KSM Conspiracy Charges Analyzed and Debunked

[Sword_Of_Truth]

OJ Simpson was innocent.

Is there a wife-beater you won't stand up for?

 

[A W Smith]

any publicity is good publicity.

If you can show that filing a restraining order and then having a spouse arrested was done for "good publicity" then drinks are on my Rolf


http://thetruncheon.blogspot.com/

 

[A W Smith]

Is there a wife-beater you won't stand up for?

OJ wasn't a wife beater, He was a wife slitter throaterer

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

Next he's gonna say..."well how many jews did Hitler PERSONALLY gas or shoot?"

You're confusing Kevin Barrett with his "friend" and campaign manager.

Mr. Lindgren here has yet to deny the Nazi genocides of the 1940s like Kevin Barrett has.

It's an easy mistake to make though.

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

OJ wasn't a wife beater, He was a wife slitter throaterer

The double murder of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown was the culmination of a long string of abuse O.J. carried out against his wife.

 

[A W Smith]

The double murder of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown was the culmination of a long string of abuse O.J. carried out against his wife.

You know i was gonna put a smiley sarcasm disclaimer at the end of that statement. but I thought it would be inappropriate given the absolute horror of the crime scene.

 

[dudalb]

You're confusing Kevin Barrett with his "friend" and campaign manager.

Mr. Lindgren here has yet to deny the Nazi genocides of the 1940s like Kevin Barrett has.

It's an easy mistake to make though.

And I would bet that before too much time passes our buddy Galileo will jump on board the Holocaust Denial train.

 

[TexasJack]

OJ Simpson was innocent.

bad example.

OJ was found not guilty, which is not the same as innocent. He was found guilty in a civil court.

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

You know i was gonna put a smiley sarcasm disclaimer at the end of that statement. but I thought it would be inappropriate given the absolute horror of the crime scene.

It's easy to end up taking things too literally in this sub-forum.

 

[Galileo]

The double murder of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown was the culmination of a long string of abuse O.J. carried out against his wife.

Wrong. The jury cleared OJ of the charges.

 

[Galileo]

OJ was found not guilty, which is not the same as innocent. He was found guilty in a civil court.

It is the same thing as innocent. You are presumed innocent and the jury agreed.

 

[Galileo]

And I would bet that before too much time passes our buddy Galileo will jump on board the Holocaust Denial train.

Bush and the neocons are a bunch of nazis.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Hey Galileo,

You're forgetting that Johnny Cockran used something simular to the "Chewbacca Defense".

So what you say doesn't make sense!

Bush and the neocons are a bunch of nazis.

Bush is no longer President. You've got no case!

 

[carlitos]

Bush and the neocons are a bunch of nazis.

How many years will the Democrats have to control both Houses and the Presidency before this statement stops cluttering our interwebs???

 

[Newtons Bit]

How many years will the Democrats have to control both Houses and the Presidency before this statement stops cluttering our interwebs???

Don't worry, the Democrats will become the new Nazis by the time that happens. Republicans will have morphed into super-Nazis!

 

[Sam.I.Am]

No, the jury wasn't shown a lot of the evidence because of some very crafty legal maneuvering by OJ's "Dream Team" of lawyers. From what I recall, the jurors that stepped forward a few weeks after the trial all said that they would've found him guilty if they were allowed to see and hear all of the testimony that was withheld from them at trial but was available to the general public via newspapers and television.

 

[Galileo]

No, the jury wasn't shown a lot of the evidence because of some very crafty legal maneuvering by OJ's "Dream Team" of lawyers. From what I recall, the jurors that stepped forward a few weeks after the trial all said that they would've found him guilty if they were allowed to see and hear all of the testimony that was withheld from them at trial but was available to the general public via newspapers and television.

Wrong. The jurors found him guilty quickly, and the evidence of the real killer was never presented.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Wrong. The jurors found him guilty quickly, and the evidence of the real killer was never presented.

Prove that he was found guilty Galileo, find a paper from the jury that said he was guilty.

Burden of proof is on you!

 

[Galileo]

Prove that he was found guilty Galileo, find a paper from the jury that said he was guilty.

Burden of proof is on you!

You have no respect for jury verdicts.

KSM is innocent.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

You have no respect for jury verdicts.

KSM is innocent.

You have no respect for the judges decision.

If KSM's innocent, then please present a paper from the judge that he is innocent.

BTW: You claiming that he's innocent proves that you Truthers are Terrorist Sympathizers.

Let me remind you Galileo:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/21925

I see many people calling for action at the KSM trial. But has anyone really thought about the ramifications of showing up at the KSM trial with "9/11 Was an Inside Job" signs? The Department of Homeland Security has been trying to label 9/11 truthers as terrorists for a couple years now. What will happen if a single 9/11 truth sign shows up at the trial and even hints that KSM is innocent?

It doesn't matter if KSM is really innocent or not. The government has labeled him a terrorist and is putting that terrorist on trial in a public court for the whole world to see. If any 9/11 truth signs show up at that trial, that will be the final nail in the coffin for 9/11 truth. We will be labeled as terrorist sympathizers, terrorist supporters, or homegrown terrorists. DHS would love nothing more than to see 9/11 truth signs flying around at that trial so that they can finally start rounding up the only real voice that threatens whatever agenda the criminals in our government are trying to attain.

There's even the possibility that "agents" could pose as 9/11 truthers to obtain the same goal of painting us as terrorists or terrorist supporters.

I would say not to go anywhere near that trial. There are plenty of ways to get 9/11 truth out, but not at the trial of someone the government has labeled a terrorist and not with the chance of the government finally being able to label 9/11 truthers as terrorists or terrorist supporters just because we were there.

Do you have something to add Galileo?