Merged National Geographic Special - "9/11 Science and Conspiracy" Debunks Thermite Myth

dtugg said:
True. However, this moron was on it:

[qimg]http://911guide.googlepages.com/Gagebox-full.jpg/Gagebox-full-full.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Gage is not an effective public speaker, but that in no way adds support for the official story or the ridiculous experiments on the show.
 
longfellow said:
I'll ask again. If "9/11 conspiracy is so predominate" then why is it that the proponents of said conspiracy theory who have been banned here see the need to create multiple sock-puppets to continue posting?

If it is as prevalent as you claim, how come only a handful of people see the need to troll about it on this board?
Click to expand...

Very good question.
 
RedIbis said:
Gage is not an effective public speaker, but that in no way adds support for the official story or the ridiculous experiments on the show.
Click to expand...

Not an effective speaker? Who cares about that? What about his cardboard box experiment? And you call the experiments on the special ridiculous?
 
RedIbis said:
Gage is not an effective public speaker, but that in no way adds support for the official story or the ridiculous experiments on the show.
Click to expand...

I agree that Gage isn't an effective public speaker but the cardboard box fiasco proves that he is a ****ing idiot. And so is anybody who listens to him. While I agree that doesn't support the "official story" it does discredit him, and 9/11 twoof in general since he is considered to be one of the twoofer morons' leaders.
 
TexasJack said:
Not an effective speaker? Who cares about that? What about his cardboard box experiment? And you call the experiments on the special ridiculous?
Click to expand...

I didn't see any cardboard box experiments on the special. I saw some ridiculous ones by NatGeo that didn't prove anything;
 
Forget experiments, we've got the freaking DNA of the passengers.

Red will never acknowledge that. What a shame.
 
So, red, using your logic, you can compare the WTC to ANAY ONE of the following, and its PERFECTLY reasonable??

Pizza Boxes
Lemons
Coffee Cups
Spagetti Noodles
Chicken Wire cages
Cardboard Boxes

All but the last two can be attributed to heiwa.
 
dtugg said:
I agree that Gage isn't an effective public speaker but the cardboard box fiasco proves that he is a ****ing idiot. And so is anybody who listens to him. While I agree that doesn't support the "official story" it does discredit him, and 9/11 twoof in general since he is considered to be one of the twoofer morons' leaders.
Click to expand...

So then by the same logic, the NatGeo people are idiots as well since their experiments were ridiculous.
 
Yes, how dare they see if fire can damage steel or see if thermite can cut through a steel column.
 
Last edited:
How DARE they actually test something with ACTUAL construction materials!! HOW DARE THEY!!!! /sarcasm
 
RedIbis said:
So then by the same logic, the NatGeo people are idiots as well since their experiments were ridiculous.
Click to expand...

You can call them anything you want, but Gage and co. are the leaders of your cult who are trying to overturn the status quo. Don't you think they are failing miserably?
 
ImANiceGuy said:
Just look at the executive producer, Erik Nelson, a career writer/producer since 1980. He also lists "L.A. 10,000 B.C. (2004)" and "Monsters: Put to the Test (2003) on his resume.(imbd.com) A quick gloss/glaze on his page and I see several CT documentaries listed.....I'm sure Kevin Ryan could find a connection.
Click to expand...

That's called an ad hominem. You can't find anything relevant to say against the content of the show, so instead you try and find something to attack the reputation of one of the producers.

Well done. :rolleyes:

Do you think he ever considered for a single instant the possibility that the CT's he would examine could be verified instead of falsified?
Click to expand...
That's your job, and we're still waiting.

The medium is the message - McLuhan
Click to expand...
Look who's talking, all you've got are crummy home made videos on youtube.


ImANiceGuy said:
CHF, it can be incorrect to mistake tv shows for investigations.

It's the actual investigations that refute CT's.
Click to expand...

Nobody is stopping you, what are you waiting for, get going with that investigation already. Are you just waiting for other people to do it for you?

National Geographic has done more with one show (that probably didn't cost too much) than the entire TM in eight years.
 
Last edited:
RedIbis said:
I didn't see any cardboard box experiments on the special. I saw some ridiculous ones by NatGeo that didn't prove anything;
Click to expand...

other than that a jet fuel fire will cause steel to deform in under 4 minutes.

other than that even with 140 lbs of thermite, it couldn't cut through or weaken a steel beam..

you are sooooo right, it didn't prove anything.

They didn't make super duper nano (it will clean your room, make dinner and even fold your clothes) thermite... because they didn't need to.

try again twoofie
 
WUBRINY63 said:
I missed that part. What the heck does it matter though? I saw enough. How pathetic? It's all so sad that 9/11 conspiracy is so predominate to begin with. It's the same with what has been going on with all this crap coming out about the interrogations.

I wonder if a conspiracy theory had come out that the CIA was actually using a guillotine on enemy combatants, and it was later found to be untrue, if that would have been enough to not look into the interrogations a little more. Did they miss the boat on that one?

Most of this debunking is irrelevant to the event of 9/11 anyway. I just wonder why so many are so afraid of questions. Why are debunkers so invested? It's like a full time job for some of them here. Just look at how many different times a day some of them post. When do they sleep? When do they go to work? Are they changing anyone's mind though? No.

That's why NG or someone else will try to cash in on it. There has been no real investigation into 9/11. There are still so many unanswered questions. Thus all the jackals. It's wide open for interpretation and wild conspiracy theories. What more proof is needed that the debunkers have had no effect at all?

I await the next 9/11 conspiracy special. It will never end.
Click to expand...

nice try troll baiter.

TAM:)
 
Pardalis said:
Forget experiments, we've got the freaking DNA of the passengers.

Red will never acknowledge that. What a shame.
Click to expand...

It is not that he doesn't acknowledge it. He simply pulls out the good old truther disclaimer/out clause...

When presented with evidence that refutes your theory, CLAIM IT WAS FAKED OR PLANTED.

TAM:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom