• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Freeman Movement and England

Status
Not open for further replies.
LisssaLysikan,

SHOW US RIGHT HERE THE LAW WHICH ALLOWS THE USA TO IMPOSE A FEDERAL INCOME TAX !

We are still waiting. This is my fourth request.

Would you like a few hours to find it ?

I am happy to wait. In fact, I won't post on any other subject until you reply.

Dude. Seriously?
 
Hey it's gone feral. Super Upper Case and Bold!


Yes, and let's have an answer. We want to see the actual legislation, the law, that imposes a Federal Income Tax in the USA. With its references, its date, and the actual text.

And we are still waiting.
 
LisssaLysikan,

SHOW US RIGHT HERE THE LAW WHICH ALLOWS THE USA TO IMPOSE A FEDERAL INCOME TAX !

We are still waiting. This is my fourth request.

Would you like a few hours to find it ?

I am happy to wait. In fact, I won't post on any other subject until you reply.

I did. Try reading. And grow up - posting in giant letters is what children do.
 
Dude. Seriously?

Yes, seriously.

I can stay online all day if necessary. Just want to see the law, the actual reference, the date and the text of the legislation to impose a federal income tax in the USA.

A fair and reasonable request, yes ?

35 minutes and counting.
 
Why are we talking about America? Can we get back to The Common Law of England, and move the US stuff to a different thread?
 
The Constitution itself, dumbass. Look at articles 8 and 16, to be specific.

ETA: Not you being a dumbass, Volatile. The jerk that refuses to read the very document he claims to know perfectly.
 
I did. Try reading. And grow up - posting in giant letters is what children do.


What date ?

What is the reference ?

Where is the text ?

Where is the law ?

We want to see the law that imposes on the USA a federal income tax.

Request Number 5 and counting
 
Last edited:
I am trying to demonstrate just how conned, how duped, we all are by governments, by mass media, by lies and downright fraud in matters of tax. The Federal Income Tax of the USA is a good example. And I am asking to see the actual law, the actual information to support a federal income tax in the USA. Not much to ask, is it ? The date, the reference, and the actual text.

I suggest you look at your OP. You claimed you were talking about the FoTL movement in England. Or maybe the UK. It's clear you don't really understand the difference. You also implied that you were from the UK.

Of course, we now know this was a fiction. You're wanting to talk about the usual US crap. In short, you're yet another conspiracy theorist fraud.

You can't even hold to your promise not to discuss anything else until a "law" which supports US income tax is cited. But then, you also don't see the logical falicy in requesting a law to support your argument when you claim that all laws are bunkum.

Comedy gold.
 
Yes, seriously.

I can stay online all day if necessary. Just want to see the law, the actual reference, the date and the text of the legislation to impose a federal income tax in the USA.

A fair and reasonable request, yes ?

35 minutes and counting.

You've had the links! Article 1 of the Constitution, and the 16th Amendment thereto. Why is that so hard?

By the way:

What is the point of even going through the theatre of the FMOTL stuff if it can only, logically, be ineffective?

What is the point of all this FMOTL stuff if the powers that be can (and will) just ignore it? It does seem that the people on the forum (and you, too) believe that the words somehow magically compel adherence from otherwise evil judges. That's craziness. It's also crazy to think the the NWO are so evil that they will discard The Law of England, but not evil enough to simply ignore a bureaucratic inconvenience that might impede their evilness. Don't you agree?

So what are you advocating? Armed rebellion? Is that it? Anarchy? What do you suggest is the best course of action should a judge gaol a Freeman? If and when it is transgressed, how is the Common Law of England enforced, and by whom?
 
You've had the links! Article 1 of the Constitution, and the 16th Amendment thereto. Why is that so hard?

By the way:

What is the point of even going through the theatre of the FMOTL stuff if it can only, logically, be ineffective?

What is the point of all this FMOTL stuff if the powers that be can (and will) just ignore it? It does seem that the people on the forum (and you, too) believe that the words somehow magically compel adherence from otherwise evil judges. That's craziness. It's also crazy to think the the NWO are so evil that they will discard The Law of England, but not evil enough to simply ignore a bureaucratic inconvenience that might impede their evilness. Don't you agree?

So what are you advocating? Armed rebellion? Is that it? Anarchy? What do you suggest is the best course of action should a judge gaol a Freeman? If and when it is transgressed, how is the Common Law of England enforced, and by whom?

I have repeatedly told you that the laws of England must be upheld.

Why do you smear this thread ?

You know perfectly well that the laws of England are NOT those of the Admiralty Law.

So stop messing about.

Thank You
 
Yes, seriously.

I can stay online all day if necessary. Just want to see the law, the actual reference, the date and the text of the legislation to impose a federal income tax in the USA.

A fair and reasonable request, yes ?

35 minutes and counting.
Yes Especially,

I can pop in and out all day if necessary. Just want to see a single case , or the court reference, where a breach of statute law has been won by a defendant citing that statute law doesn't apply as they never consented.

Eleven times I have made this fair and reasonable request, yes ?

1465 minutes and counting
 
So what are you advocating? Armed rebellion? Is that it? Anarchy? What do you suggest is the best course of action should a judge gaol a Freeman? If and when it is transgressed, how is the Common Law of England enforced, and by whom?


Well, Especially? What do you propose?
 
I have repeatedly told you that the laws of England must be upheld.

Why do you smear this thread ?

You know perfectly well that the laws of England are NOT those of the Admiralty Law.

You have repeatedly told me that. Fine. OK. I accept that "the laws of England are NOT those of the Admiralty Law". So what do we do now? You've also told me that the judges and the police and everyone else is run by the NWO, so WHY would they uphold "the laws of England", if such laws would prevent them carrying out their evil plan?

What will you do if a judge - an evil, Jesuit judge working for the NWO - refuses to "uphold the laws of England". Who enforces the "Laws of England", and how? Please explain this rather glaring inconsistency in your position.
 
Last edited:
You've been answered. That you choose not to recognize the Constitution of the US as legally binding is your deficiency, not ours.
Now go back to proving you are as ignorant of the UK as you are of the US.
 
You've been answered. That you choose not to recognize the Constitution of the US as legally binding is your deficiency, not ours.
Now go back to proving you are as ignorant of the UK as you are of the US.


Request Number 7

Please show us the actual law, the reference, the date, and the details of the legislation to impose a Federal Income Tax on the USA.

We don't want any more delay. No more bogus references. Please provide the exact and actual documentary evidence.

Thank You
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom