Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
CompusMentus said:
I think I see what you mean, the non-plot hasn't thickened at all, it's about as thin as dishwater.

BTW don't worry about me, I've been lurking on JREF long enough. I've seen it all.


Compus
Click to expand...

Oh dear Compus, you're not going to let me down are you ? I thought I would get an honest evaluation from you at least but now I am starting to wonder ...?
 
bill smith said:
I am sure he original VHS video is available although it appears that it is being purged from the net. Fortunately the video exists in perhaps mllions of households around the world.
Click to expand...


Please clarify.

I looked at the relevant video on that archive. You're right I couldn't find it in the Fox section. Why then, do you extrapolate that omission into a "purging" of the video on the internet? Pointing out that it doesn't exist in one archive is not definitive proof of a purge is it?

Have you contacted Fox to find out if the original chopper shot is available?

You also ask me to "evaluate" (speculate) why Fox are "hiding" the original record yet provide no proper evidence, only your opinion, that they are doing so. If it isn't there (ETA On the Fox site, I don't know. I haven't looked) there may be many reasons why this particular video isn't available on their site. Again, have you contacted them to ask?


Compus
 
Last edited:
CompusMentus said:
Please clarify.

I looked at the relevant video on that archive. You're right I couldn't find it in the Fox section. Why then, do you extrapolate that omission into a "purging" of the video on the internet? Pointing out that it doesn't exist in one archive is not definitive proof of a purge is it?

Have you contacted Fox to find out if the original chopper shot is available?

You also ask me to "evaluate" (speculate) why Fox are "hiding" the original record yet provide no proper evidence, only your opinion, that they are doing so. If it isn't there (I don't know. I haven't looked) there may be many reasons why this particular video isn't available on their site. Again, have contacted them to ask?


Compus
Click to expand...

Thank you Compus. I think I already know enough. I do like to know what I am dealing with.
 
Bill;
Really, stop beating around the bush and make a point for once. What do you think this means? Use your brain and try to make your case (although I can't even imagine what it would be).
 
bill smith said:
Thank you Compus. I think I already know enough. I do like to know what I am dealing with.
Click to expand...


Is that it? That's your specific and honest debate over?

Well you had me bang to rights there. How will I ever recover from such a savage merciless beating?


Compus
 
DGM said:
Bill;
Really, stop beating around the bush and make a point for once. What do you think this means? Use your brain and try to make your case (although I can't even imagine what it would be).
Click to expand...

Anybody who followed that from the outside (those who it was really meant for) will have no problem ascertaining what the significance is. That is my only concern.

Ypu jref people may have to put your thinking caps on. Nobody said you had to be a rocket scientist to be a jref debunker..
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Anybody who followed that from the outside (those who it was really meant for) will have no problem ascertaining what the significance is. That is my only concern.

Ypu jref people may have to put your thinking caps on. Nobody said you had to be a rocket scientist to be a jref debunker....luckily.
Click to expand...
Why do you want me to speculate what you mean? Say it, make your point. Why do you avoid supporting your believes? Not so sure of yourself (speculating)?
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Anybody who followed that from the outside (those who it was really meant for) will have no problem ascertaining what the significance is. That is my only concern.
Ypu jref people may have to put your thinking caps on. Nobody said you had to be a rocket scientist to be a jref debunker....luckily.
Click to expand...


That just about sums up your input here.

And it was you who predicted that I would "obfuscate"

Back under the bridge Bill, you missed out on a few trolling opportunities for the last hour or so.

I asked you for a good honest, specific argument about 9/11 and you come up with some broad baseless speculation that Fox are commiting a crime because you can't locate a video clip.

Go figure.


Compus
 
Last edited:
CompusMentus said:
That just about sums up your input here.

And it was you who predicted that I would "obfuscate"

Back under the bridge Bill, you missed out on a few trolling opportunities for the last hour or so.

I asked you for a good honest, specific argument about 9/11 and you come up with some broad baseless speculation that Fox are commiting a crime because you can't locate a video clip.

Go figure.


Compus
Click to expand...

I figured you Compus.
 
CompusMentus said:
That just about sums up your input here.

And it was you who predicted that I would "obfuscate"

Back under the bridge Bill, you missed out on a few trolling opportunities for the last hour or so.

I asked you for a good honest, specific argument about 9/11 and you come up with some broad baseless speculation that Fox are commiting a crime because you can't locate a video clip.

Go figure.


Compus
Click to expand...

Got to say Compus, you called it

CompusMentus said:
That's it with you, you never argue specifics. You deal in generalisations, speculation and bad "facts". For instance your failure to condemn the "vicsims" drivel. It just adds to your troll CV.

Show me a post you've made, where you stated some thing specific about 9/11 events. We'll use the General Discussion thread as you request. Don't want to derail this thread any further.

Please, try and find something that hasn't been thoroughly debunked here already. That is, I really don't want to waste my time on nonsense like "pull it" "freefall" "thermite, thermate, super nanothermite" "DEW" etc etc.

Please bring something new to the table, something we can all have a good honest debate about.




Compus
Click to expand...

Not that anyone is surprised. BS has never brought anything to the debate. Just... BS.
 
bill smith said:
The point s that all the TV companies have put their live broadcast footage on their websites. You will agree that this is part of the immutable physical record of events on 9/11 ? Any significant alteration of that record is a moral outrage if not a flat out crime. . The archive site I link to shows hours of contiguous footage from all the major channels both before the events began and after. All appear to be as broadcat on the day. All except FOX who is the only company to have caught the plane going through the building.
However they have replaced that sequence on their site with other footage shot from the opposite side of the Towers. This is no longer the authentic broadcast and is a clear attempt tp hide the penetraton shot. So I wanted your evaluation of why they did it ?
Click to expand...



Bill, I took the time to have a look at the MyFox New York website. It took me about 30 seconds to google it.

Being the charitable guy I am, I'll help you out. On THIS PAGE I found something you may be interested in.

Wind it forward to near the end Bill (to about 14:50) oh my.


344914ac00403c0704.jpg



It's the Chopper 5 video Bill, right there for all the world to see. Do you see it Bill? Fox haven't "replaced" anything.

Who is "purging" what? Who is hiding the "penetration"? Not Fox.

Do you understand now why I didn't want to "evaluate" what you stated? You are wrong Bill.


Compus
 
Heh. Is bill smith trying to play a movie prosecutor, attempting to trick the defendant into saying something incriminating? He doesn't seem to be very good at it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom