My position on the bunnycaust is that I will believe that it happened if somebody can demonstrate it to me that it happened.
The flaw, as I see it, is that you think that the burden of proof is on us. Dare I say,
fair enough? You
MAY have a point, but, first of all, the burden is on you to prove something else first:
that all the scholars and other 'affirmers', are conspiring to lie.
You are somewhat correct that it is wrong for us to ask you to prove something you deny happened. You won't accept any documents because they're all "fraud", and we don't yet posses the means to build a time machine. Such an event as this isn't intuitive nor obvious, and a great deal of study is needed to conjecture on either side. However,
and this is KEY, what you DO ATTEST is that there is a massive conspiracy at play here, and this is strongly in the affirmative.
So, the burden of proof is on YOU. If you can somehow prove that all these people, and all their evidence is all bogus, then I may lend an ear.
But until then, arguing with you is POINTLESS.
(I apologize if someone brought this up already, I cared not to read 11 pages of this troll, since he asserted early on that he "has all the answers" and that he is only looking to tear down arguments, not learn from them. This is a great resource as an example of how
not to reason, however)