicorns.

What's your evidence!?!

The defense can present expert witness Dr. Jeffrey Farrer to testify about the nano-thermite found at ground zero. That's all you usually need to convince a jury is one good expert witness. Juries almost always believe what scientists tell them. The prosecution has no scientist to counter Dr. Farrer, because every scientist who has tested for thermite in the WTC dust has found it.

 

[332nd]

The defense can present expert witness Dr. Jeffrey Farrer to testify about the nano-thermite found at ground zero. That's all you usually need to convince a jury is one good expert witness. Juries almost always believe what scientists tell them. The prosecution has no scientist to counter Dr. Farrer, because every scientist who has tested for thermite in the WTC dust has found it.

They could also present your evidence that the charges against KSM are false. Why won't you contact them with a link to said evidence so they can look it over?

 

[Travis]

The defense can present expert witness Dr. Jeffrey Farrer to testify about the nano-thermite found at ground zero. That's all you usually need to convince a jury is one good expert witness. Juries almost always believe what scientists tell them. The prosecution has no scientist to counter Dr. Farrer, because every scientist who has tested for thermite in the WTC dust has found it.

So you don't think other, more numerous, scientists who would testify that nano-thermite would be next to useless in trying to demolish the WTC would be ignored? You think the other scientists who could testify how mundane materials present at the WTC site which would explain the supposed presence of nano-thermite would just twiddle their thumbs and do nothing?

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

The defense can present expert witness Dr. Jeffrey Farrer to testify about the nano-thermite found at ground zero. That's all you usually need to convince a jury is one good expert witness. Juries almost always believe what scientists tell them. The prosecution has no scientist to counter Dr. Farrer, because every scientist who has tested for thermite in the WTC dust has found it.

Iron oxide isn't evidence of nano-thermite Rolf. Ever heard of paint pigments?

 

[Galileo]

Iron oxide isn't evidence of nano-thermite Rolf. Ever heard of paint pigments?

You're not an expert. You don't have an expert to say that.

 

[Galileo]

They could also present your evidence that the charges against KSM are false. Why won't you contact them with a link to said evidence so they can look it over?

You have a fixation. Please contact the defense team yourself. If they don't read my paper, that is their problem, not mine.

 

[Sam.I.Am]

The prosecution subpoenas the defense for samples of all of the dust examined by the defense witness for our own forensic examination. They also seek a credible chain of custody from collection to the present of said dust.

Defense: *crickets*

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

You're not an expert. You don't have an expert to say that.

Google it up Rolf!

Iron Oxide!

I don't need an expert to know. BTW I was a painter for 7 yrs. I would know, obviously that beer you're drinking is clouding your judgement.

http://www.asianironoxide.com/index.asp?action=product1

The surface of all kinds of building structure,such as wall,ground,ceiling,pillar,ladder,road surface,park,station and so on.

All kinds of building materials,such as brick,face brick,panel,canal,mosaic brick,man-made marble,asbestos and so on.

 

[cyclonic]

PS - That Rolf guy is quite the handsome fellow, no wonder he has so many hotties after him!

So why is he a drunk then? closet homosexual?
Reminds me of JOHN WAYNE GACEY if he had a lower IQ.

 

[Galileo]

So you don't think other, more numerous, scientists who would testify that nano-thermite would be next to useless in trying to demolish the WTC would be ignored? You think the other scientists who could testify how mundane materials present at the WTC site which would explain the supposed presence of nano-thermite would just twiddle their thumbs and do nothing?

No such scientists exist.

 

[332nd]

You have a fixation. Please contact the defense team yourself.

Why? I didn't write the paper, I believe that KSM is guilty, and I think your paper is simply idiotic ramblings. In short I wouldn't want to waste their time.

YOU however have claimed at least partial authorship of the paper, YOU think KSM is innocent, and YOU think your paper debunks the charges against KSM.

If they don't read my paper, that is their problem, not mine.

I would say it is KSM's problem. Why won't you help him?

 

[Galileo]

The prosecution subpoenas the defense for samples of all of the dust examined by the defense witness for our own forensic examination. They also seek a credible chain of custody from collection to the present of said dust.

Defense: *crickets*

The chain of custody is easy to prove as Dr. Farrer and Dr. Jones have witnesses for that. Also, since nano-thermite is high tech, it could not have accidentally got in the dust.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

No such scientists exist.

Rolf, can you explain the high concentraitions of iron oxide in the paint, man-made marble, asbestos which were inside the Towers?

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

The chain of custody is easy to prove as Dr. Farrer and Dr. Jones have witnesses for that. Also, since nano-thermite is high tech, it could not have accidentally got in the dust.

But Dr. Farrer and Dr. Jones can't get any "nano-thermite" to compare it with the dust sample they have.

So you've come to the end of your lonely road of delusions.

 

[Galileo]

Rolf, can you explain the high concentraitions of iron oxide in the paint, man-made marble, asbestos which were inside the Towers?

Dr. Farrer can. He is the expert witness. You are sunk if he gets on the stand.