• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

9/11-investigator is right about the Holocaust

Status
Not open for further replies.
ddt said:
And I have no intention of going that way
Click to expand...

You posted earlier

Anyone with some basic knowledge of the history of the period can spot the misrepresentations
Click to expand...

i.e. you have no intention to explain your accusation. Your spinelessness is noticable even among this bunch of Holocaust activists.
 
parky76 said:
i.e. you have no intention to explain your accusation. Your spinelessness is noticable even among this bunch of Holocaust activists.
Click to expand...
please attempt to debunk the fact that all reliable census data shows a decrease of at least 5 million Jews between 1938 and 1945
Click to expand...
Parky, again! My post was addressed to ddt and it had nothing to do with the number of Jewish victims; in fact, it had nothing to do with the Holocaust at all!

Pls see my post #125 in this very thread; that is the origin of this particular dispute.
 
Uninvolved said:
i.e. you have no intention to explain your accusation. Your spinelessness is noticable even among this bunch of Holocaust activists.
Click to expand...

Apropos spinelessness, do you care to answer my question:
ddt said:
You have no problem with the Holocaust. So you agree it happened, and you're glad for it?
Click to expand...
or otherwise explain your stand on the Holocaust?
 
Uninvolved said:
Parky, again! My post was addressed to ddt and it had nothing to do with the number of Jewish victims; in fact, it had nothing to do with the Holocaust at all!

Pls see my post #125 in this very thread; that is the origin of this particular dispute.
Click to expand...
Which didn't involve the Holocaust, yet, in your follow-up to my reaction you introduced the Holocaust. How can you blame parky for thinking you can't wait to discuss the Holocaust?

Come on, are you afraid of the topic?

Tell us, how many Jews were killed by the Nazis in the Holocaust?
 
ddt said:
Tell us, how many Jews were killed by the Nazis in the Holocaust?
Click to expand...

Why would the Germans kill Jews? The Germans are good, honest, gentle people. They would never kill Jews.

..even though the Jews had it coming.
 
9/11-investigator said:
You are probably referring to the so-called 'Phony War', the period that not much happened after the declaration of war of France and Britain after Hitler took back his land that was stolen from Germany by the Allies in Versailles.
Click to expand...

Was Germany at war with France and Britian in September 1939 - yes or no? If so, how did Churchill force these three nations to war when he had no political authority?
 
Trojan said:
Was Germany at war with France and Britian in September 1939 - yes or no? If so, how did Churchill force these three nations to war when he had no political authority?
Click to expand...

I realy have to spell it out for you. I repeat: there was a declaration of war. But there was no war. What part don't you understand?

BTW, I was thinking lately. Why would a hardcore holocaustian like you take a bicyle and drive to the local library to find this Red Cross report? Is there doubt creeping in Trojan? :D
 
9/11-investigator said:
I realy have to spell it out for you. I repeat: there was a declaration of war. But there was no war. What part don't you understand?

BTW, I was thinking lately. Why would a hardcore holocaustian like you take a bicyle and drive to the local library to find this Red Cross report? Is there doubt creeping in Trojan? :D
Click to expand...

Why are you trying to convince other people about holocaust denial? Is it because you doubt?

No, it's because you're an anti-intellectual who thinks that holding a controversial opinion makes you clever.
 
Twiler said:
Why are you trying to convince other people about holocaust denial? Is it because you doubt?

No, it's because you're an anti-intellectual who thinks that holding a controversial opinion makes you clever.
Click to expand...

I don't want to convince anybody. Instead I like a good verbal fight since I believe that truth emerges best from a verbal fight. It's how the truth finding courts operate.
 
9/11-investigator said:
Good God, don't you understand what is to be gained for a dying European Civilization if it can be shown that this Holocaust was largely a fraud...
Click to expand...

Lol. What's with you and your ridiculously hypothetical questions? Oh yeah, borrowing from the OP in this case anyway.

I could not care less about getting attention from you folks.
Click to expand...

Well you sure aren't trying hard to avoid it, coming here and spewing provocative anti-rational HD garbage and arguing heedlessly (but provocatively!) in circles just like so many other habitual time-wasters. No, you have to be at least neutral on getting the forum's attention.

