...Richard Gage destroyed by Kim Hill

[332nd]

That is the sweet sound of sincerity you are hearing Alienentity.

How so?

 

[bill smith]

Wow I went to the Kim Hill website. the link to the Richard Gage part doesn't seem to be working though. lol

http://www.radionz.co.nz/search?mode=results&queries_all_query=richard+gage

 

[T.A.M.]

oooh it must be a conspiracy bill...cause ther is no way it is simply a technical issue.

TAM

 

[bardamu]

Does that include his claim that CNN announced the collapse of 7 at 10:45 AM?

Gage saying it happened at 6 hours before it did indicates he's an idiot

This indicates you're not aware of the earlier CNN report.

At 11:07 a CNN correspondent at the scene reported that another building had gone down at 10:45. Gage is suggesting that Building 7 may have been scheduled for demolition soon after the North Tower was demolished, before the dust had cleared. If that's the case, both the original script and the revised script were given out prematurely.

At a quarter to eleven there was another collapse or explosion following the 10:30 collapse of the second tower, and a firefighter who rushed by us estimated that 50 storeys went down.

youtube.com/watch?v=9_E6RhuEQu4

(add the www)

 

[Miragememories]

"I was a bit shocked at how many plain wrong or misleading things Gage spewed in his programmed spiel."

Funny.

A similar response can be had by watching;
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzTGMQcXP1Q

Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7GWYK5AMKY

And when presented with contradictory evidence, the author of the above pseudo-docs fled to this sanctuary of shared beliefs.

Typically weak debunking by spinning the easy questions while studiously ignoring the tough ones.

MM

 

[ElMondoHummus]

If that's the case, both the original script and the revised script were given out prematurely.

What script?

 

[A W Smith]

Funny.

A similar response can be had by watching;
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzTGMQcXP1Q

Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7GWYK5AMKY

And when presented with contradictory evidence, the author of the above pseudo-docs fled to this sanctuary of shared beliefs.

Typically weak debunking by spinning the easy questions while studiously ignoring the tough ones.

MM

What tough ones merry melodies? the ones like. "the towers collapsed at freefall acceleration as fast as the debris did" ?? like this?

http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/educational/watch/v16415132HnA38zEp

 

[bill smith]

This indicates you're not aware of the earlier CNN report.

At 11:07 a CNN correspondent at the scene reported that another building had gone down at 10:45. Gage is suggesting that Building 7 may have been scheduled for demolition soon after the North Tower was demolished, before the dust had cleared. If that's the case, both the original script and the revised script were given out prematurely.



youtube.com/watch?v=9_E6RhuEQu4

(add the www)

I especially like this clip of yours. Pretty good predicting wasn't it ?

 

[bill smith]

Funny.

A similar response can be had by watching;
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzTGMQcXP1Q

Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7GWYK5AMKY

And when presented with contradictory evidence, the author of the above pseudo-docs fled to this sanctuary of shared beliefs.

Typically weak debunking by spinning the easy questions while studiously ignoring the tough ones.

MM

Aw now it just wouldn't be right just to show Alienentity's video wothout showing a clip of the real audio. The other clip gives a small idea of the amount of people who reported heavy-duty explosions live on 9/11. Plenty more available on request.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsoWbX6hCYk&NR=1 Naudet audio WTC2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw explosion witnesses 13m hits

PS. Another look at verinage. In verinage the structure underneath is weakened, then a critical somponent is removed using winches or cables allowing the upper intact block to fall and act as a pulveriser for the lower weakened section. (As seen in the attached clip) Hear the concrtete grind as the upper block nears down after removel of the critical component that was supporting it..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prwvj-npt5s grinding concrete

 

[Algebra34]

I especially like this clip of yours. Pretty good predicting wasn't it ?

This is amazing Bill. I asked the debunkers if the news reports were independent or not. None of them answered right away. Some debunker then claimed they all got their info from the Fire Department. Really? They both got the wrong info from the Fire Department that the building already fell? Another Debunker then claims that both CNN and the mighty BBC just parrot Reuters. Oh really? So? Where did Reuters get their bad info from? The Fire Department? Friggin Hilarious. Either way. It's nonsense that the debunkers cling to. But I'll need to give them a chance. I'm sure now there is a brand new explanations.

 

[bill smith]

This is amazing Bill. I asked the debunkers if the news reports were independent or not. None of them answered right away. Some debunker then claimed they all got their info from the Fire Department. Really? They both got the wrong info from the Fire Department that the building already fell? Another Debunker then claims that both CNN and the mighty BBC just parrot Reuters. Oh really? So? Where did Reuters get their bad info from? The Fire Department? Friggin Hilarious. Either way. It's nonsense that the debunkers cling to. But I'll need to give them a chance. I'm sure now there is a brand new explanations.

Mistakes--terrible shock--never happened before--lessons learned--lol

 

[Athyrio]

I know people being interviewed often get tongue-tied, but Gage was truly grasping for words in several places there. At 18:55 he says "we have something in Western Civilization called laws of momentum, Newton's Laws". So - those laws don't apply anywhere else?

And at 26:48 where she begins to ask him why after 8 years have none of the conspirators come forth to admit their culpability he says, "we don't know if they have - we don't know if they would still be alive". Exactly what is he implying here? If they had, we would have known it. Does he mean to say all of the conspirators have already been eliminated? If not, how would those responsible for 9/11 know which ones to eliminate before they spill the beans? Isn't it logical for a whistleblower to sound the whistle before they let the people they are ratting out know they are about to do so? How can he say "we don't know if they have" and then avoid admitting he is a conspiracy theorist?

