• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

...Richard Gage destroyed by Kim Hill

banquetbear

Graduate Poster
banquetbear
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
1,765
...Kim Hill (IMHO) is one of the world best interviewers and when she is on the attack there is absolutely noone better. I once heard her reduce a confident tobacco industry spokesman to a blithering idiot by simply asking the question "why?" (The spokesman was explaining new initiatives they had undertaken to make smoking less appealing to youngsters: Kim asked why, which put the spokesman on the back foot. You had to have heard it... )

Unfortunately Richard Gage has graced New Zealand with his presence: and he was on National Radio with Kim this morning. Direct links to the broadcast are below: (hopefully listenable outside of NZ!)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Hill_(broadcaster)

http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/saturday/20091121

http://podcast.radionz.co.nz/sat/sat-20091121-0910-Richard_Gage_architecture_of_destruction-048.mp3

Unfortunately I can't link to the some of her follow ups as she reads emails and texts from listeners: which were pretty funny!
 
How many such interviewers does New Zealand have? That was amazing. She kept him on point. She's going to get a lot of truther email - the nasty kind. She dropped the boxes on his head.
 
WTF, Gage claims the towers were only half occupied, "white elephants" as he called them? :eek:
 
I don't follow this 9/11 truther stuff much at all to be honest. I watched in horror the planes crash, I saw with breaking heart people jumping, with disbelief the towers collapse and I saw the world react.
Listening to Richard Gage in this interview has me convinced there is some high level conspiracy going on.

Not!

Is he the best they have to offer?
 
A.A.Alfie said:
I don't follow this 9/11 truther stuff much at all to be honest. I watched in horror the planes crash, I saw with breaking heart people jumping, with disbelief the towers collapse and I saw the world react.
Listening to Richard Gage in this interview has me convinced there is some high level conspiracy going on.

Not!

Is he the best they have to offer?
Click to expand...

Yes
 
She actually started off a little weak. Loose Change crap.

She got him to admit that the Osama Bin Laden's video was falsified. Props for that!

She got him to give in to the BBC 20 min crap as well.

HAHAHAHAHA the Kevin McPadden count down... then pimps his friggin website and DVD.

When Is someone going to tell Gage that Jones backed away from the nanothermite?

LMFAO @ failed Cessna School!!!
LMFAO @ alive hijackers
LMFAO @ remote controlled airplanes

Ugh...more loose change crap.

LMFAO @ Silverstein
LMFAO @ stock options
LMFAO @ him kissing Griffins ASS further.
LMFAO @ elevator shafts and implicating ACE elevator.... A little libel there????
LMFAO @ Gages lack of knowledge of gravity.
LMFAO @ Squibs



HAHAHAHAH she is funny.....

Kim: "You're starting to sound like Dan Brown."

Dick: " I don't know Dan Brown."

:dl:


Dick: "YOU'RE NOT DEALING WITH IT KIM!" hahahahaha she pissed him off there.

Hilarious!

Gage: "I don't know, I'm not a conspiracy theorist." Sweet jesus that was fresh.
 
Last edited:
It's awful nice of the AE911T faithful to fund Mr. Gage's vacations to New Zealand. I'd be jealous, except I don't take blood money.

Good on her.
 
R.Mackey said:
It's awful nice of the AE911T faithful to fund Mr. Gage's vacations to New Zealand. I'd be jealous, except I don't take blood money.

Good on her.
Click to expand...

He also had a bit of a stay here in Australia. I saw him smiling at me as my friend approached him with a camera rolling, but his expression turned to confusion as we totally ignored him and instead spoke to Luke Rudkowski.

Anyway Mackey I think you should get together with one or two of the other Engineers on this site (maybe Architect as well)take a year off from your real jobs and start your own world lecture tour bringing the truth about 9/11 to the confused public.

You could use the same marketing tricks as the Truthers and perhaps even word your ads a bit ambiguously so as to attract the conspiranoid crowd, but then when you have them in a theatre you could explain all of the actual evidence and the plain and simple truth that destroys all of the inside job fantasies.

I see a big poster saying "THE TRUTH ABOUT 9/11!!!!". If the nutters buy tickets hoping to hear about nano-thermite and missiles at the Pentagon, that's their problem...

You might want to change the name of the tour for each city, as eventually even the Truthers might start to wake up to what you are doing. Maybe...
 
banquetbear said:
...Kim Hill (IMHO) is one of the world best interviewers and when she is on the attack there is absolutely noone better. I once heard her reduce a confident tobacco industry spokesman to a blithering idiot by simply asking the question "why?" (The spokesman was explaining new initiatives they had undertaken to make smoking less appealing to youngsters: Kim asked why, which put the spokesman on the back foot. You had to have heard it... )

Unfortunately Richard Gage has graced New Zealand with his presence: and he was on National Radio with Kim this morning. Direct links to the broadcast are below: (hopefully listenable outside of NZ!)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Hill_(broadcaster)

http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/saturday/20091121

http://podcast.radionz.co.nz/sat/sat-20091121-0910-Richard_Gage_architecture_of_destruction-048.mp3

Unfortunately I can't link to the some of her follow ups as she reads emails and texts from listeners: which were pretty funny!
Click to expand...

This woman didn't even know the difference between the towers and building 7. Hillarious. What a setup. And that was SOME intro. Not even a little bias there huh? Just about anything gets you guys giddy don't it?
 
Actually, that makes the point very well. Ms. Hill is not extraordinarily well versed in Truther lore, yet she still is able to recognize it for the steaming pile it is on contact.

This is why our work here is done, and those of us "debunking" can stand down. People really aren't quite as stupid as the Truthers hoped.
 
I can't wait to listen and to add to www.911debates.com! Yeah Richard Gage is the best they have and he just says the same stuff at DRG. Props to him for taking on debates and stuff, unlike DRG.
 
Richard Gage seems a lot like Kent Hovind the way he makes stuff up and keeps coming up with already debunked claims from 6-7 years ago.

Tony makes Gage look dumb, I'd love to see Mackey debate Gage. lol
 
R.Mackey said:
Actually, that makes the point very well. Ms. Hill is not extraordinarily well versed in Truther lore, yet she still is able to recognize it for the steaming pile it is on contact.

This is why our work here is done, and those of us "debunking" can stand down. People really aren't quite as stupid as the Truthers hoped.
Click to expand...

Your work is done? Did you clock out already? Could have fooled me. Don't you have anywhere else to go?

That woman knew nothing about 9/11. Funny you're a fan.
 
if I hear him say "extrememly high tech stuff" one more time i'll slap somebody (preferably Gage himself). :boggled:
 
I liked how he had to back into a complete no claimer position after starting off with his usual high speed spiel.

Still he did manage to get lots of plugs in for the tour and his DVD sales so I suppose it can be seen as a successful interview from his point of view.As long as it gets a few more dollars in the kitty it serves his main aim.
 
I don't know where to start...

"I'm not a conspiracy theorist". "95% of Architects agree with us". "We deal with it by not looking squarely at the evidence of a controlled demolition".

I'll just let the interview stand on its own. She did destroy him IMO.
 
I love the stuttering bit from 14:41 - 14:47. I think that sums up Gages' intellectual ability. :D
 
Last edited:
I'm about 15 minutes in.

Yeah Hill started off kind of weak with her first argument.

For Gage's agenda, he started off pretty strong. He sounded a lot more confident than when I saw him against Gravy or when I heard his debate against Ron Craig. Of course he is still repeating the same arguments that he said in those debates years ago.

He went on about how the micro spheres at GZ, is he still citing the RJ Lee paper as support for his claim that those micro spheres should not have been at GZ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom