Evidence for why we know the New Testament writers told the truth.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have just skipped the last 200-or-so of the 7,059 posts...

Have I missed any evidence (as promised in the OP)?
 
Although why Peter deserved to get actual physical evidence to quell his doubts and we do not is beyond me.
The book cited in post 1 (page 322) responds to your point:

"Does Jesus have to appear to every person in the world to make his claims credible? Why would he? We don't have to witness every event firsthand in order to believe the event actually occurred. In fact, it would be practically impossible to do so. We believe the testimony of others if they are trustworthy individuals {for example Luke, called one of the world's greatest historians}, and especially if their testimony is corroborated by other data. This is exactly the case with the testimony of the New Testament writers.

...if God were too overt because of frequent miraculous displays, then he might, in some cases infringe on our free will. If the purpose of this life is for all of us to freely make choices that will prepare us for eternity, then God will give us convincing evidence but not compelling evidence of his existence and purposes. Therefore, those who want to follow God can do so with confidence, and those who do not can suppress or ignore the evidence and live as if he didn't exist."
 
The book cited in post 1 (page 322) responds to your point:

"Does Jesus have to appear to every person in the world to make his claims credible? Why would he? We don't have to witness every event firsthand in order to believe the event actually occurred. In fact, it would be practically impossible to do so. We believe the testimony of others if they are trustworthy individuals {for example Luke, called one of the world's greatest historians}, and especially if their testimony is corroborated by other data. This is exactly the case with the testimony of the New Testament writers.


Most world events do not violate the laws of physics. Extraordinary claims, etc.

...if God were too overt because of frequent miraculous displays, then he might, in some cases infringe on our free will. If the purpose of this life is for all of us to freely make choices that will prepare us for eternity, then God will give us convincing evidence but not compelling evidence of his existence and purposes.


Translation: Because if an imaginary creature couldn't impinge on an imaginary property, people wouldn't be able to enjoy an imaginary destination.

Therefore, those who want to follow God can do so with confidence, and those who do not can suppress or ignore the evidence and live as if he didn't exist."


Care to provide any of that evidence?
 
Edited by Tricky: 
Edited for Rule 9.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry, took ages to look up my bible (been busy) but re: the death of Judas.
Judas threw away his ill-gotten silver and hung himself.
Judas used his ill-gotten silver to buy a field where he tripped, burst open and his guts went everywhere....presumedly dying at this point.
This is why there is a "Field of Blood" because they took his silver (after he hung himself) and used it to buy a graveyard because the money was unclean...no, wait....it's called the Field of Blood because Judas' bowels spilled all over it.

For the kids playing at home, it's Matthew 27:5, Acts 1:18. Keeping reading each for the field of blood bit.

Now, I don't claim that the bible is 100% accurate and contradiction free, but many do and this is only useful to demonstrate to them that the inerring word of god has errors. If you are more moderate and say well of course the bible is not perfect, it is the work of men, or came to us through men etc but this hasn't sidestepped the issue. If you admit that the bible is NOT the inerring word of god, or that he didn't step in for some proofreading then we have the problem of knowing which bits are right and which bits are wrong. Thus the bible becomes utterly useless in it's intended function - the word of god. Yes, I'm imposing stricter conditions on it than any other book in history, but we have to put it (and any other religious writings for that matter...Koran, I'm looking at you...) into its own category because if it's the word of god, then it's either perfect or useless.
 
The book cited in post 1 (page 322) responds to your point:

"Does Jesus have to appear to every person in the world to make his claims credible? Why would he? We don't have to witness every event firsthand in order to believe the event actually occurred. In fact, it would be practically impossible to do so. We believe the testimony of others if they are trustworthy individuals {for example Luke, called one of the world's greatest historians}, and especially if their testimony is corroborated by other data. This is exactly the case with the testimony of the New Testament writers.
Oh good at long last we are going to get 3rd party corroboration with the New testament writers of the miracles in the bible. I just wish you had provided it in one of your previous 1225 posts in this thread.
...if God were too overt because of frequent miraculous displays, then he might, in some cases infringe on our free will. If the purpose of this life is for all of us to freely make choices that will prepare us for eternity, then God will give us convincing evidence but not compelling evidence of his existence and purposes. Therefore, those who want to follow God can do so with confidence, and those who do not can suppress or ignore the evidence and live as if he didn't exist."
Too overt, you are kidding. Name one mircale from God that has convincing evidence that it was him.
 
Too overt, you are kidding. Name one mircale from God that has convincing evidence that it was him.
I'm convinced by all the evidence I've presented in my 1200 posts in this thread as well as other evidence I've presented in other threads. For example my thread "The 25 fulfilled prophecies of Isaiah 53". If your truly not convinced, then so be it. But there is plenty of evidence there for Christians to believe, and nothing any skeptic has said in this or any other thread has changed my mind.
 
Last edited:
I have just skipped the last 200-or-so of the 7,059 posts...

Have I missed any evidence (as promised in the OP)?

Well, as such, in the strictest, narrowest definition of the word, possibly not.
We have had Josh McDowell's 'six proofs' relinked, though.
 