95% of architects and engineers across the world agree? Where can this poll be found?

I love it when truthers are confronted with the linear thinking of their conspiratorial ideas like Hill did with the Bin Laden videos.

Every time he responded with "I'm an architect", I kept thinking George Costanza.

 

[Algebra34]

Mistakes--terrible shock--never happened before--lessons learned--lol

You said it brother. Just don't forget coincidence. 9/11 = "Coincidence Day". Just think, another day off from work. I'm gonna right my Congressman and start the drive. God Bless America.

 

[Algebra34]

I know people being interviewed often get tongue-tied, but Gage was truly grasping for words in several places there. At 18:55 he says "we have something in Western Civilization called laws of momentum, Newton's Laws". So - those laws don't apply anywhere else?

And at 26:48 where she begins to ask him why after 8 years have none of the conspirators come forth to admit their culpability he says, "we don't know if they have - we don't know if they would still be alive". Exactly what is he implying here? If they had, we would have known it. Does he mean to say all of the conspirators have already been eliminated? If not, how would those responsible for 9/11 know which ones to eliminate before they spill the beans? Isn't it logical for a whistleblower to sound the whistle before they let the people they are ratting out know they are about to do so? How can he say "we don't know if they have" and then avoid admitting he is a conspiracy theorist?

95% of architects and engineers across the world agree? Where can this poll be found?

I love it when truthers are confronted with the linear thinking of their conspiratorial ideas like Hill did with the Bin Laden videos.

Every time he responded with "I'm an architect", I kept thinking George Costanza.

Seriously Björn. After 8 years why are debunkers still so rabid about attacking 9/11 conspiracy? In fact if it's all really dead then why did Gage get on the show in the first place? Who would be interested? It's not debunkers keeping 9/11 truth alive is it?

BTW I also thought it was hillarious the one time he spurts out "I'm an architect" underneath her beligerant steamroller delivery. I busted a gut on that one. My wife was asking me what is wrong. I think she thought I was having a heart attack. For real.

 

[bill smith]

I know people being interviewed often get tongue-tied, but Gage was truly grasping for words in several places there. At 18:55 he says "we have something in Western Civilization called laws of momentum, Newton's Laws". So - those laws don't apply anywhere else?

And at 26:48 where she begins to ask him why after 8 years have none of the conspirators come forth to admit their culpability he says, "we don't know if they have - we don't know if they would still be alive". Exactly what is he implying here? If they had, we would have known it. Does he mean to say all of the conspirators have already been eliminated? If not, how would those responsible for 9/11 know which ones to eliminate before they spill the beans? Isn't it logical for a whistleblower to sound the whistle before they let the people they are ratting out know they are about to do so? How can he say "we don't know if they have" and then avoid admitting he is a conspiracy theorist?

95% of architects and engineers across the world agree? Where can this poll be found?

I love it when truthers are confronted with the linear thinking of their conspiratorial ideas like Hill did with the Bin Laden videos.

Every time he responded with "I'm an architect", I kept thinking George Costanza.

Lol. The only angle Kim did not try (amazingly) was 'were the firemen in on it ' She even brpught ip the gold for God's sake. Absolutely hilarious and a resounding victory for the Truth Movement. No error. .

 

[bill smith]

You said it brother. Just don't forget coincidence. 9/11 = "Coincidence Day". Just think, another day off from work. I'm gonna right my Congressman and start the drive. God Bless America.

9/11 was the coincidence X-files/

 

[twinstead]

Bill do you really think Gage would fare very well with an interviewer who was able to show the idiocy of the conspiracy theory on a very basic level (like Kim) AND was as familiar with his 'evidence' as some folks here are? All I heard from Gage was talking points that I have personally seen debunked, both on this forum and in real life. Jesus he claims that it is a proven fact thermite was found in the dust, re Jones. At the very BEST the claim is hotly disputed. Why present it as fact when it is not even close?

You and the other resident truthers gloss over Gages hyperbole, half-truths and out-and-out lies. I'm sure Gage thanks you for that.

 

[Algebra34]

Lol. The only angle Kim did not try (amazingly) was 'were the firemen in on it ' She even brpught ip the gold for God's sake. Absolutely hilarious and a resounding victory for the Truth Movement. No error. .

It was even in all it's hilarity. This is what debunkers support and promote. Ignorance and belligerence. The whole interview was so ironic it was classic. I love it. I hope she keeps spouting her stupid mouth off about 9/11. The only thing that would be better would be if the mainstream became aware of this place. We would definitely get a new investigation then.

 

[Algebra34]

Bill do you really think Gage would fare very well with an interviewer who was able to show the idiocy of the conspiracy theory on a very basic level (like Kim) AND was as familiar with his 'evidence' as some folks here are? All I heard from Gage was talking points that I have personally seen debunked, both on this forum and in real life. Jesus he claims that it is a proven fact thermite was found in the dust, re Jones. At the very BEST the claim is hotly disputed. Why present it as fact when it is not even close?

You and the other resident truthers gloss over Gages hyperbole, half-truths and out-and-out lies. I'm sure Gage thanks you for that.

How could any interviewer own Gage when your tour guide couldn't? This is your problem. Keep being belligerent. It's all you got. Unfortunately for you it's not working.

 

[cyclonic]

Lol. The only angle Kim did not try (amazingly) was 'were the firemen in on it ' She even brpught ip the gold for God's sake. Absolutely hilarious and a resounding victory for the Truth Movement. No error. .

Victory for the truth movement? lol.

the only thing the truth movement has ever got right is the date: 9/11.


the gold must have melted and mixed with the pools of molten steel and then vanished hey bill.