Merged Migraine Test, VFF, and LightinDarkness

Drs_Res said:
Please (for the third time now) stop calling it a remote viewing test, it's not.
Click to expand...

Yep the tests suggested are not remote viewing, but ironically, from the conversation with UncaYimmy;

[9/14/2009 9:31:48 PM] Anita Ikonen: Is your wife right there?
[9/14/2009 9:31:56 PM] Anita Ikonen: Yes or no.
[9/14/2009 9:32:17 PM] Jim Carr: My wife is asleep and rarely comes in my office when she's awake.
Click to expand...

Anita said:
I absolutely did ask about your wife because I had an image of her and wanted to know whether it was because she was there.
Click to expand...

That is possibly the text-book defintion of remote viewing. :D
 
Last edited:
StevenCalder said:
Yep the tests suggested are not remote viewing, but ironically, from the conversation with UncaYimmy;





That is possibly the text book defintion of remote viewing. :D
Click to expand...

Vision From Feeling, Inc

Migraines in your head? Haunting in your home? Vff can help!

Wondering what Ben Franklin forgot to write down? Need to find your foot in a shoe? Don't know what that pill is? Vff is here for you!

Go days with out food and water? Weekly!

Remember that time you woke up in a bathtub full of ice? Did they really take your kidney? Vff can tell you!

You've got cancer, oh dear! Should you eat carrots or bugs? VFF knows!

Lost diaphragm? No problems!

Share your ice cream with a psychic? She can do it remotely!

Or maybe you've always wanted your picture taken with a genuine alien. Gotcha covered!

Remember, she's also a super-serious scientist. Be sure to ask about past lives, modern eugenics, the vibrations of bacteria and the higher frequency of white light!

Vision from Feeling, Inc. There's no woo that she can't do!*



*Entertainment purposes only. Results guaranteed not to fail any test that is avoided. Check your state laws for possible violations. Disbelief in VFF can cause variations in results, hissy fits and stalking. Vff, Inc is not responsible for any actual display of psychic powers, negative energy or lost articles (of test procedures). Proceed at your own risk.
 
bookitty said:
Vision From Feeling, Inc

Migraines in your head? Haunting in your home? Vff can help!

Wondering what Ben Franklin forgot to write down? Need to find your foot in a shoe? Don't know what that pill is? Vff is here for you!

Go days with out food and water? Weekly!

Remember that time you woke up in a bathtub full of ice? Did they really take your kidney? Vff can tell you!

You've got cancer, oh dear! Should you eat carrots or bugs? VFF knows!

Lost diaphragm? No problems!

Share your ice cream with a psychic? She can do it remotely!

Or maybe you've always wanted your picture taken with a genuine alien. Gotcha covered!

Remember, she's also a super-serious scientist. Be sure to ask about past lives, modern eugenics, the vibrations of bacteria and the higher frequency of white light!

Vision from Feeling, Inc. There's no woo that she can't do!*



*Entertainment purposes only. Results guaranteed not to fail any test that is avoided. Check your state laws for possible violations. Disbelief in VFF can cause variations in results, hissy fits and stalking. Vff, Inc is not responsible for any actual display of psychic powers, negative energy or lost articles (of test procedures). Proceed at your own risk.
Click to expand...

Humbly passing award to Bookitty...

That is hilarious!
 
bookitty said:
Given VFF's stalling, lying, posting other's personal information on her site, and her general inability to play well with others, "...because I am inhumane.." is the single best typo ever!
Click to expand...

It wasn't a typo. It was a Swedish play on words. :D
 
jhunter1163 said:
Where on Earth do you lose a diaphragm? :boxedin:
Click to expand...

Dunno. But if Anita were a man, it would certainly be one hell of a new twist on an old way of breaking the ice: "Hey, baby. Is that a diaphragm in your uterus or are you just happy to see me?"

:p
 
Last edited:
Posted without further ciomment. None is necessary

fromdownunder said:
I specifically mention this, as the people you wish to do this test with you are waiting on you specifically - protocol, time, date. Simple really. Why divert attention from your number one *rising with a bullet* talent?
Click to expand...

Posted by Anita on 14 September

Anita said:
And I have given all of that to the IIG.
Click to expand...

Discussion with Jim on 14 September:

[9/14/2009 9:33:54 PM] Anita Ikonen: I sincerely hope that I can agree to it and thus the test can FINALLY HAPPEN! I will do my best to accept the protocol.
Click to expand...
End of discussion.

