9/11-investigator explains the Holocaust

[9/11-investigator]

So... when did Krege visit the camps? Funny as to how there is no evidence that he did? You'd expect him to have plenty of evidences of his presence there, if only for tax purposes (receipts, photographs, actual print-out from the radars...)
Strange how he always refused to produce any of that, just as if it was all made up!

1999. Watch the video, listen to the interview.

 

[Nonpareil]

1999. Watch the video, listen to the interview.

Did. He doesn't present anything to prove that he was there. Isn't there somewhere on the internet, that great repository of human knowledge, where any of the findings of his study should be available? Somewhere where he published his findings? Photos?

 

[9/11-investigator]

I am going to weed out some minors here, they take too much time and offer no substance: Kurse and Pure_Argent on the ignore.

 

[Toke]

Amazing, you are down to "they don't look like killers" and "of course he investigated it, he say so himself".

It the interview contained anything else, I am sure you would mention it.

 

[Kurse]

I am going to weed out some minors here, they take too much time and offer no substance: Kurse and Pure_Argent on the ignore.

Ahw, because you can't beat an argument? =[

Can't stand the heat, get off the mountain. BECAUSE WE ARE THE FRIKKEN SUN BABY!!!

So he submits. =/
Can someone post this so that he can see it? Even though he ignores me? lmao

 

[Toke]

Ahw, because you can't beat an argument? =[

Can't stand the heat, get off the mountain. BECAUSE WE ARE THE FRIKKEN SUN BABY!!!

So he submits. =/
Can someone post this so that he can see it? Even though he ignores me? lmao

Sure.

 

[Nonpareil]

I am going to weed out some minors here, they take too much time and offer no substance: Kurse and Pure_Argent on the ignore.

Well, if anyone's willing to quote this post so that 9/11-investigator can see it, I'd appreciate it.

9/11-investigator, if you were actually able to deal with what I posted you wouldn't be needing to put me on ignore. I have shown time and again that your case against the Holocaust is baseless, that you lie through your teeth and simply repeat tired old denier nonsense that has been debunked over and over again. I've shown you why you're wrong, time and time again.
I'm not going to be leaving this thread. I will continue to respond to your nonsense, even if you can't see me. I will continue to debunk your bull, if for no other reason than to make myself feel like I'm doing something. And it's painfully apparent to everyone here that you are only putting me on ignore because you don't want to have to deal with the responses that I use to completely destroy your arguments.
You have no case. You have no evidence. You have nothing but bare assertion, lies, antisemitism, paranoia and argument ad hominem. Keep posting your nonsense. I think most of the people here find it entertaining.

To everyone else, feel free to use any of the stuff I post from now on. Or you could quote me. Whichever.

 

[Matthew Ellard]

Just go to google and type in 'Hoess Wolzek'.

It's not that difficult.

http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/othercamps/hoess.html

The Fuhrer ordered the solution of the Jewish question in Europe. A few so called Vernichtungslager are existing in the General Government.

* Belzec near Rawa Ruska Ost Polen
* Treblinka near Malkinia on the River Bug
* Wolzek near Lublin**

Wolzek is a non-existing camp.

Camp "Wolzek" is Sobibor. Hoess, in his descriptions of the camps does not use the word Sobibor but uses the word "Wolzek". In addition, if the Bristish were torturing Nazis to make up fake camp names, why has only one used "Wolzek"?

 

[Kurse]

Sure.

I love you.
Completely conditionally.
But seriously, you rock .

 

[Matthew Ellard]

Mr. Krege's planned "The Krege Report. Ground Penetrating Radar Research at the Operation Reinhardt Camps Treblinka, Belzec, and Sobibor, " has not seen the light of day due to the fact that all productions at THESIS&DISSERTATIONS PRESS have completely halted due to GERMAR RUDOLF'S imprisonment in Germany.

Krege is an Australian. He can print his report tomorrow. We have different laws. That's why "Spycatcher" was published in Australia despite it having a "D-Notice" on publication in the UK. German laws have no control here either. Krege simply doesn't want to be "peer reviewed" by qualified forensic scientists. End of story.

 

[Uzzy]

I am going to weed out some minors here, they take too much time and offer no substance: Kurse and Pure_Argent on the ignore.

So they win the argument, right?

 

[Toke]

Well, if anyone's willing to quote this post so that 9/11-investigator can see it, I'd appreciate it.

9/11-investigator, if you were actually able to deal with what I posted you wouldn't be needing to put me on ignore. I have shown time and again that your case against the Holocaust is baseless, that you lie through your teeth and simply repeat tired old denier nonsense that has been debunked over and over again. I've shown you why you're wrong, time and time again.
I'm not going to be leaving this thread. I will continue to respond to your nonsense, even if you can't see me. I will continue to debunk your bull, if for no other reason than to make myself feel like I'm doing something. And it's painfully apparent to everyone here that you are only putting me on ignore because you don't want to have to deal with the responses that I use to completely destroy your arguments.
You have no case. You have no evidence. You have nothing but bare assertion, lies, antisemitism, paranoia and argument ad hominem. Keep posting your nonsense. I think most of the people here find it entertaining.