I'm convinced by all the evidence I've presented in my 1200 posts in this thread as well as other evidence I've presented in other threads. For example my thread "The 25 fulfilled prophecies of Isaiah 43". If your truly not convinced, then so be it. But there is plenty of evidence there for Christians to believe, and nothing any skeptic has said in this or any other thread has changed my mind.


The thread where Ichneumonwasp showed that the interpretation of the suffering servant can only apply to Israel?

If that is the standard to which your faith is held, no wonder you find Geisler's arguments convincing.
 
I'm convinced by all the evidence I've presented in my 1200 posts in this thread as well as other evidence I've presented in other threads. For example my thread "The 25 fulfilled prophecies of Isaiah 43".
Excuse me that was Isaiah 53, not Isaiah 43.
 
Last edited:
I'm convinced by all the evidence I've presented in my 1200 posts in this thread as well as other evidence I've presented in other threads. For example my thread "The 25 fulfilled prophecies of Isaiah 43". If your truly not convinced, then so be it. But there is plenty of evidence there for Christians to believe, and nothing any skeptic has said in this or any other thread has changed my mind.
I agree that for anyone to beleive jesus fits isaiah would need a miracle given the obvious discrepancies. I was hoping however that when you talked about God's mircales we would have something a bit more real.
 
Last edited:
I agree that for anyone to beleive jesus fits isaiah would need a miracle given the obvious discrepancies.

I don't need a miracle to believe Jesus in the New Testament fits these verses.

From Isaiah Chapter 53

Who has believed our message
and to whom has the arm of the LORD been revealed?

He grew up before him like a tender shoot,
and like a root out of dry ground.

1 He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him,
nothing in his appearance that we should desire him.

2 He was despised and rejected by men,

3 a man of sorrows, and familiar with suffering.

4 Like one from whom men hide their faces
he was despised, and we esteemed him not.

5 Surely he took up our infirmities
and carried our sorrows,

6 yet we considered him stricken by God,
smitten by him, and afflicted.

7 But he was pierced for our transgressions,

8 he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him,
and by his wounds we are healed.

9 We all, like sheep, have gone astray,
each of us has turned to his own way;
and the LORD has laid on him
the iniquity of us all.

10 He was oppressed and afflicted,
yet he did not open his mouth;

11 he was led like a lamb to the slaughter,

12 and as a sheep before her shearers is silent,
so he did not open his mouth.

13 By oppression [a] and judgment he was taken away.

14 And who can speak of his descendants?
For he was cut off from the land of the living;
for the transgression of my people he was stricken.

15 He was assigned a grave with the wicked,

16 and with the rich in his death,

17 though he had done no violence,
nor was any deceit in his mouth.

18 Yet it was the LORD's will to crush him and cause him to suffer,
and though the LORD makes his life a guilt offering,

19 he will see his offspring and prolong his days,
and the will of the LORD will prosper in his hand.

20 After the suffering of his soul,
he will see the light of life and be satisfied;

21 by his knowledge my righteous servant will justify many,
and he will bear their iniquities.

22 Therefore I will give him a portion among the great,

23 and he will divide the spoils with the strong,

24 because he poured out his life unto death,
and was numbered with the transgressors.

25 For he bore the sin of many,
and made intercession for the transgressors.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=142542
 
Last edited:
The thread where Ichneumonwasp showed that the interpretation of the suffering servant can only apply to Israel?
Yes, some have that opinion (that wasn't developed until the Middle Ages by a Jewish Rabbi) -- many others don't. Jews have converted to Christianity because of Isaiah 53.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply, sonofgloin;
Jesus was around for three years, you could touch him, they did not come to him looking for the etherial, but it seems they found it in him.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've always had the impression Jesus was sought precisely for that; the story of the centurion comes to mind as an example.


As for the reserection, if you did not witness it then you require faith, and as I said faith is the suspension of disbelief.

I agree with you there, sonofgloin.




Ofcourse, they were men of their times

From the modern examples linked here, it seems large numbers of people can still be so deeply moved by the etherial.



They certainly told their version of the truth, as do the various denominations today. We can only rely on the texts of the few non interested observers of the times who's mention of Christ and his demise fit the chronology and geography. Given that he was mentioned within a lifetime of his being by these authors we can surmise the early Christians did have a Christ. If you accept there was a christ could all the biography be fiction.

Not quite. The examples linked up have been reported within the life-times of the participants, as well.
 
All kinds of religions have resurrection stories.

<snip to the kewl heretical bits>


The much older Egyptian sun-worship had many such beliefs.

-----------------

The god Horus was the son of the gods Osiris and Isis. The three of them formed a unit, a trinity.

The Christian trinity is of Egyptian origin. The Jews had no trinity, only the Lord, who made it clear he would stand for no rivals.

Osiris died and was resurrected before he fathered Horus.

"Out of Egypt have I called my son." (Matt. 2:15)

Each pharaoh was considered to be a re-incarnation of Horus.

The story of Horus can be found in "The Egyptian Book of the Dead” (also known as the "Papyrus of Ani") written over 3,000 years before the birth of Jesus.

The adoration of the Virgin and Child is connected with the adoration of Isis and the infant Horus. Their portraits are remarkably alike.

----------------------


QFT


So just as temple priests 'faked' miracles and swore they were the actions of the gods, so the followers of Jesus swore that he had raised the dead, walked on water, fed the mob, etc.


Troublesome priests. Tell me about it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom