Merged National Geographic Special - "9/11 Science and Conspiracy" Debunks Thermite Myth

Lets hope so, for your sake.

After all, if the media doesn't tear you a new one they ignore you completely.

"911 Truth" , the Rodney Dangerfeild of media stories{I can't get any respect! i tell the media that 911 was an inside job and they ream me out. I tell them there were no planes and they ignore me.}
 
Last edited:
There certainly isn't many debunkers here parading this piece of entertainment out as some kind of victory. Is it embarrassing to debunkers that these types of shows are still being produced in 2009? Why is 9/11 conspiracy still so huge?
They've also done shows on bigfoot and UFOs. Truthers fit to this theme quite naturally.
 
Wtc7???

Did anyone see how they just glazed over WTC7???
Which was the single most outstanding smoking gun in this whole investigation?
 
did someone just get a whiff of the drive by troofer? woohoo boy.. that has been rotting for 7 years
 
Did anyone see how they just glazed over WTC7???
Which was the single most outstanding smoking gun in this whole investigation?

CIT mode on:

Did anyone see how they just glazed over the hand full of guys who erroneously said that the plane went North of Citgo???
Which was the single most outstanding smoking gun in this whole investigation?

CIT mode off

/Gee while I was in CIT mode I had an overwhelming urge to absolutely wreck an all you can eat buffet, while talking in pure Street, boo yah!
 
Gee while I was in CIT mode I had an overwhelming urge to absolutely wreck an all you can eat buffet, while talking in pure Street, boo yah!

then he did the troof-le shuffle
The20Goonies20-20Chunk20Truffle20Sh.gif
 
Historically 9/11 will always be revisited. This special wasn't doing that. This special focused on the very conspiracy theories that most debunkers claim are disrespectful to 9/11 victims and families. Will there be another one next year?

No, not at all. The ones that are disrespectful are the ones like, "They were in on it" and the like.

I cannot specualte on if there will be another one next year. The best source for that information would be NGC. They can be found here.

http://www.nationalgeographic.com/community/email.html
 
did someone just get a whiff of the drive by troofer? woohoo boy.. that has been rotting for 7 years

I think someone forgot to take out the trash. Who's week is it this week??


Anyway, welcome oh ignorant one. I would say the steel twisting into some crazy angle at 3:40 into the fire. Something that I personally thought would take more than 10 minutes. Then the 140 lbs. of thermite that did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to that column, didn't even scar it.
 
I was looking for the Nielsen ratings for this show. Top 20 numbers are not out yet. Anyone want to wager that Spongebob will beat out NG's show?
 
Did anyone see how they just glazed over WTC7???
Which was the single most outstanding smoking gun in this whole investigation?
Fire causes buildings to collapse. WTC 7 burned for twice as long as the fireproofing was rated to withstand.
 
Wow. Just watched it. That was absolutely horrible. If after 8 years this is the best that a very mainstream cable network can come up with to support the official story and debunk conspiracy theories, I can't imagine you guys ever coming up with something that will put an end to the debate.

If anything this just shows how difficult it is to prove the official story.
 
In Canada, Nov 11 is Remembrance Day and the History Ch. and the CBC have docs on WW1.
Movies are made every few years documenting events in WW1, WW2,Vietnam, The Boer War, etc.

I wonder what the need is to keep doing that?:rolleyes:

Because the government's official story of WWI has never been proven. If WWI were indeed trench warfare, then how did they get Homeland Insurgency's fat wife in there? I'd like a debunker to explain that to me.
 
I can't imagine you guys ever coming up with something that will put an end to the debate.

We'll add it to the list of commonplace things you can't imagine.

If anything this just shows how difficult it is to prove the official story.

It's always difficult to prove anything to people who won't listen to the proof and don't understand it if they do.

Dave
 

Back
Top Bottom