I only say this because I must first address you once in order to properly put you on ignore as well. Good luck panicking "Western Civiilization" into erasing and then re-doing the holocaust (mentally at least).

Parky: The baby picture - just subjecting that cute little guy to 'Gator's diseaesd glare is creepy to me. FYI. The ignore approach was better, don't backslide, man!
 
9/11-investigator said:
I don't want to convince anybody. Instead I like a good verbal fight since I believe that truth emerges best from a verbal fight. It's how the truth finding courts operate.
Click to expand...

In other words, you're an anti-intellectual. Thanks for clearing that up.

Incidentally, "truth finding" courts don't allow liars to present false evidence without consequence, viz. David Irving v. Penguin Books and Deborah Lipstadt. Maybe "twoof finding" courts do, though.
 
9/11-investigator said:
I realy have to spell it out for you. I repeat: there was a declaration of war. But there was no war. What part don't you understand?

BTW, I was thinking lately. Why would a hardcore holocaustian like you take a bicyle and drive to the local library to find this Red Cross report? Is there doubt creeping in Trojan? :D
Click to expand...

The Red cross report? Whoops I suggest you should have checked on this source before you copied and pasted it on here as proof to your claims.

The "Red Cross Report" as you call it, was misrepresented and nit picked and twisted to add weight to Richard Harwood's infamous paper. He ignored critical sections of the original ICRC 1948 report. Key misiniterpretations by Harwood of this report include:

1) The notion that the gas chambers were disguised as showers, Harwood disputed this, by referencing articles where ICRC officials inspected bathing facilities. This was used to argue that the showers were just showers and were not an instrument of death. However the passage Harwood cited is in reference to Allied camps for civilians in Egypt and thus had nothing to do with Nazi gas chambers.

2) Harwood also cited an article from Die Tat, a Swiss tabloid newspaper, published statistics that concluded the amount of people who died in Nazi prisons and camps from 1939 to 1945 based on ICRC statistics was "300,000, not all of whom were Jews".

The January 19 1955 edition of Die Tat did indeed give a 300,000 figure, but this was only in reference to "Germans and German Jews" and not nationals of other countries.

In a 1979 response to this pamphlet, the ICRC said that they have "never tried to compile statistics on the victims of the war", nor "certified the accuracy of the statistics produced by a third party",and state that the authors of such material have "falsified" both claims that the document originates from the ICRC and refers exclusively to Jews.

As well as in personal correspondence, the ICRC has also addressed this misrepresentation by several other means. In 1975, the ICRC wrote to the Board of Deputies of British Jews in London regarding Harwood's citations, stating:

The figures cited by the author of the booklet are based upon statistics falsely attributed to us, evidently for the purpose of giving them credibility, despite the fact that we never publish information of this kind.

—Françoise Perret, Comité International de la Croix-Rouge, to Jacob Gerwitz, August 22, 1975.

This is a classic example of how cognitive dissonance can force the mind to create its own interpretations of fact and twist it into baseless lies.

So please peddle such theories, it only serves to paint you as a low grade researcheer who keenly copies and pastes false information without conducting any proper self research and verification.

Your post served the purpose of proving to the world how deep your bigotry runs, flowing with an abundance of irrational anti-semitisim and a good dose ignorance.
 
Uninvolved said:
I never denied it; however, your definition may vary from my one. See #1244 and following in the thread "9/11-investigator explains the Holocaust".
Click to expand...

Yes. Mine is the one in which millions of Jews were systematically exterminated by German state-sponsored action, including the establishment of special extermination camps such as Treblinka and special purpose gas chambers other camps.

I.e the one that actually happened and is supported in the historical record.

The one in which the Nazi high command are mass murderers and neo-Nazi Holocaust deniers are anti-Semitic apologists and accessories after the fact.

In other words, the correct one.
 
You know, around the time you repeat your fifth worn-out canard, everything you and the rest of these Nazi bastards say just sort of fades out. I'm sure you think you're saying actual words, but all I can hear is tink... tink... tink....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom