• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

No plane hole in the pentagon?

brantc

Muse
brantc
Joined
Feb 14, 2009
Messages
541
Can someone please explain why the Pentagon does not have a hole the size of the hole in the side of the towers?????

Composite Pentagon and WTC
7jpy0109cf

http://www.box.net/shared/7jpy0109cf

And wheres the plane??
 
if this is the hole that was on the INSIDE (ring E) of the Pentagon, i suggest that you do a bit of a SEARCH. as it has been dealt with 3 years ago. Please join us in 2009..
 
Vastly different construction techniques and materials for starters. Real life isn't a roadrunner cartoon with Wil E Coyote shaped cut outs.
 
The outline of where the plane hit is wrong; it hit much lower on the building. If you look at this picture you will get a better idea of the real size of the hole.
 
brantc said:
And wheres the plane??
Click to expand...
where is the missle? where did the missle come from?

Why did the eyewitnesses see a plane crash and not a missle?

why is there debris from airplane all over the crash site?

why were bodyparts from passengers on 93 found?
 
To the OP, friend, you seem to have stepped into a time warp. Even (some) Truthers have acknowledged that the Pentagon impact is consistent in size with an aircraft.

The hole is slightly smaller than the ones in the Towers, true, but that's because it was hit by a smaller aircraft. Hope that helps.
 
Not to mention one was stone, and designed much stronger, and one was aluminum and steel, with many voids.
 
Wow, been a while since I saw a truther show up with some a stupid, debunked talking point.

2006 indeed!
 
firecoins said:
where is the missle? where did the missle come from?

Why did the eyewitnesses see a plane crash and not a missle?

why is there debris from airplane all over the crash site?

why were bodyparts from passengers on 93 found?
Click to expand...

I believe that ALL the impact witnesses were government Shills. All 100-plus of them. The witnesses who saw only a plane were mostly honest citizens.
 
Last edited:
R.Mackey said:
To the OP, friend, you seem to have stepped into a time warp. Even (some) Truthers have acknowledged that the Pentagon impact is consistent in size with an aircraft.

The hole is slightly smaller than the ones in the Towers, true, but that's because it was hit by a smaller aircraft. Hope that helps.
Click to expand...

Didn''t you notice in the recent Naational Geographic show that they accept that the initial hole in the Pentagon was only 14-16 feet in dimeter ?
 
bill smith said:
Didn''t you notice in the recent Naational Geographic show that they accept that the initial hole in the Pentagon was only 14-16 feet in dimeter ?
Click to expand...
Do you accept that the diameter of a 757 fuselage is 12 feet?
 
bill smith said:
I believe that ALL the impact witnesses were government Shills. All 100-plus of them. The witnesses who saw only a plane were mostly honest citizens.
Click to expand...


As I mentioned in another thread, there are five year olds who believe clouds are made out of cotton candy, that doesn't mean Meteorologists are obliged to take those conjectures seriously.
 
bill smith said:
I believe that ALL the impact witnesses were government Shills. All 100-plus of them. The witnesses who saw only a plane were mostly honest citizens.
Click to expand...

Can I ask a serious question?

Are you for real or just joking around? Because you are seriously hilarious in a Spinal Tap sort of way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom