September Stundie Nominations

[Dave Rogers]

I'm nominating Ragnarok for the most irrelevant ad hominem argument I've seen in a while.

Dave, are you a Bolton fan? If so, I may as well end our discussion here, as I know you'll argue 'til you are blue in the face and are as stubborn as a mule.

So now we know why the first responders aren't talking. It's not because they were paid off. It's because they're all Bolton Wanderers fans.

Dave

 

[JoeyDonuts]

Personally, I celebrate the guy's entire catalogue.

 

[fullflavormenthol]

I have to nominate this statement from a birther on the article found here.

Relevent portion is bolded.

Definition
By prsmith on Wed, 09/16/2009 - 10:06

Based on their letters, articles, discussions, etc., we know that the founding fathers were very concerned about a usurper, a person with loyalties to powers other than the United States of America, becoming our POTUS. That is the reason they put the three word phrase "natural born citizen" in Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution. We also know that they used the Law of Nations as a primary reference during their deliberations because they specifically mention it (Article 1, Section 8, Paragraph 10). That body of work which was compiled by Vattel defines "natural born citizen" as a person who was born in the country of parents who are citizens of the country. Two requirements - born on native soil AND both parents being citizens of the nation state.

Many point to the U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark decision but that only addressed the statutory definition of citizen and not the definition of 'natural born citizen'.

So what leads you to believe that it can be interpreted in any other way?

Here is what Article 1, Section 8, Paragraph 10 actually says...

To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;

Do you think some simply searched "law of nations" without paying attention to context?

 

[Red3]

I just found this over at the Studie Factory:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1273938#post1273938

Microsoft code and the Bavarian Illuminati

In the Object Linking and Embedding 2.0 Programmer's Reference there is a very curious term. On page 78, the second paragraph starts with the sentence -- "In the aggregation model, this internal communication is achieved through coordination with a special instance of IUnknown interface known as the controlling unknown of the aggregate."

The term 'Controlling Unknown' is a very interesting choice of words. It is not the most intuitively obvious term for what it is describing (a base class used for implementing an object-oriented data exchange/embedding system).

A term strikingly similar to controlling unknown was the term "unknown superiors", used by many occult secret societies. These included the Strict Observance Masonic Lodge, whose members were sometimes referred to as Illuminati, and which had some connection with Adam Weishaupt's order. Unknown superiors is a term that refers to non-corporeal, or superhuman agencies in command of secret societies or mystery cults. Such an agency is frequently known as the inner head of an order of organisation, as opposed to the outer head, who is human.

So in a nutshell, a word describing one thing can be the same as a word describing another thing. I'm shocked!

I haven't read the whole post but I'm sure it's pretty entertaining.

The twenty-third building (or building *7*) is pentagonal in shape. Its exact location is known only to five people (of whom Bill Gates is one). It is believed that this building is accessible from "other locations" within the Microsoft campus via secret passageways.
What is in the five-sided building is not known for certain. However, it is believed that the contents of building 7 are of a "supernatural" nature.

Apart from the Pentagon, there was a similar five-sided building in Nazi Germany. The information has been concealed from the public. One hypothesis which I happen to believe is that building 7 is inhabited by, or used to communicate with, the "Inner Head", or "controlling unknown". Let me demystify that term for you. Controlling Unknown = Reptilians. The identity of the Outer Head is unknown. Bill Gates may be the Outer Head, or if not, a high initiate of the conspiracy, or perhaps just a figurehead, whose purpose is to divert attention from his leader.

I love that forum!

 

[triforcharity]

The NWO is behind bowling and Twitter?

*Throws pretzels at Alareth

Dang You!! I was SO coming here to stundie that!! Thanks alot.....

 

[NWO Sentryman]

Apparently, no-one died on 9/11:

http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=7174

ALL THE VICTIMS [of 9/11] ARE FAKE AND GENERATED BY A DECADE-OLD COMPUTER PROGRAM

WE MUST BEGIN INVESTIGATION INTO THE COMPANIES FORMERLY IN THE WTC.
THEY EACH PUT MONEY INTO SIMULATING VICSIMS FOR BANKING ROBBERIES AND PROFITS and BUSINESS HOAXES which is probably how the government bribed collaborators into working for their globalist goals.

As mentioned on our website and eloquently stated by Simon Shack a few days ago:
QUOTE

The 9/11 perpetrators are of course close chums with the bankers who hired space in the WTC towers - a 'genocide' of their own employees never was an envisaged proposition.

Hat-tip to mel-odious.

 

[triforcharity]

Please don't nominate that crap. It is a desecration of the people's memories that died that day.
Thanks.

<~~ Steps off soapbox.

But, I understand where you are coming from.

 

[Travis]

The twenty-third building (or building *7*) is pentagonal in shape. Its exact location is known only to five people (of whom Bill Gates is one).

I love this because it brings forth the image of Bill Gates and four other guys building a pentagonal building on their own or, alternatively, having a work crew construct it then gunning them down mercilessly the day it's completed. Think Christopher Walken murdering his minions after they are done with their job in the Bond film A View To A Kill with an uzi laughing all the while.