To everyone else, feel free to use any of the stuff I post from now on. Or you could quote me. Whichever.

Here you go.
And yes, I will make use of your information.

 

[Toke]

Krege is an Australian. He can print his report tomorrow. We have different laws. That's why "Spycatcher" was published in Australia despite it having a "D-Notice" on publication in the UK. German laws have no control here either. Krege simply doesn't want to be "peer reviewed" by qualified forensic scientists. End of story.

You are accusing mr. Krege of being less than honest about his work?

 

[Matthew Ellard]

So they win the argument, right?

That seems to be the case. Kurse and Pure_Argent have won the argument so 9/11-investigator is hiding from them.

 

[Kurse]

That seems to be the case. Kurse and Pure_Argent have won the argument so 9/11-investigator is hiding from them.

Likely going to have some warning or suspensions waiting for me later, but it was for a good cause. lol

 

[9/11-investigator]

Camp "Wolzek" is Sobibor. Hoess, in his descriptions of the camps does not use the word Sobibor but uses the word "Wolzek". In addition, if the Bristish were torturing Nazis to make up fake camp names, why has only one used "Wolzek"?

You are parotting the footnote that the link produces:

** Wolzek – unknown location, probably Sobibor in the Lublin district.


Nothing links Sobibor to 'Wolzek' as far as I know. Any material to back this up?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sobibor_extermination_camp

 

[9/11-investigator]

I thought you did not trust Russian sources -- oh wait, I see, when they say something you like, its trustworthy, when you do not like what they say, you ignore it.

Now we see how it works.

Kind of like putting your fingers in your ears when the big kids pick on you

So ok, lets say you found several thousand French Jews -- still about 5,992,000 to go

Source, besides Radio Moscow:

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n4p-4_Graf.html#95554
The French Communist underground newspaper Notre Voix reported in its April 1944 issue.
29. Facsimile reproduction in: J.-M. Boisdefeu, La Controverse sur L'extermination des juifs par les Allemands (cited above), Tome II, p. 86.

(This is about the amazing fact that 8,000 Parisian Jews were liberated in the Ukraine. According to the official story all the Jews were transported to so-called extermination camps in Poland. Here is proof that Jews were relocated indeed into the newly concquered territories. This is total at odds with holocaust orthodoxy).


From the same article:

Factual or documentary proof for a German policy to exterminate Europe's Jews, or for the existence of homicidal gas chambers, simply does not exist. On the contrary, the huge amount of wartime German documents not only provides no proof for the existence of an extermination policy, they point to the contrary. To cite just one example: German wartime documents in the archives of the Auschwitz State Museum in Poland show that 15,706 wartime camp prisoners, nearly all of them Jewish, received medical care at the hospital of the Auschwitz III (Monowitz) camp between July 1942 and June 1944. Of these prisoners, 766 died in the hospital, while the rest of them were released.[note 2] This fact simply doesn't square with an extermination policy.

2. Panstwowe Muzeum w Oswiecimiu (Auschwitz State Museum archives), Syg. DAuI-III-5/1, 5/2, 5/3, 5/4.

 

[Nonpareil]

Source, besides Radio Moscow:

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n4p-4_Graf.html#95554
The French Communist underground newspaper Notre Voix reported in its April 1944 issue.
29. Facsimile reproduction in: J.-M. Boisdefeu, La Controverse sur L'extermination des juifs par les Allemands (cited above), Tome II, p. 86.


From the same article:

Factual or documentary proof for a German policy to exterminate Europe's Jews, or for the existence of homicidal gas chambers, simply does not exist. On the contrary, the huge amount of wartime German documents not only provides no proof for the existence of an extermination policy, they point to the contrary. To cite just one example: German wartime documents in the archives of the Auschwitz State Museum in Poland show that 15,706 wartime camp prisoners, nearly all of them Jewish, received medical care at the hospital of the Auschwitz III (Monowitz) camp between July 1942 and June 1944. Of these prisoners, 766 died in the hospital, while the rest of them were released.[note 2] This fact simply doesn't square with an extermination policy.

The IHR is not a reliable source. It suffers from confirmation bias, chronic bare assertion syndrome and the occasional attack of pure fabrications.

 

[Kurse]

German wartime documents in the archives of the Auschwitz State Museum in Poland[/I]

Any other documents from that museum you want to show? There are such things as Biased views.

 

[Nonpareil]

Any other documents from that museum you want to show? There is such this as Biased views.

In addition, it's a matter of historic fact that the Nazis kept up a campaign of disinformation to keep the common Germans from learning about the extermination campaign. That's why there are so few references to the Holocaust in Nazi documents, except in higher-ranking circles. Hence the reason why Himmler's speech to the SS is such a critical piece of evidence. It was a rule under the Nazi regime not to just go around talking about the death camps.