9/11-investigator explains the Holocaust

[dafydd]

I can't believe people actually dignify with response the disgusting bilgewater of the likes of 9/11 investigator, who is so isolated and neurotic that he/she craves even abuse to the contemptuous disregard with which most people ignore him and his ilk.

Yes,it's about time that we all put that mental pygmy on ignore.

 

[Jontg]

And he vanishes completely, right on cue--do you think there was a central intelligence behind this mild case of the Nazis, or did they all show up at once by sheer coincidence?

 

[9/11-investigator]

Oh really?

"The establishment of a Polish state is often identified with the adoption of Christianity by its ruler Mieszko I, in 966 (see Baptism of Poland), when the state covered territory similar to that of present-day Poland. In 1025, Poland became a kingdom and in 1569, it cemented a long association with the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, by signing the Union of Lublin, forming the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. The Commonwealth collapsed in 1795 and Poland's territory was partitioned among the Kingdom of Prussia, the Russian Empire, and Austria. Poland regained its independence as the Second Polish Republic in 1918, after World War I, but was later occupied by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union during World War II. Poland lost over six million citizens in World War II, emerging several years later as the socialist People's Republic of Poland within the Eastern Bloc, under strong Soviet influence."

Neo-Nazis aren't very good with ANY history, now are they?

You know perfectly well that I meant the period until 1918; that does not include all eternity. Jews are very good at twisting words of people they take for 'Neo-Nazis' (meaning any European proud of his heritage).

On a more positive note, even the BBC now chimes in on the big revisionist wave now underway, thanks to the internet:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8234000/8234106.stm

The BBC starts to doubt the merits of Churchill being 'the man of the century' he is held for by some and they list a number of his largest blunders. His crimes, like ordering the bombing of civilian targets in Germany before the Germans were forced to retaliate, are not mentioned yet.

It's a start, nevertheless.

 

[9/11-investigator]

I can't believe people actually dignify with response the disgusting bilgewater of the likes of 9/11 investigator, who is so isolated and neurotic that he/she craves even abuse to the contemptuous disregard with which most people ignore him and his ilk.

I'll go if you can provide me with the name with proof of one person who was gassed at Auschwitz. So not 1 million, as the story goes, but only one. We are now in page 40 of this thread and still you guys keep me waiting.

I am not satisfied with the quality of your work.

 

[oldhat]

You know perfectly well that I meant the period until 1918; that does not include all eternity. Jews are very good at twisting words fo people they take for Neo-Nazis (=any European proud of his heritage).

The joos are to blame for you not knowing anything about Poland...

 

[Toke]

His crimes, like ordering the bombing of civilian targets in Germany before the Germans were forced to retaliate, are not mentioned yet.

Are you talking about getting the germans to bomb london instead of something that would have made military sense?

 

[9/11-investigator]

And he vanishes completely, right on cue--do you think there was a central intelligence behind this mild case of the Nazis, or did they all show up at once by sheer coincidence?

You can forget about me vanishing. The point is I have a life and this forum is only a tiny part of that. I have given myself a year to get acquainted with the most important aspects of the holocaust and unless I am kicked out by the mods or that you guys resort to the white flag dream scenario in putting me collectively on ignore (meaning throwing the towel in the ring) you have to confront me and your own ignorance.

 

[9/11-investigator]

Are you talking about getting the germans to bomb london instead of something that would have made military sense?

You are missing the point, the Germans never had any military designs on Britain. That's why Hitler let escape the British from Dunkirk (there never was a miracle of Dunkirk) and that's why Hess flew to Scotland in order to propose a peace-deal. For reasons somewhat mysterious to me Hitler admired the British and their empire.

It were not the evil Nazi's who started WW2, it were those nice British folk who did that, continuing the habit they developed in WW1. And it were they who started the terror bombing campaign.

http://www.heretical.com/miscellx/blitz.html
http://globalfire.tv/nj/05en/history/the_blitz.htm

Tonight Germany took revenge for the British Blitz by demolishing the British on the socker field, as usual, they do that on any occasion.

http://www.spiegel.de/sport/fussball/0,1518,648276,00.html

The only way for the Brits to beat the Germans is to go and get help from bullies like the Americans and the Russians.

Famous English folk wisdom: "Soccer is a game with 22 people and in the end the Germans win. "

 

[Uzzy]

And again..

Wielun - 1st September 1939
Frampol - 13th September 1939
Rotterdam - 14th May 1940
London - 24th August 1940

The first time RAF Bomber Command attacked Germany was after Rotterdam, and the first bombing of Berlin was on the 25th August 1940. As Sir Arthur Harris said..

The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everyone else, and nobody was going to bomb them. At Rotterdam, London, Warsaw, and half a hundred other places, they put their rather naive theory into operation. They sowed the wind, and now they are going to reap the whirlwind.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Arthur_Harris,_1st_Baronet#cite_note-11

I'm curious. What planet do you spend the majority of your time on, given you think that the 25th of August 1940 took place before the 1st of September 1939?

 

[Uzzy]

And bringing up Football, are we? Should I mention the whole 1966 World Cup Final? Or the 5-1 whupping we gave the Germans on 1st September 2001. Either way, it's pretty odd to bring up Football in a debate about World War 2.