 

[Red3]

Apparently, no-one died on 9/11:

http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=7174



Hat-tip to mel-odious.

I'd really like to believe that was a wind up. Surely no one can believe that?

ALL THE VICTIMS ARE FAKE AND GENERATED BY A DECADE-OLD COMPUTER PROGRAM

Speechless

I love this because it brings forth the image of Bill Gates and four other guys building a pentagonal building on their own or, alternatively, having a work crew construct it then gunning them down mercilessly the day it's completed. Think Christopher Walken murdering his minions after they are done with their job in the Bond film A View To A Kill with an uzi laughing all the while.

I'd have loved to have overheard the phone call to the architect/builders; "...what I'm after is a pentagonal shaped, crypt with some secret passage ways...where I can keep, oh say, a multi-dimensional lizard..."

 

[Dave Rogers]

Here's Ragnarok's explanation of why the Twin Towers couldn't have crushed down.

But that is the whole point. "Stuff" was never supposed to have had time to "pile up", because the weight above was crushing everything below it!

So the existence of a pile of stuff crushing the structure proves that there wasn't a pile of stuff crushing the structure.

Dave

 

[Dave Rogers]

This is quite something from bill smith. I honestly don't think I've seen this particular stupid comment before in any form, which is quite unusual round here.

I do notice that we seem to have a very high proportion of posters with a very high number of posts who have suddenly shown up here. Probably just a concidence.

When a thread has a lot of posts in it from people who post a lot, somehow that looks suspicious. I think I speak for all of us when I say, "Huh?"

Dave

 

[Grizzly Bear]

bill18286 enlightens me on his careful reading of the NIST report and his understanding of structures:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3iKLz4oatY

lol yeeeees and the reason that NIST gives FOR the connection failures WAS that the columns were expanding and the floors were not! If everything had expanded together (as is scientifically what would have happened had the fires been as fierce as they had claimed), the whole building would simply have wobbled a little, with the steel structure remaining standing. And don't patronise me by saying "your statement was correct". All of my statements are researched, or I wouldn't make them.

For context, I noted he was correct in that concrete and steel have similar thermal properties and hence they can be used together to make reinforced concrete, but that it has nothing to do with the effect it has on the adjoining elements which hold the building together.

 

[jaydeehess]

bill smith Here
will not condemn the research into 911 including the contentions that no one died on 911!

I really hated to nom bill given that he is just too easy but this really struck a note with me. One wonders who is crazier, the guy who comes up with the contention or the guy who says, "well maybe,,,"

 

[joe911]

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=82366

I'm pretty sure that most of you are aware that by now, the market is flushed with ultra cheap, ultra portable netbook computers. Most come with a web cam to spy on you, plus there is a high possibility the books may emit a GPS tracking signal. Also, beware the Netbook's mind-controlling and/or conditioning implication through bad vibrational frequencies. For instance, take the standard Netbook screen resolution: 1024 x 600. This is an oddity since, the standard screen resolution at 1024 should be 1024 x 768.

Some maths on these numbers:

1024 x 600 = 614400.
6 x 14400 = 86400.
8 x 6400 = 51200.
5 x 1200 = 6000.

What do 6, 12, 64, and 144 all have in common? They're all numerology used by the Illuminati! Remember, all the time that you spend on your Netbook, you are staring at those subliminal numbers through the screen display.

 

[Hokulele]

Please don't nominate that crap. It is a desecration of the people's memories that died that day.

Seconded.

 

[Athyrio]

Still following the No Flu Shot thread on LCF and came across this the other day but it didn't make any sense to me, so I thought it had something to do with the brandy I was drinking. I just read it again and it still makes no sense.

People are convinced that Vaccines may cause Autism and the medical profession says that is a Strawman argument against vaccination. I would say this is like finding a Haystack in the Needle! The public is reassured now by a slightly different straw man who stuffed their scrubs with straw, as if the very Scarecrow themselves inject fear yet simultaneously state that there is nothing to fear. I personally would rather err on the side of caution.

Isn't there a Stundie hiding in that paragraph somewhere?

 

[Horatius]

Isn't there a Stundie hiding in that paragraph somewhere?

You mean, besides his complete lack of understanding what a "strawman" argument is, and his overly abundant straw-related imagery?

Nope, nary a Stundie to be found, other than all of that.

 

[Mel Odious]

Please don't nominate that crap. It is a desecration of the people's memories that died that day.
Thanks.

<~~ Steps off soapbox.

But, I understand where you are coming from.

Agreed. This garbage is a slap in the face to triforcharity and everyone else who lived through that horrific day.

 

[triforcharity]

We lived, and people can insult me all they want, I couldn't care less.

Its the victims who left family, friends, wives, husbands, daughters, sons, nieces, nephews, etc. etc. etc. behind that day.

Like I said, I don't really care if they insult me, but leave the families alone.

(Incidentally, I am also a surviving family member, as my 2 uncles died that day, but I have thick skin)

 

[Klimax]

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=82366


[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/images/smilies/doglaugh.gif[/qimg]

Reality of physical size -fail.
Reality of bad drivers -> no webcam - fail.

Yet best is still screen size = illuminaty plot...