Waterman
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2008
- Messages
- 251
Well actually the gospel writers (and apostles) Matthew and John were eyewitnesses.
And with regard to those NT writers who were not direct eyewitnesses, you, other skeptics, and history books, have no problem believing in Alexander the Great who conquered much of the known world and upon which there are no contemporary writings in existence. Why do you and others put a different standard on Alexander who conquered much of world?
You seem to be missing a major point. There are many people here that are willing to accept that there was a historical Jeasus. Though they are unwiling to accept the super powers. If the claims were that ALexander the Great carried the elephants over the mountains or cause an avalanche to part around army through his superpower then eveyrone here would be all over that.
It is you that is applying a different standard, you are trying to equate the accepting the existance of AtG as equivalent to the existance of Jesus AND his super powers. It is NOT the same.