I am going to talk to some rocks after wading through this failed truther junk
No a real scientist will construct this line of logic:
The aim of the experiment is to determine whether thermite was present.
The thermite reaction contains its own oxygen source.
The material if it is thermitic will contain its own oxygen source.
Therefore in order to determine if the material is thermitic it must be analyzed to determine if it has its own oxygen source.
Since Harrit et al. clearly show a very large amount of O in the form of iron oxide intimately mixed with Al clearly the material is thermitic.
Rust? Rust proves what? This is funny you support liars on 911 issues with nothing but your own opinion. You failed to read the paper because in the paper the energy they found in the stuff they burned was not the same value as found in thermite. They found three different values. The fact is they found dust with some Al, rust, and other elements not used in thermite and they claim it is thermite which was used to destroy the WTC. This delusional logic is standard for the paranoid conspiracy theorists who wrote the paper trying to back in false evidence to support their failed conclusion thermite was used to destroy the WTC.
What is your favorite thermite chemical formula? Why is jet fuel ten times the energy of thermite? Why is does paper have more energy than thermite? Why use thermite when you can set fire to multiple floors in the WTC with a 250,000 pound jet going 590 mph with 66,000 pounds of jet fuel with the heat energy of 315 TONS of TNT!? Hello super-nano-liar believers?
Why did the terrorist use planes with jet fuel instead of sacks of thermite? This is the dumbest movement I have seen.
The aim of the experiment was to fake data and make the conclusion thermite was there so they can make the conclusion thermite was used to destroy the WTC; them made it up to fool other people so their ideas will prevail. They have failed to get anyone to act on their paper because it is bogus junk.
This is chemistry, if you are going to say the energy of the sample was less, less, and more energy than is in thermite you don't have thermite. My goodness there contents of the WTC have more energy than an equal weight of thermite; why do you need to follow liars into the dark pit of anti-intellectual total ignorance on 911?
It is sad the idiots doing the paper failed to get the right numbers for the energy in their samples. Since the paper is a scam anyway, why did they fail to fake the numbers and say it was exactly the same energy as thermite? Jones said there is thermite, Jones made up thermite, Jones is a failure on this topic and this is not the first time Jones has lied to make up evidence for his moronic delusion.
Please explain why their samples failed to be the same energy as thermite?
rock results in...
Not one rock supported the failed paper. Rocks found to be better judges of Jones' failed paper than truthers. I spent some of this morning gathering the rocks around my yard to have a conference on 911 and found that the rocks are better informed on 911 than the standard truther. That is the truth. Found some iron in my back yard, and some Al, and some of the iron was rusted; the rocks did not say it was thermite; rocks found to be smarter on thermite than Jones. Nothing new at the beachnut backyard river-rock roundup!
