Jorghnassen
Illuminator
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2004
- Messages
- 3,942
Geimer was 13 years old when Polanski allegedly plied the aspiring model with Champagne and Quaaludes and told her he was photographing her for French Vogue.
and I doubt there was any great harm done here.
BTW, any reason why Switzerland was the country that decided to arrested him, and not the other European countries he lived in and visited since his warrant?
Any lawyer will tell you there are no guarantees in a plea bargain.I fully agree 100% with you. BUT on the other hand if really the judge & prosecutor MADE an agreement only to recant it afterward, they should be taken to task (if still alive) and the original agreement upheld.
IIRC it was no secret that he also had sex with Natassja Kinski (sp?) when she was 13. Seems he has a thing for pubescent girls.Question: is this the only time he's been accused of paedophilia?
Absolutely ridiculous arresting Polanski for this after 32 years.
Good grief.
Laws in the U.S. on this are totally ludicrous anyway, and not based upon research. The woman involved has said she doesn't want him to serve time, and I doubt there was any great harm done here.
With all of the criminals running rampant, some prosecutor arrests a guy for what sounded like consensual sex, 32 years ago? Some kind of statute of limitations has to apply somehow to this. If not it should. Please, this prosecutor must be some kind of moron.
I have a very strong feeling that Polanski will be free before long, and he should be. Watch and see. Not all justice systems are as stupid as the U.S.
Geeezzzzz.
Thirteen is just a child.
wikipedia said:Geimer testified that Polanski performed various sexual acts on her[28][29][30] after giving her a combination of champagne and quaaludes.[31]
Slightly off topic, but in Mexico time spent on the lam is considered as still serving your sentence. So even if you escape from prison and manage to stay in hiding until your sentence runs out you're free at that point. Likewise if you flee from prosecution.Not at all rediculous. He raped a child and jumped bail to avoid going to jail for his crime. Not to get all Les Miz, but the law was clear as was his guilt and he just decided that he shouldn't have to pay for his stupidity. By this logic, no Nazi war criminal should have been prosecuted if, say, they could stay free for 30 years. It makes no sense.
http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/?last_story=/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/09/28/polanski_arrest/
You might have to be registered to get to this, but it pretty well puts it in perspective.
Thirteen is just a child.
I read in the New York Times today it was because they had quite a bit of advanced knowledge he would be there which gave them enough time to get the paperwork together and plan the arrest.
Where's DanishDynamite to defend Roman?
Ok seriously tho...
I say it's past due for him (Polanski) to be returned to finish facing this legal proceeding.