 

[Thunder]

Jews are very good at twisting words of people they take for 'Neo-Nazis' (meaning any European proud of his heritage).

ahhh!!! so if you are not a Neo-Nazi...then you are not proud of your European heritage?

if you do not love Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime..then you are a traitor to the European culture and people?

lolol!!!!!!!

there is nothing wrong with...and I encourage people to be....proud of being Irish, Scottish, German, French, Russian, Greek, Italian, Sicilian, Spanish, Swedish, etc etc.

only Neo-Nazis are proud of being European? give me a ****ing break. that is one of the stupidest statements you have ever made.

I am a Jew..and I am proud of my Czech heritage. Especially the Benes Decrees.

 

[ddt]

It were not the evil Nazi's who started WW2, it were those nice British folk who did that, continuing the habit they developed in WW1. And it were they who started the terror bombing campaign.

I can only echo Uzzy's reply here. You neglect all evidence brought forward to the contrary.

Tonight Germany took revenge for the British Blitz by demolishing the British on the socker field, as usual, they do that on any occasion.

http://www.spiegel.de/sport/fussball/0,1518,648276,00.html

So all you got to offer is football things. Did you read the article:

Einfach cool. Das war ein hart umkämpftes Match

So who won on the language front? The German language is fast on its way to be thoroughly anglicized.

Famous English folk wisdom: "Soccer is a game with 22 people and in the end the Germans win. "

[/quote]
That's Dutch folk wisdom. See 1974.

And bringing up Football, are we? Should I mention the whole 1966 World Cup Final?

And don't forget this unforgettable quote from sportswriter Mulchrone:

Mulchrone said of Horst and Co., "West Germany may beat us at our national sport today, but that would only be fair. We beat them twice at theirs."

 

[Thunder]

It were not the evil Nazi's who started WW2, it were those nice British folk who did that, continuing the habit they developed in WW1.

I forgot..it was the British who invaded Poland.

It was the British who took the Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia.

It was the British who stripped the Jews, the Socialists, the Communists, the handicapped, the homosexuals, the Democrats, and others of all civil rights.

It was the British who revved up their industry to make enough tanks and weapons to conquer Europe.

 

[dudalb]

You can forget about me vanishing. The point is I have a life and this forum is only a tiny part of that. I have given myself a year to get acquainted with the most important aspects of the holocaust and unless I am kicked out by the mods or that you guys resort to the white flag dream scenario in putting me collectively on ignore (meaning throwing the towel in the ring) you have to confront me and your own ignorance.

Yeah, you are REALLY winning people over to your disgusting point of view.

 

[Thunder]

You can forget about me vanishing. .

That's nice. I think Peter Stuyvesant was a Jew. I mean...look at that nose!!!

and what's the Dutch giving up New Amsterdam without putting up even the slightest bit of a fight? what a bunch of pussies.

 

[Moss]

You want one victim of Auschwitz-Birkenau?
Have some:
Georg Hermann
Hermann Haber
Gertrud Kolmar
Philipp Manes
Estella Agsteribbe
Robert Danneberg
Heinrich Fulda
Karel Poláček
Rosebery d'Arguto
Angela Autsch
Regina Jonas
Edith Stein
Maximilian Kolbe
Dagobert Biermann
etc.

And yeah, Rotterdam looked pretty whole in 1940, didn't it?

 

[dudalb]

DP

 

[dudalb]

Oh, I would LOVE to see 9/11 Investigator try to peddle his "THe Nazis were the Good guys and the Allies were Evil" to senior citizens in the Netherlands who are old enough to remember what really happened. It would be a awful lot like a 9/11 Conspiracy kook trying to peddle his crap at a FDNY engine house.

 

[Jontg]

Face it, Investigator, you've run out of ammunition. The only things you've "disproven" are a handful of common misconceptions that anyone who's actually studied the real history behind the Shoah--oh, excuse me, I mean the official story spoon-fed to the brainwashed masses by the Jew-controlled media--knows are wrong. Any fool can find out for themselves that a good chunk of the people you rounded up died of typhus, overwork, and general abuse--but these conditions only existed in camps you set up specifically to inflict them on the inmates. And then, when you knew you were losing the war and decided that they weren't dying fast enough for your tastes, you applied that lovely ingenuity to methods of speeding it up. The carbon monoxide vans' existence is a matter of public record, as are the gas chambers--which, and I say this with such precise language because it slid right over your head the last time I mentioned it, could not by any stretch of the imagination have been used to delouse clothing. The sheer size of the rooms would make such a claim ridiculous, even before one looks at the forensic evidence: Zyklon-B leaves one distinct form of chemical trace when it's used to kill lice, and a very different one when it's used to kill people. The amount and concentration of Zyklon-B used at Auschwitz-Birkenau was all wrong for the former use, and if you turned it on today it would not delouse a sock--but I dare you to step into that room yourself and let Parky throw the switch. We'd all be amused by the results.

 

[stilicho]

[The] Germans never had any military designs on Britain.

Can you reconcile this statement with the fact that the Germans occupied the Channel Islands? It appears that the Nazi war machine was rather geared towards occupying anything it could reach successfully by land, sea or air.

I won't guide you to written evidence that disputes your ostentatious claim because you won't read it anyway.

But you cannot ignore the facts.