You expect Simon Shack to use the Hezerkhani video in his analysis of the Chopper 5 shot?
Oh you are just limiting it to the chopper 5 shot? Why is that? I mean with dozens of video images of a jet (clearly a passenger jet) striking the tower, why limit it to one grainy, out of focus, highly zoomed shot from a distance away?
Why do that?
I have clearly shown you video showing there is no nose in, nose out. All three clearly show the impact of 175. The Nose in/Engine Out video clearly shows what happened.
Why do you no planers take bad out of focus, massively zoomed images and then try to spin an argument while ignoring all of the rest of the video images?
I've already shown you that Lawson doesn't know his subject.
Lawson clearly and utterly destroys simonshack. He points out the lies and deceptions of the no brainers... oops, I mean no planers.
If it's not clear which pictures are ejected debris and which are the nose of a 767, it kind of does prove the point.
Yes it proves the point that if you take fuzzy, out of focus, highly zoomed video and then compress it to examine it you will see almost whatever you want... I'm sure we could find bigfoot in that footage somewhere if we tried hard enough... just stand back from your computer, squint your left eye and hop on one foot.
There are currently 535 signatures on the petition.
http://www.petitiononline.com/Video911/petition.html
Oh so there aer 535 people out of a country of 300 million (and a world population of over 5 BILLION. so let me do the math on the ... oh **** it... that is less than one tenth of one hundredths of one percent. yea... wow... with numbers like that one day you might just be relevant... in like 3050