Letterman scandal

You're hopeless optimism aside, that's precisely what didn't happen despite anticipation from the frothing (and self-feeding) right.

The National Organization for Women is a right wing organization? OK.
 
Late Night jokes at Letterman's expense, sort of.

“There’s a new book out called ‘Why Women Have Sex,’ that has a list of 237 reasons why women have sex. And Letterman knows the Top 10"
Jimmy Fallon

"Hey, next to Roman Polanski and Mackenzie Phillips’ dad, I think Dave looks pretty good.” Bill Maher

“If you came here tonight for sex with a talk-show host, you’ve got the wrong studio. First Conan hit his head, then somebody tries to extort money from Letterman. I’m so glad I’m out of late night.” Jay Leno

It was left to Letterman's buddy, Stern, to take the sugar coating off the barbs.

"It sets up a work environment where people get the message that if you suck off the boss you can get ahead...It becomes pretty clear around the workplace that if you want to get ahead, you become one of Dave's girls." Howard Stern

"A childish need to dominate a woman." Howard Stern
 
Last edited:
....

"It sets up a work environment where people get the message that if you suck off the boss you can get ahead...It becomes pretty clear around the workplace that if you want to get ahead, you become one of Dave's girls." Howard Stern

"A childish need to dominate a woman." Howard Stern
One might suspect Stern was projecting there.
 
One might suspect Stern was projecting there.

Right. Stern has been cheating on Beth Horsetrosky ever since Robin Quivers shed 100lbs. More like Stern acknowledges that this story is about Letterman's low self-esteem than it is about blackmail.
 
Right. Stern has been cheating on Beth Horsetrosky ever since Robin Quivers shed 100lbs. More like Stern acknowledges that this story is about Letterman's low self-esteem than it is about blackmail.
I was thinking more along the lines of Stern is the chauvinist pig and he's projecting that sentiment onto Letterman.
 
Correct. He cheated on the mother of his child.

Not that I know the details of the case, but do you know for a fact that he did? Maybe they were in an open relationship, maybe it happened during a period when they were not together or, hell, maybe he'd asked and gotten permission.

This is 2009. Sexual mores aren't what they used to be (not that they ever really were in the first place.)
 
I saw a documentary on a bittorrent site called "Lettermans.Nailing.Palin":D
 
Not that I know the details of the case, but do you know for a fact that he did? Maybe they were in an open relationship, maybe it happened during a period when they were not together or, hell, maybe he'd asked and gotten permission.

If any of your scenarios were true Letterman would not have said the following:


"She has been horribly hurt by my behavior, and when something happens like that, if you hurt a person and it’s your responsibility, you try to fix it. And at that point, there’s only two things that can happen: either you’re going to make some progress and get it fixed, or you’re going to fall short and perhaps not get it fixed, so let me tell you folks, I got my work cut out for me.”
 
I was thinking more along the lines of Stern is the chauvinist pig and he's projecting that sentiment onto Letterman.

As far as their on air personalities, both Letterman and Stern make "chauvinist pig" comments. As far as taking advantage of the employer/employee relationship, Letterman leaves Stern in the dust.
 
As far as their on air personalities, both Letterman and Stern make "chauvinist pig" comments. As far as taking advantage of the employer/employee relationship, Letterman leaves Stern in the dust.
Claiming Letterman and Stern both demean women equally is absurd. Perhaps you don't know what is meant by the term, chauvinist? It doesn't mean only making remarks about a woman's attractiveness. It means treating women like nothing more than sex objects or housekeeper/child raisers or both. There's no way Stern and Letterman on air are the same.

And since I doubt you know Stern personally and I know neither of them, any discussion beyond the above is a waste of speculation.
 
Claiming Letterman and Stern both demean women equally is absurd. Perhaps you don't know what is meant by the term, chauvinist? It doesn't mean only making remarks about a woman's attractiveness. It means treating women like nothing more than sex objects or housekeeper/child raisers or both. There's no way Stern and Letterman on air are the same.

And since I doubt you know Stern personally and I know neither of them, any discussion beyond the above is a waste of speculation.

Since you do not know either of these two folks personally, how did you conclude the "claim" was "absurd?"
 
You just said you were talking about their on-air personalities. Which is it?

I was talking about their on-air personalities, while skeptigirl seems to imply how they behave in their private lives, as I never said "Letterman and Stern both demean women equally" on the air.
 
Last edited:
Since you do not know either of these two folks personally, how did you conclude the "claim" was "absurd?"
You are trying to argue semantics. Another waste of time. That was a reference to their on air personas.

Edited to add: and apparently it was obvious.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom