KSM Conspiracy Charges Analyzed and Debunked

[Galileo]

You have no respect for the judges decision.

If KSM's innocent, then please present a paper from the judge that he is innocent.

BTW: You claiming that he's innocent proves that you Truthers are Terrorist Sympathizers.

Let me remind you Galileo:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/21925



Do you have something to add Galileo?

I wasn't planning on attending.

But the advice given in this column is moronic.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

I wasn't planning on attending.

Bt the advice given in this column is moronic.

You wasn't planning on attending but yet you claim KSM is "innocent". That makes you a terrorist sympathizer!

Kind of like the moronic statements you've made so far? Good job!

 

[TexasJack]

It is the same thing as innocent. You are presumed innocent and the jury agreed.

Thank you for showing your ignorance of the terms, not guilty does not equal innocent.

 

[Galileo]

You wasn't planning on attending but yet you claim KSM is "innocent". That makes you a terrorist sympathizer!

Kind of like the moronic statements you've made so far? Good job!

KSM is innocent, not a terrorist.

 

[Galileo]

Thank you for showing your ignorance of the terms, not guilty does not equal innocent.

You show your ignorance. OJ was presumed innocent before the trial, and now that he won, he is presumed innocent after the trial.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

KSM is innocent, not a terrorist.

Oh really?

Then can you explain how he's the uncle of Ramzi Yousef who was found guilty for planning the 1993 WTC Bombing?

You really haven't connected the dots to anything, have you?

 

[Galileo]

Oh really?

Then can you explain how he's the uncle of Ramzi Yousef who was found guilty for planning the 1993 WTC Bombing?

You really haven't connected the dots to anything, have you?

Who gives a rats ass what his uncle did? You are judged by what you do, not your uncle.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Who gives a rats ass what his uncle did? You are judged by what you do, not your uncle.

Looks like you give a rats patootie what he did!

Did I say that his uncle was responsible for the 93 Bombing? Nope! All I said that he was the uncle of Ramzi Yousef.

Here's a picture showing simularities between Yousef & Mohammed (Typo: nephew is what I meant):

 

[Galileo]

Did I say that his uncle was responsible for the 93 Bombing? Nope! All I said that he was the uncle of Ramzi Yousef.

Here's a picture showing simularities between Yousef & Mohammed (Typo: nephew is what I meant):

dude, take off the stupid hat. KSM's uncle is not mentioned on the charge sheet.

Do you know that KSM is presumed innocent?

That means all actions in the charge sheet should be interpretted in an innocent manner, withoput proof to the contrary.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

dude, take off the stupid hat. KSM's uncle is not mentioned on the charge sheet.

Do you know that KSM is presumed innocent?

That means all actions in the charge sheet should be interpretted in an innocent manner, withoput proof to the contrary.

LOL @ Galileo! Since when did I state that KSM had an uncle? NEVER!

He's not presumed innocent. Show me a paper where it states that!

You've got proof to the contrary?

FYI: I see that you like sticking your foot in your mouth constantly. Better wash those socks!

 

[Galileo]

LOL @ Galileo! Since when did I state that KSM had an uncle? NEVER!

He's not presumed innocent. Show me a paper where it states that!

You've got proof to the contrary?

FYI: I see that you like sticking your foot in your mouth constantly. Better wash those socks!

Do you have any intelligent comments on the charge sheet?

 

[332nd]

I'm surprised to hear you would associate with Muslims.

Why wouldn't I?

KSM is innocent, not a terrorist.

So are you going to send the defense team a link to your debunking?

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Do you have any intelligent comments on the charge sheet?

Show me the paper that says he's innocent!

Now prove to me that you're intelligent!

 

[Galileo]

Why wouldn't I?

Because you accuse innocent Arabs of terrorism.

So are you going to send the defense team a link to your debunking?

I wrote an article oj the Internet, your logic doesn't follow.

Do you have any intelligent comments about the article?

 

[Galileo]

Show me the paper that says he's innocent!

Now prove to me that you're intelligent!

Show me you have 8th grade reading skills and make a comment about the actual article.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Show me you have 8th grade reading skills and make a comment about the actual article.

If you can't show us the paper stating that KSM is innocent, then you've got no case to prove that he is.

I rest my case!

 

[Galileo]

If you can't show us the paper stating that KSM is innocent, then you've got no case to prove that he is.

I rest my case!

The paper says he is presumed innocent. Please get ahold of yourself.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

The paper says he is presumed innocent. Please get ahold of yourself.

Provide a link to prove his innocence Galileo.

So far you've shown that you're: ignorant, arrogant, illogical, stubborn, can't provide any facts to your claims, fail to show paper proving his innocence, & trolling.

Here's a quote just for you:

The pleasures of ignorance are as great, in their way, as the pleasures of knowledge. ~Aldous Huxley

Galileo falls under the "Ignoranus Category": A person who's both stupid and an a-hole.

 

[Macgyver1968]

Holy crap! Is that your car Rolf? Or is that just a stock image of a drunk driving wreck? If it's yours...you can thank your lucky starts to have your head still on your shoulders!

 

[A W Smith]

http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm89/AWSmith1955/drunk-driver.jpg

Holy crap! Is that your car Rolf? Or is that just a stock image of a drunk driving wreck? If it's yours...you can thank your lucky starts to have your head still on your shoulders!

So far iv'e seen no evidence of that.