Norm
 
Last edited:
VisionFromFeeling said:
Originally Posted by pakeha
I went around to VfF's website and lo, the name has been removed, but the woman has chosen to dedicate paragraphs explaining the incident, with a link to this thread, which rather effectively identifies the s/n of the poster who prefered to remain anon. in this affair.
I call that sort of evasion basically dishonest.

Rather like the att. attempt ploy.
I'm still unsure what VfF means by remote viewing and how it is different from people-watching in a park or mall.
Click to expand...
I will not censor my paranormal investigation when it fits the Skeptics.

I was asked to do a remote viewing test where I have to tell whether a person is or is not standing behind an opaque screen. And it is different from what I do, since I require to see the person.
Click to expand...

Sorry if I've been unclear.
Since when is honouring a potential volunteer's privacy, at his/her strenuous insistence, censorship?
Does VFF really imagine posting this sort of conflict on her website could inspire anything but the suspicion the author(ess) has serious emotional issues to resolve before claiming abilities to 'see' and att. treat?

Thanks for defining 'remote viewing', as you understand it.
Obviously the absence of a person is harder to detect than the absence of a kidney.
However, fair enough; it isn't VFF's claim.
I'm seriously puzzled why VFF hasn't investigated the kidney perception claim thoroughly on her own before bringing what may well be a one-off to people's attention.
 
Last edited:
[9/14/2009 9:36:16 PM] Anita Ikonen: Yay! They are suggesting the original test protocol with three trials with one in ten persons who is missing a kidney rather than the ten people and not being told how many are missing a kidney! That makes it much better!
Click to expand...

VFF is happy because the blinding and odds have been been reduced to a 1 in 10 shot? Repeated three times?

How does this make it better?
The claim would appear to based on a casual viewing of a person VFF asserts not to have known was missing a kidney. So. Why does knowing how many out of a given number of volunteers have only one kidney make the test better?
 
pakeha said:
I'm seriously puzzled why VFF hasn't investigated the kidney perception claim thoroughly on her own before bringing what may well be a one-off to people's attention.
Click to expand...

That's how VfF generally works.

She 'perceived' a contraceptive diaphragm once. Did she test further to see if she could do that consistently before making the claim that it is part of her ability? Nope. She just jumped to "I can detect diaphragms!"

She 'perceived' insulin shock in a patient (she says) once. Did she test further to see if she could do that consistently before making the claim that it is part of her "ability"? Nope. She just jumped to "I can save lives! I can detect insulin shock!"

She 'perceived' that the tissues around a heart were saturated with peanut oil once (she says). Did she test further to see if she could do that consistently before making the claim that it is part of her 'ability'? Nope. She just jumped to "I can save lives! I can detect heart issues!"

And the list goes on and on. Nearly everything she claims is part of her 'ability' is something she has 'perceived' once.
 
Last edited:
Hmmmm. I recently underwent a heart procedure and have surgical clips in my chest, but I don't know exactly where. Maybe VfF could view them and say where they are, then we could look at my medical records to see if she's right.

Nah, that'll never happen because it could actually falsify her claims.
 
jhunter1163 said:
Hmmmm. I recently underwent a heart procedure and have surgical clips in my chest, but I don't know exactly where. Maybe VfF could view them and say where they are, then we could look at my medical records to see if she's right.

Nah, that'll never happen because it could actually falsify her claims.
Click to expand...

Just with that information, I could make a reasonable guess with at least a decent chance of success.
 
Maybe VfF could identify x out of y people who have voluntarily swallowed a marble? I wouldn't mind swallowing a marble and later having to crap it out in the name of science (unless Anita feels it has to have a certain size to be detectable), but I have already had one stalker and it sucked.

I fail to understand how it is possible to perceive a missing kidney through bones, muscles and clothing, but to not know whether a whole, live person is standing behind a screen or not.

The migraine stuff is pure crap though. Anyone with migraines knows that they come and go, that they are different from person to person and that they sometimes disappear with age.

Could Anita detect pace makers? (Without looking for scars etc)
 
jhunter1163 said:
Hmmmm. I recently underwent a heart procedure and have surgical clips in my chest, but I don't know exactly where. Maybe VfF could view them and say where they are, then we could look at my medical records to see if she's right.

Nah, that'll never happen because it could actually falsify her claims.
Click to expand...
Sure, let's do it. Where are you located?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom