• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

How is this for Complete Idiocy?

fishbob

Seasonally Disaffected
Joined
Jan 17, 2003
Messages
7,316
Location
Chilly Undieville
The American Daily Review warned in April that the Census Bureau is “shooting GPS coordinates of your doorway” in possible preparation for a secret Obama plan to cede some of America’s sovereignty to the United Nations.

“If the government decided to rely on foreign troops, perhaps United Nations personnel, most of which may not understand the street signs, much less know the lay of the land, they could use GPS devices to direct them to your front door,” the site explained.

source

I blame the Hannity / Beck / Coulter / O'Reilly type ideology attacks on reality.
 
The thing I don’t understand about these “The UN is going to invade the US on behest of the US federal government” is even if there is an evil cabal in the US Federal Government why does the US Federal Government need the UN?

Obama is already the head of the USA. Why would Obama want to cede control of the organization that he was the head of to an organization that he is not the head of? As commander in chief of the USA military why would Obama need the UN to get something done militarily? What is it that the UN has that the US military does not have?

Even as a crazy consipiracy theory it just does nto make sense to me.
 
Look- if you're so slow that you can't understand a perfectly straightforward Conspiracy Theory which is absolutely transparent to every moron in America, there really ain't much hope for you in the NWO.
Best stay here with the rest of us slowpokes.
 
The thing I don’t understand about these “The UN is going to invade the US on behest of the US federal government” is even if there is an evil cabal in the US Federal Government why does the US Federal Government need the UN?

Obama is already the head of the USA. Why would Obama want to cede control of the organization that he was the head of to an organization that he is not the head of? As commander in chief of the USA military why would Obama need the UN to get something done militarily? What is it that the UN has that the US military does not have?

Even as a crazy consipiracy theory it just does nto make sense to me.

I believe the idea is that Obama is a pawn of the secret masters of the UN who want to make sure that the USA permanently surrenders its sovereignty to the secret masters. Otherwise, they run the risk that a future president, one who is not so (ahem) "compliant" would raise a ruckus. And since the conspiracy theorists are trying to raise exactly such a ruckus, it makes sense from their perspective that Obama would want to act in such a way as to nip any possible counteractivism in the bud.

It's not really that crazy -- that situation is approximately what the US has been trying to foment in a number of countries, including Iraq, for some time. While the US has no desire for direct sovereignty over Iraq, it would certainly be nice (from some points of view) if it could get a compliant set of Iraqi statesmen to rewrite the country's political and social rules to make sure that "they" will be long-term compliant and subservient to "us." We did the same thing to Japan in the aftermath of WWII, rewriting their constitution to "Americanize" and "pacify" Japan, even after we officially lifted the military occupation. It worked, too. In less than forty years, Japan went from actively-hostile state to one of our largest trading partners, political ally, and host for US forces on forward deployment.

Why would Shigeru Yoshida (the first post-war prime minister of Japan) want to "cede control of the organization that he was the head of to an organization that he is not the head of?" That's actually not a bad description from an outsider's point of view of the Yoshida doctrine. When you understand why Yoshida wanted to suck up to Truman, you might understand why a hypothetical president of the USA would want to suck up to the UN.
 
I believe the idea is that Obama is a pawn of the secret masters of the UN who want to make sure that the USA permanently surrenders its sovereignty to the secret masters. Otherwise, they run the risk that a future president, one who is not so (ahem) "compliant" would raise a ruckus. And since the conspiracy theorists are trying to raise exactly such a ruckus, it makes sense from their perspective that Obama would want to act in such a way as to nip any possible counteractivism in the bud.

It's not really that crazy -- that situation is approximately what the US has been trying to foment in a number of countries, including Iraq, for some time. While the US has no desire for direct sovereignty over Iraq, it would certainly be nice (from some points of view) if it could get a compliant set of Iraqi statesmen to rewrite the country's political and social rules to make sure that "they" will be long-term compliant and subservient to "us." We did the same thing to Japan in the aftermath of WWII, rewriting their constitution to "Americanize" and "pacify" Japan, even after we officially lifted the military occupation. It worked, too. In less than forty years, Japan went from actively-hostile state to one of our largest trading partners, political ally, and host for US forces on forward deployment.

Why would Shigeru Yoshida (the first post-war prime minister of Japan) want to "cede control of the organization that he was the head of to an organization that he is not the head of?" That's actually not a bad description from an outsider's point of view of the Yoshida doctrine. When you understand why Yoshida wanted to suck up to Truman, you might understand why a hypothetical president of the USA would want to suck up to the UN.

You know drkitten, you've convinced me! I'f you'll exscuse me I'm going to stock up on .223 rounds and design my bunker for when the UN tanks roll through. They'll never take me alive. . .

err wait thats not what I mean.
 
I remember seeing people complaining on TV about codes on the sides of electricity and telephone poles back in the 1990s. Bush I or Clinton I were going to get the Gurkhas to invade on behalf of the British or the UN (or both, I forget) and the Gurkhas needed those codes to find their way around.


Thankfully the concerned citizens of America exposed that plot and so they never invaded.
 
That reminds me of a quote, which I can't find so this is from memory, from the movie Separate but Equal, when a white lawyer is explaining to the other black lawyers why he's working with the ACLU.

"When I was a kid my daddy took me aside and said, 'Son, is the headquarters of the ACLU is a locked room. Inside that room are walls covered with keys. Each one of those keys goes to the bedroom of a white southern woman.' When I heard that, I thought to myself, 'Now that's an organization I have to join.'"
 
The idea of linking information such as census data to geographical information is called GIS
or Geographical information sytem.
Here is a link for what the whole deal is about.
http://www.gis.com/
 
Last edited:
That can't be right.

I looked at the site, clicked the "implementation" tab, then "consider the strategic purpose" block, and found absolutely nothing about the NWO.
 

Back
Top Bottom