Why don't we just come clean about Global Warming?

[Hallo Alfie]

What I want to know, is will it be a two party system?

 

[Dr Adequate]

I'm still hung up on the One World Government angle.

We're talking about a treaty here.

So when the American government settled accounts with the Indians and made treaties with them, were these steps towards One World Government?
What about the Paris Convention of 1883? The Convention on International Civil Aviation?

What about the United States of America? A sinister step towards one world government, don't we think?

 

[Marduk]

How come?
What is wrong with a global government?

The Galactic Emperor wouldn't like it

 

[SezMe]

But now it looks like it was all untrue.

What changed your mind?

 

[Oliver]

Why don't we just come clean about Global Warming?

Because this issue is based on "scientific facts in progress". But since we know that CO² is bad for the environment, we should rather analyze scientific evidence than denying the fact that CO² is a problem...

 

[Dancing David]

But now it looks like it was all untrue.

There are multiple converging lines of data to say that the global temperature seems to be rising. When did they suddenly get overturned?

Did they get new data on lake sediments, tree rings and ice cores?

The thing about the one world government, priceless.

 

[Dancing David]

What I want to know, is will it be a two party system?

One of the goals of the NWO is to have many more parties than that, you have to have circuses to go with the bread.

 

[Oliver]

One of the goals of the NWO is to have many more parties than that, you have to have circuses to go with the bread.

Actually - AFAIK - the NWO is all about a single-party system, and in case of the US that pretty much seems to be in place already...

 

[Arcade22]

Well, if that is the point of the whole Global Warming hysteria, then i am against it.

I sure as hell don't want to be ruled by the hated Norwegians, or any other country for that matter.

 

[Oliver]

Well, if that is the point of the whole Global Warming hysteria, then i am against it.

I sure as hell don't want to be ruled by the hated Norwegians, or any other country for that matter.

I do not want to get ruled by anyone. But I personally prefer to have professional, scientific evidence than just a bunch of people who rather believe in Politicians than in Scientists.

 

[Upchurch]

I do not want to get ruled by anyone. But I personally prefer to have professional, scientific evidence than just a bunch of people who rather believe in Politicians than in Scientists.

It's a shame we don't also have a wall of separation between science and state, as well.

 

[Drysdale]

Because this issue is based on "scientific facts in progress". But since we know that CO² is bad for the environment, we should rather analyze scientific evidence than denying the fact that CO² is a problem...

Alright, I've gotta call on this. Why is CO² bad for the environment exactly?
Does'nt vegetation and other varied life depend on CO²?

 

[Oliver]

Alright, I've gotta call on this. Why is CO² bad for the environment exactly?
Does'nt vegetation and other varied life depend on CO²?

It does ... as long there is a balanced amount of CO². However, if there is too much CO² it is pretty much as bad as too less CO²:

See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co2#Toxicity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide_poisoning

 

[Lurker]

I sure as hell don't want to be ruled by the hated Norwegians, or any other country for that matter.

As a Finn, I agree that Norse rule would be bad but it would only be worse under the dreaded Swedes.

 

[Oliver]

It's a shame we don't also have a wall of separation between science and state, as well.

Well, according to a Google-Privacy-Expert who also happens to be half-German like almost 20% of US citizens, he says that Germans are most skeptical about businesses - while Americans tend to be most skeptical about Governments. And science in America is being viewed as a governmental issue rather than the European view that Science is a non-governmental issue. Maybe that differing POV explains a lot about the different cultural opinions about Science.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Because this issue is based on "scientific facts in progress". But since we know that CO² is bad for the environment…

No, we do not “know” this. In fact, CO² is vital for life as we know it. If all the CO² were removed from the atmosphere, nearly all green plants would die off, followed closely by us.

Your statement makes about as much sense as saying something like “We know that the Earth is flat.”

 

[Upchurch]

Your statement makes about as much sense as saying something like “We know that the Earth is flat.”

How about his clarification? Does that make more sense?

 

[Praktik]

Hey - remember when we found out about the hole in the ozone layer in the 80s and all the nations of the world came together to combat CFCs via treaty - and then we all were enslaved under One World Government?

Geez I wish we coulda just ignored the hole in the ozone layer, I'd trade this one world government for some skin cancer any day!

 

[GreyICE]

Hey - remember when we found out about the hole in the ozone layer in the 80s and all the nations of the world came together to combat CFCs via treaty - and then we all were enslaved under One World Government?

Geez I wish we coulda just ignored the hole in the ozone layer, I'd trade this one world government for some skin cancer any day!

I admire the effort, but it's a tad Don Quixote, and this windmill is excessively dense.

 

[PogoPedant]

As a Finn, I agree that Norse rule would be bad but it would only be worse under the dreaded Swedes.

Hey now! I'm quite sure even the simple Finnish people would thrive under the sure hand of faint King Harald V.

Us Norwegians have never ruled anything and it's about time we got to try our hand at dominion!