• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Split Thread 'Nose-out' footage

Do not make sockpuppet allegations. If you suspect a sockpuppet, report them and provide evidence.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Tricky
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dtugg said:
Edited by Tricky: 
Removed quote of modded post.
Click to expand...

actually, its only 11:10 and I don't work tomorow. I'm in the mood for a good smack down.

do you have a link to info about the FBI identifying the plane parts and connecting them with the known hijacked airliners at the WTC?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Algebra34 said:
Yes I do believe most likely that planes hit the towers.
Click to expand...

Then why are you cheerleading for a no-planer for? You did read his posts, correct? Or you just taking his side because it is the opposite of everbody elses?
 
Plus DNA from passangers known to be on board AA11 and UA175. To any sane person, this positively IDs which planes hit the WTC.
 
dtugg said:
Plus DNA from passangers known to be on board AA11 and UA175. To any sane person, this positively IDs which planes hit the WTC.
Click to expand...

that DNA could have been planted. didn't you read the memo about the new TPS reports?

;)
 
TexasJack said:
Then why are you cheerleading for a no-planer for? You did read his posts, correct? Or you just taking his side because it is the opposite of everbody elses?
Click to expand...

Did he claim absolutely no planes? Because I thought he was discussing a possible swap. Which hasn't been debunked. Maybe I got it wrong.

In any case maybe there were no planes. If the wreckage was never identified or offered up after the fact then who is to say?

But I'm not a no planer. It just doesn't sound like a plan to me to have no planes at all and then after the fact just pretend planes hit the towers. Especially two strikes at different times at the same location. Who would green light such a plan and not think there would be a hundred cameras on the supposed second strike?
 
Algebra34 said:
No it doesn't. You should no this by now debunker.
Click to expand...

I said to sane people...

How does your condition have you explain it away, HI? Perhaps their remains magically teleported from the planes they were on (which were coincidently never seen again) to the same place where there happened to be two plane crashes. Makes perfect sense. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
well, ya see, the supposedly hijacked planes landed at a super-secret govt. airstrip, where the passengers were taken off the commercial plane and put on a super-secret remote controlled Mossad jet, which was then flown into the towers and the Pentagon.

there is no actual evidence of this, but it would make a great Tom Clancy novel, so it must be true.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom