Bigfoot Hunter at it again

Status
Not open for further replies.
Apology said:
If this guy Biscardi has a Bigfoot hand in a jar, why doesn't he turn it over for DNA analysis? Seems like he could solve this whole debate really quickly. Heck, they could just snip a little tissue off the wrist and he could keep the rest of the hand, so it's not like he'd even lose anything!

As a matter of fact, I think he should explain where he got the hand, and prove that it isn't human, just to rule out foul play...
Click to expand...

Because it is a bear paw and he is a hoaxer.
 
makaya325 said:
Why do you take the word of Biscardi, who is a fraud, to support your notion that people look for bigfoot every second?
Click to expand...

Does anyone know where I can get a picture of Jeff Dunham's Peanut doing the move that made him famous? If you know the one I'm talking about.
 
makaya325 said:
Why do you take the word of Biscardi, who is a fraud, to support your notion that people look for bigfoot every second?
Click to expand...

Strawman. And I havnt seen GT take the word of Tom biscardi so far, are we reading the same thread? Are you just in a bad mood this week and spoiling for a fight?
 
makaya325 said:
People have been looking for bigfoot for quite a while, but not seriously and thoroughly.
Click to expand...

How many unsuccessful okapi expeditions were there prior to the species' discovery by westerners?

This is why comparisons between the search for bigfoot and the relatively recent descriptions of other large mammals are invalid. In every other case (gorilla, okapi, etc.), the species was found and described once we got into their remote habitats and started looking for them.

This is simply not true for bigfoot. Not only have "western" prospectors, surveyors, soldiers, trappers, foresters, etc. - each group with the ability to have bagged one and saved at least a piece - been active within the reported range of these things for centuries with no evidence forthcoming, people actively and purposely looking for them have come up short as well. Consider folks like Krantz, Green, Bindernagel, Fahrenbach, Byrne, Meldrum, and yes, the Biscardis and Moneymakers too. How many collective years of searching has even just this short list of researchers invested in this fairy tale?
 
On the topic of Bigfoot, I recently read Fragile Things by Neil Gaiman in it he mentions this origin of the word "Yeti"

"...And on the subject of naming animals, can I just say how happy I was to discover that the word yeti, literally translated, apparently means "that thing over there." ("Quick, brave Himalayan Guide--what's that thing over there?"..."yeti"..."I see.")
Click to expand...

I love Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett.

I can't believe there are actually people in the world that call themselves cryptozoologists. But, hey, everyone has to have a hobby I guess. At least it gets them out in the fresh air. :D
 
William Parcher said:
If you Google Longtabber PE, you will find this.

Pretending to have seen Bigfoot? Sure, I don't see why not.
Click to expand...

I'm going to beat this dead horse one more time. Makaya, what you see above is the value of research. In another bigfoot thread you were mentioning LT and several of us suggested you do some research relative to him but you didn't. Research is your friend especially when discussing the many aspects of Bigfoot and the people involved.
 
The Shrike said:
How many unsuccessful okapi expeditions were there prior to the species' discovery by westerners?

This is why comparisons between the search for bigfoot and the relatively recent descriptions of other large mammals are invalid. In every other case (gorilla, okapi, etc.), the species was found and described once we got into their remote habitats and started looking for them.

This is simply not true for bigfoot. Not only have "western" prospectors, surveyors, soldiers, trappers, foresters, etc. - each group with the ability to have bagged one and saved at least a piece - been active within the reported range of these things for centuries with no evidence forthcoming, people actively and purposely looking for them have come up short as well. Consider folks like Krantz, Green, Bindernagel, Fahrenbach, Byrne, Meldrum, and yes, the Biscardis and Moneymakers too. How many collective years of searching has even just this short list of researchers invested in this fairy tale?
Click to expand...

Name me five BIG, serious, fully-funded bigfoot expeditions.
 
Audible Click said:
I'm going to beat this dead horse one more time. Makaya, what you see above is the value of research. In another bigfoot thread you were mentioning LT and several of us suggested you do some research relative to him but you didn't. Research is your friend especially when discussing the many aspects of Bigfoot and the people involved.
Click to expand...

I did find LT's name on Bullshido, discussed by Joey Donuts
 
makaya325 said:
I did find LT's name on Bullshido, discussed by Joey Donuts
Click to expand...

If you had read carefully you would have found one more bit of info that would have led you to a final bit of evidence. It's not just research that counts, it's thorough research. OK enough said, by me, anyway.
 
GT/CS said:
First we need to define, 'fully funded'. What do you mean by that?
Click to expand...

No, first we can just ask "why?" Is he implying that it takes at least 5, big, fully-funded, blah blah blah to find a "cryptid?" It didn't take 5 such expeditions to find gorillas and okapis. Heck, we found coelocanths without even looking for them.
 
The Shrike said:
No, first we can just ask "why?" Is he implying that it takes at least 5, big, fully-funded, blah blah blah to find a "cryptid?" It didn't take 5 such expeditions to find gorillas and okapis. Heck, we found coelocanths without even looking for them.
Click to expand...

But this is Mak so first he needs to define his ambiguous words.
 
GT/CS said:
But this is Mak so first he needs to define his ambiguous words.
Click to expand...

Oh, let's just simply figure that Mak, as always, offered a statement that he can't back up, and wants to deflect that by trying to turn the tables. It's just easier.

Once a troll, always a troll.
 
Those yet-to-happen, mega-thorough, and big money searches deep into the PNW are going to turn up more than Bigfoot. That's where the remnant herds of Mastodons are located.
 
William Parcher said:
Those yet-to-happen, mega-thorough, and big money searches deep into the PNW are going to turn up more than Bigfoot. That's where the remnant herds of Mastodons are located.
Click to expand...

Maybe they'll also find D.W. Cooper, and get a return on their money. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom