• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

9/11-investigator explains the Holocaust

Status
Not open for further replies.
Use your common sense.

Where have I heard that before ?

Ah, yes. From people with no evidence. Now, I remember. Because you think that your armchair analysis is better than evidence. Of course, you pretty much have to:

1) You don't have evidence
2) You believe you can't be wrong
3) Therefore, you must be smarter than everyone else by being able to reach a conclusion WITHOUT evidence!
 
Hoess wrote his memoirs while under Polish custody -- then I guess his memoirs were not under duress and can be considered legit.

If you give people initially a brutal treatment you can later extract anything from them by merely threatening to apply force again. I haven't read the memoirs nor will I anytime soon.
 
You are aware that supposedly people were gassed there as well, like I believe in the 10,000 range? In that 'administrative camp'.

Small scale, I believe it was when it was still in the experimental stage.

Yes, I am painting with a broad brush (speaking in general terms) -- do I need to add a disclamer?
 
This is the tally of all the documents of registered deaths in possession of the Red Cross. And that's it. That's the holocaust for you.

Wow. And ALL those historians and investigators missed that. You're so awesome.

Tell me, 9/11, do you believe that EVERY person who disagrees with you is in on this jewish conspiracy ? Or are they just incompetent ? Note that I'm not making an argument from popularity or authority. I'm askin you a direct question.
 
Where have I heard that before ?

Ah, yes. From people with no evidence. Now, I remember. Because you think that your armchair analysis is better than evidence. Of course, you pretty much have to:

1) You don't have evidence
2) You believe you can't be wrong
3) Therefore, you must be smarter than everyone else by being able to reach a conclusion WITHOUT evidence!

So far it is mainly me producing the original documents. Like this one:

http://i40.tinypic.com/xfzfc.jpg
Volume 13 of the Nuremberg Military Tribunal (NMT) publications, document NG-2586-J, a memo by Martin Luther on August 21, 1942 about the Jewish policy of the Reich mentions nothing about extermination; point number 8:

"On the occasion of a reception by the Reich Foreign Minister on 26 November 1941 the Bulgarian Foreign Minister Popoff touched on the problem of according like treatment to the Jews of European nationalities and pointed out the difficulties that the Bulgarians had in the application of their Jewish laws to Jews of foreign nationality."
"The Reich Foreign Minister answered that he thought this question brought by Mr. Popoff not uninteresting. Even now he could say one thing to him, that at the end of the war all Jews would have to leave Europe. This was the unalterable decision of the Fuehrer and also the only way to master this problem, as only a global and comprehensive solution could be applied and individual measures would not help very much."


---------------

Franz Rademacher, Head of AA Referat D III (Jewish Affairs), to Harold Bielfeld, Head of AA Pol. X (Africa and Colonial Affairs), February 10, 1942

In August 1940 I gave you for your files the plan for the final solution of the Jewish Problem, drafted by my office, for which purpose the Madagascar Island was to be demanded from France in the Peace Treaty, while the Reich Security Main Office was to be charged with the actual execution of the task.

In accordance with the plan, Gruppenführer Heydrich has been ordered by the Führer to carry out the solution of the Jewish Problem in Europe. In the meantime the war against the Soviet Union has offered the possibility of putting other territories at our disposal for the final solution.

The Führer accordingly has decided that the Jews shall not be deported to Madagascar but to the East. Therefore it is no longer necessary that Madagascar be taken into consideration for the final solution.

Source:
Akten zur Deutschen Auswärtigen Politik 1918-1945, Series E, vol. I, p. 403. Herbert A. Strauss, General Editor, "Jewish Immigrants of the Nazi Period in the USA" Vol. 4 - Jewish Emigration from Germany 1933-1942: A Documentary History

-------------------

Conclusion: everything points towards deportation as an official policy.
 
If you give people initially a brutal treatment you can later extract anything from them by merely threatening to apply force again. I haven't read the memoirs nor will I anytime soon.

The basis for the brutal treatment allegation is limited to the first few days when Hoess refused to admit who he was. You do realize that right?

Pictures of him at that time show a tired man.
 
Wow. And ALL those historians and investigators missed that. You're so awesome.

No, they just know when to shut up:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,455726,00.html

Who wants to endure this? Only the true heroes. People like Germar Rudolf (recently released after a 3 year sentence), Zundel and Mahler (still in jail, 5 + 7 years), Töben (to be released next week from some Australian dungeon), Graf in exile in Moscow and the list continues.

Tell me, 9/11, do you believe that EVERY person who disagrees with you is in on this jewish conspiracy ? Or are they just incompetent ? Note that I'm not making an argument from popularity or authority. I'm askin you a direct question.

No, just uninterested, lazy, cowardly, dumb, wanting a comfortable life as accepted part of the crowd.

How many dissidents were there during Soviets times, even after Stalin? A handfull. Most people are not born for heroism, they just want their peace and they say what the people in power want to hear. There is no conspiracy, just conformism and obedience to law and accepted norms.
 
So far it is mainly me producing the original documents. Like this one:

http://i40.tinypic.com/xfzfc.jpg
Volume 13 of the Nuremberg Military Tribunal (NMT) publications, document NG-2586-J, a memo by Martin Luther on August 21, 1942 about the Jewish policy of the Reich mentions nothing about extermination; point number 8:

"On the occasion of a reception by the Reich Foreign Minister on 26 November 1941 the Bulgarian Foreign Minister Popoff touched on the problem of according like treatment to the Jews of European nationalities and pointed out the difficulties that the Bulgarians had in the application of their Jewish laws to Jews of foreign nationality."
"The Reich Foreign Minister answered that he thought this question brought by Mr. Popoff not uninteresting. Even now he could say one thing to him, that at the end of the war all Jews would have to leave Europe. This was the unalterable decision of the Fuehrer and also the only way to master this problem, as only a global and comprehensive solution could be applied and individual measures would not help very much."

The Bulgarians, while allied with Germany, did not support them in their war against the Soviets (in fact, didn't Bulgaria even keep their embassy open?) and did not support the German polcies against Jews -- do you think this was written with the knowledge of the audience that would see it?
 
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n4p-4_Graf.html

Interesting article. There is more than just the 8,000 Parisian Jews mentioned earlier:

In 1942 Jews from Belgium, Netherlands and France arrived by train in Lvov (Lviv), Ukraine, according to testimony of the eyewitness I. Hertz provided in 1946 by the Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee of the USSR.[note 28]

28. The Jewish Black Book Comm., The Black Book: The Nazi Crime Against the Jewish People (New York: 1946), pp. 198, 531 (n. 228). Cited in: E. Aynat, Estudios sobre el "Holocausto" (cited above), p. 58.
 
Another gem from those evil Germans:

http://www.cwporter.com/SCAN 40/beeld-214.jpg

1937. Document contains a warning to all those camp commandants who want to mistreat the prisoners. An SS-man who did so was degraded. A simple box on the ear is considered 'full mistreatment'.

Completely at odds with the general pictured delivered to us by the likes of Spielberg.

It's odd how all your links seem to come from the same website.

Are you sure you actually are investigating any of this ?
 
So you admit it lasted for no more than the first few days, when Hoess was in violation of the Geneva Convention by not admitting who he was?

Possibly, I don't know. Why not take this Draper character who did the beasting by his word? Or Hoess himself who confides that 'he couldn't take it anymore'.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom