Merged National Geographic Special - "9/11 Science and Conspiracy" Debunks Thermite Myth

Well if they were ever torn apart why the need for yet another show on it?

Because watching you clowns squirm when proven wrong never gets old.

Thermite? Whatever. If it was ever proven that thermite was not present on 9/11 would it make your story true?

"Our story" is accepted by the engineering/demolition community. You're the one who needs to change that.

Tax dollars collected from war profits.

Tax dollars = government dollars. I guess that's your way of leaving an excuse for when the investigation doesn't come back with the right answers.

No immunity for anyone.

I repeat: WHO testifies?

A new full subpoena empowered commission.

Made up of WHO?
 
If your logic is true then you should want us to continue to discourage that investigation so that it will continue to grow.

I don't want it to grow. I want it answered. It grows on its own.

End what? Millions were already spent on the already-completed investigations. If you're not happy with those results then get out your checkbook and get to work on a new one.

Apparently plenty of people are not satisfied with what you call a complete investigation. National Geographic isn't producing specials on 9/11 conspiracy just to cater to the fringe. As far as my checkbook goes I pay my taxes.
 
Because watching you clowns squirm when proven wrong never gets old.



"Our story" is accepted by the engineering/demolition community. You're the one who needs to change that.



Tax dollars = government dollars. I guess that's your way of leaving an excuse for when the investigation doesn't come back with the right answers.



I repeat: WHO testifies?



Made up of WHO?


I answered your questions. I'm sorry you were counting on me to have no answer.
 
The fact that National Geographic is making a special about it 8 years later for one.


Um, 911 is coming up. I mean, on the History Channel they always show docs about D-Day around the start of June and Pearl Harbor around the start of December.
 
I take it then that you're refusing to define exactly who should be on "A new full subpoena empowered commission."

I figured that's what your new investigation would be like: government-funded and ultimately decided by....someone.

Yup, you're not leaving yourself any wiggle room, are you?
 
Um, 911 is coming up. I mean, on the History Channel they always show docs about D-Day around the start of June and Pearl Harbor around the start of December.

In Canada, Nov 11 is Remembrance Day and the History Ch. and the CBC have docs on WW1.
Movies are made every few years documenting events in WW1, WW2,Vietnam, The Boer War, etc.

I wonder what the need is to keep doing that?:rolleyes:
 
I don't want it to grow. I want it answered.

Is that why you're posting here?

Apparently plenty of people are not satisfied with what you call a complete investigation. National Geographic isn't producing specials on 9/11 conspiracy just to cater to the fringe.

They're probably producing it because the anniversary of 9/11 is coming up and it was an important event in our nations history.

As far as my checkbook goes I pay my taxes.

Most of the other people who pay their taxes aren't demanding a new investigation into 9/11. That puts your view in the minority.
 
Um, 911 is coming up. I mean, on the History Channel they always show docs about D-Day around the start of June and Pearl Harbor around the start of December.

So what year will they stop? Why wasn't it last year or the year before? Are debunkers reaching anyone? They weren't just doing a historical special on the event of 9/11. This was specifically about 9/11 conspiracy.
 
You dolts in the truth movement love to spout about the whole subpoena power thing.

Listen real carefully, I will go slow for you.

What would prevent them from still lying?? Is being under oath a magic spell that makes everyone tell the truth???

I mean, really, look at OJ Simpson, Scott Peterson, Charles Manson, Ted Bundy, lord knows THEY all told the truth when they were put under oath......
 
So, because the Holocaust happened 60 + years ago, we shouldn't revisit it??

Same thing with pearl Harbour, and the entire Cold War, and the Cuban Missle Crisis, the invasion of Japan, etc. etc. etc. Do you think that just because its in the past, we just shouldn't explore it more and more?? Especially now that we have the technology that we have, we can explore those events even more than we could even 10 years ago.
 
Are debunkers reaching anyone?

anyone with cable tv.

who are the truthers reaching?

:D

we got National Geographic, Penn and Teller, Discovery Channel, the BBC, and PBS on our side.

you guys got....er....Willy Nelson and Rosie O'Donnel.

lololol!!!
 
Last edited:
So, because the Holocaust happened 60 + years ago, we shouldn't revisit it??

Same thing with pearl Harbour, and the entire Cold War, and the Cuban Missle Crisis, the invasion of Japan, etc. etc. etc. Do you think that just because its in the past, we just shouldn't explore it more and more?? Especially now that we have the technology that we have, we can explore those events even more than we could even 10 years ago.

Historically 9/11 will always be revisited. This special wasn't doing that. This special focused on the very conspiracy theories that most debunkers claim are disrespectful to 9/11 victims and families. Will there be another one next year?
 
Wow. The tearing apart of his religion on cable tv really got somebody's panties in a bunch.
 
So what year will they stop? Why wasn't it last year or the year before? Are debunkers reaching anyone? They weren't just doing a historical special on the event of 9/11. This was specifically about 9/11 conspiracy.

I saw a doc that addressed the JFK conspiracies a few years ago. Does THAT give you an idea?

What year will the CT's stop producing conspiracy vids about 911?
 

Back
Top Bottom