9/11-investigator explains the Holocaust

[Uninvolved]

The Holocaust shareholders, particularly the B'nai Brownshirts of North America have a special view of the freedom of expression.

Quite to the contrary, you're quite free to publish whatever poorly written, shoddily researched piece of garbage you want by your local vanity press in the US.

Misinterpretation of messages is a typical tool of the exterminationists. The lack of reading comprehension is obvious in some cases, but my impression is, that the misinterpretation is intentional in most cases; its most typical use is divertion from the subject of the misinterpreted message - just like in this case.

 

[NoZed Avenger]

The Holocaust shareholders, particularly the B'nai Brownshirts of North America have a special view of the freedom of expression:

You say "Brownshirts" here as if it were a bad thing.

Which, given your earlier postings, somewhat surprises me.

 

[Jontg]

Ooh, it's so fun to watch them fall apart--once we recover from the initial paroxysms of revulsion and loathing that their presence provokes, they swiftly run out of canards to throw around, and all they have left is posturing and invective. Notice how, now that we have our game together and make coherent arguments rather than KRONK SMASH PUNY NAZIS and similar, they've swiftly gone from smugly superior to blustering at our every word and insulting the heritage and nationality of everyone within reach. It's almost as satisfying as the Donny Donowitz school of debunking.

 

[dudalb]

I see the Uninvolved is now using all the Denier rhetoric..."exterminationalist",etc.

 

[oldhat]

Misinterpretation of messages is a typical tool of the exterminationists.

It must be such a lonely world being an internet crank. I bet at times it feels like no one understands or cares what the hell you're talking about...

 

[Trojan]

Misinterpretation of messages is a typical tool of the exterminationists. The lack of reading comprehension is obvious in some cases, but my impression is, that the misinterpretation is intentional in most cases; its most typical use is divertion from the subject of the misinterpreted message - just like in this case.

How does one become a Holocaust share holder? Is it listed on the NYSE?

 

[Thunder]

That's because you are a sloppy reader. I said that Poland did not exist prior to 1918. A fact easily verified.

Oh really?

"The establishment of a Polish state is often identified with the adoption of Christianity by its ruler Mieszko I, in 966 (see Baptism of Poland), when the state covered territory similar to that of present-day Poland. In 1025, Poland became a kingdom and in 1569, it cemented a long association with the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, by signing the Union of Lublin, forming the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. The Commonwealth collapsed in 1795 and Poland's territory was partitioned among the Kingdom of Prussia, the Russian Empire, and Austria. Poland regained its independence as the Second Polish Republic in 1918, after World War I, but was later occupied by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union during World War II. Poland lost over six million citizens in World War II, emerging several years later as the socialist People's Republic of Poland within the Eastern Bloc, under strong Soviet influence."

Neo-Nazis aren't very good with ANY history, now are they?

 

[Thunder]

Misinterpretation of messages is a typical tool of the exterminationists. .

Boldfaced lies are the MO of Holocaust-deniers.

 

[SpitfireIX]

Of course he was a British citizen, but he had an American mother, who likely was Jewish. According to the Jewish rules that would make Churchill a Jew (in this vision half Jews don't exist, you are Jewish or not).

You and your cohorts really shouldn't parrot Irving; you just end up looking even more foolish. Irving based his claim of Churchill's Jewish ancestry on a single newspaper article (payment required) in The Jerusalem Post, which reads, in relevant part:

THANK God - at last we know the truth about Winston Churchill: he was a psychopathic revanchist, obsessed with defeating Germany in World War II, thus preventing Adolf Hitler from saving civilization from the Red menace. Several rational British historical revisionists have just revealed this, half a century after Churchill inflicted all that pain and grief on those poor Germans. . . .

Or is it a related idiosyncrasy that bothers those revisionists? I mean the streak that caused Churchill to draw on Jewish - particularly biblical - modes and language, especially regarding the treatment of enemies like Hitler and Mussolini. Are they particularly galled by his penchant for calling on God, despite his rejection of "the Christian or any other form of religious belief" (as he wrote to his mother in 1898)? And with typical Churchillian cunning, he did all that in the name of "Christian civilization"... (That cunning no doubt came to Churchill in the Jewish genes transmitted by his mother, Lady Randolph Churchill, nee Jenny Jacobson/Jerome. ) [bolding mine]

This is clearly sarcasm, and in any case no source is provided. Further, here is ancestry.com's information on Churchill's great-grandparents, Isaac and Aurora Jerome (subscription required for full information). Note that prior to 1850 only heads of household were listed on the census form. As you can see, Churchill's grandfather was clearly born (1817) Leonard Walter Jerome, and did not change his name from Jacobson.

 

[Skeptic]

You say "Brownshirts" here as if it were a bad thing.

Which, given your earlier postings, somewhat surprises me.

Well, that's denier's logic for you: they won't stand for the fascist Jews and racist Israel defaming the Nazi movement!

Same logic that makes them so suspicious of the Nuremberg trials. What a travesty of justice: the Allies, after the war, by some curious coincidence got together in the prisoners' dock the only 22 people in Germany who were totally innocent, knew nothing about anything, and were completely powerless. Just read the defendants' statements and you'll see that's true! Such a shame they were not believed.

 

[Skeptic]

This is clearly sarcasm.

Well, you can't blame those folks for not getting sarcasm. Understanding sarcasm requires intelligence, and they're not too smart, just between you and me.

Of course, Spitfire IX, we're laughing now... we won't be laughing when the long-delayed Dutch invasion comes across the Atlantic, to topple the USA's Judeo-communist control of the world...

 

[Skeptic]

I used to think the Communists' conquest of half of Europe had something to do with Hitler's invasion of the USSR, or with Ribbentrop's earlier Nazi-Soviet pact which gave them half of Poland (and the Baltic states too, IIRC).

But apparently I was misinformed: it was all the fault of that well-known Jewish communist sympathizer, Churchill.

 

[GlennB]

That's because you are a sloppy reader. I said that Poland did not exist prior to 1918. A fact easily verified.

Not easily verified at all. It's wrong

I have noticed that sense of respect for freedom of speech is far better developed in the Americas then on that sad wet Island of yours. How many camera's did you folks have installed again?

The Netherlands

There is no specific legislation against Holocaust denial in the Netherlands, but public utterances of this kind are still illegal. They fall under the Dutch criminal law banning racial abuse and incitement to hatred (Articles 137c and 137d of the Dutch Penal Code).

 

[SpitfireIX]

Of course, Spitfire IX, we're laughing now... we won't be laughing when the long-delayed Dutch invasion comes across the Atlantic, to topple the USA's Judeo-communist control of the world...

 

[dafydd]

Oh really?

"The establishment of a Polish state is often identified with the adoption of Christianity by its ruler Mieszko I, in 966 (see Baptism of Poland), when the state covered territory similar to that of present-day Poland. In 1025, Poland became a kingdom and in 1569, it cemented a long association with the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, by signing the Union of Lublin, forming the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. The Commonwealth collapsed in 1795 and Poland's territory was partitioned among the Kingdom of Prussia, the Russian Empire, and Austria. Poland regained its independence as the Second Polish Republic in 1918, after World War I, but was later occupied by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union during World War II. Poland lost over six million citizens in World War II, emerging several years later as the socialist People's Republic of Poland within the Eastern Bloc, under strong Soviet influence."

Neo-Nazis aren't very good with ANY history, now are they?

But they are good at dragging their knuckles along the ground as they walk.The more intelligent ones can chew gum at the same time.

 

[Uzzy]

I've called him on the Poland issue twice before now. No response. I'm unsurprised to see him keep it up.

 

[SpitfireIX]

I've called him on the Poland issue twice before now. No response. I'm unsurprised to see him keep it up.

Same here. He just doesn't care. Apparently he believes that Poland had no right to exist because Russia, Austria, and Prussia had "stolen it fair and square."

 

[Simon39759]

At this point, I believe, the pestering racist hatred that 9/11 uses has a substitute for a philosophy has been quite thoroughly elucidated, as, I would say, were the vacuity of his argument and the breadth of his wilful ignorance of all thing historical in favour of self-serving aggrandizing fantasies.

So, I think, the thread has reach its initial objective, organized a nice family picnic on its summit and has little more to do than thread back the way it came.

So, I shall continue my policy of ignoring the bile-filled midget and advise everybody to do the same, after all, the point has been made and only 9/11's imperviousness to all thing real is preventing him to see it.

 

[babbits]

I can't believe people actually dignify with response the disgusting bilgewater of the likes of 9/11 investigator, who is so isolated and neurotic that he/she craves even abuse to the contemptuous disregard with which most people ignore him and his ilk.

 

[Thunder]

Oh really?

"The establishment of a Polish state is often identified with the adoption of Christianity by its ruler Mieszko I, in 966 (see Baptism of Poland), when the state covered territory similar to that of present-day Poland. In 1025, Poland became a kingdom and in 1569, it cemented a long association with the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, by signing the Union of Lublin, forming the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. The Commonwealth collapsed in 1795 and Poland's territory was partitioned among the Kingdom of Prussia, the Russian Empire, and Austria. Poland regained its independence as the Second Polish Republic in 1918, after World War I, but was later occupied by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union during World War II. Poland lost over six million citizens in World War II, emerging several years later as the socialist People's Republic of Poland within the Eastern Bloc, under strong Soviet influence."

Neo-Nazis aren't very good with ANY history, now are they?

Poland didn't exist before 1918 huh 9-11 Investigator?

wanna retract that false statement?