Merged National Geographic Special - "9/11 Science and Conspiracy" Debunks Thermite Myth

ImANiceGuy said:
A NY Post analysis of the doc....

http://www.nypost.com/seven/08282009/tv/the_story_behind_9_11__hit_or_myth__186793.htm

The producer concedes he would've loved it if the Truther theories were proven correct.

"Our ratings would've gone through the roof!" [Erik Nelson, executive producer] says.

"What do you think is more ratings grabbing: proof 9/11 was a conspiracy or proof that the official story was correct?" he asks. "It would've been fantastic to prove that the Truthers were correct, but sadly -- as far as my ratings are concerned -- that's not what happened.

So National Geographic should noose Nelson for his Nielson.
Click to expand...
I think someone from the media division of the NWO should contact that guy and tell him who signs his paychecks. ;)
 
DavidJames said:
I think someone from the media division of the NWO should contact that guy and tell him who signs his paychecks. ;)
Click to expand...
Paychecks at the NY Post? Well I guess they get paychecks at the National Enquirer too but they are little ones.
 
Isn't the fact it's on National Jew-ographic the most obvious debunking for the valiant truthseekers?
 
If you guys could post the link to a streaming site or torrent, that'd be great. I don't have the NGC, so I didn't catch it.
 
I tried to burn it to a DVD from my DVR, and it wouldn't let me do it. Something about some copyright infringement. So, I gotta figure out another way.
 
9/11 Nat Geo show. Is that all that is left of them?

While I was watching that rather pointless show. I was wondering if the 4 guys they had on the show were the last of the Twoof Movement?

One guy was on just long enough to say but they didn't test super thermite. I had a strong feeling that if they had invented super thermite just for him he then would of said but you didn't test super duper thermite. And so on.

The kid looked like he really didn't even want to be there. He didn't have much to say and what he did say sounded like he was reading it off cue cards.

The other 2 guys just disagreed with whatever they were shown without saying why they disagreed. One was asked what other theory's? His response was this isn't the place to discuss that.
If that show wasn't the right place to discuss that then what is the right place?

In my opinion (worthless as it is) I do not believe that any TV or cable station should dignify this nonsense with any acknowledgment of it at all.

All of the survey numbers quoted were like 3 years old along with all the video footage of twoofers. That tells me that there simply is not enough concern from the masses to add insult to injury by giving this crap air time.

But at least they left the victims and their loved ones out of it.
 
A number of posts have been sent to AAH for bickering and off-topic. The utility of this practice has been thoroughly debunked, so please discontinue its usage.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Tricky

Also, this thread merged with another very similar thread in order to conserve potential energy.
Posted By: Tricky
 
Last edited:
suggest merge with other national geographic 9/11 show threads.

TAM:)
 
They don't feel that's the appropriate place to talk about it for no other reason than the fact that they simply cannot put together anything remotely resembling a coherent storyline for how 9-11 was actually an inside job.

Rather than admit that, they convince themselves that it's not actually necessary for any of their ideas or theories to amount to anything. Simply poking "holes" in the "official story" is all they "need" to do. That alone it enough to show that the "official story" is wrong, in their minds. And if it's wrong, then we need a "new investigation".

But that's all the lip service they are paying. Of course, they feel that it really was all an inside job, and they do think they know how it was pulled off, but they don't bother to explain how, because they know it will be ridiculed as non-sensical. Easier to just convince yourself that you have it all figured out and everyone else is wrong. Or they simply can't handle the "reality". But they think they know how it happened, of that I am certain.
 
Last edited:
Whiplash said:
They don't feel that's the appropriate place to talk about it for no other reason than the fact that they simply cannot put together anything remotely resembling a coherent storyline for how 9-11 was actually an inside job.

Rather than admit that, they convince themselves that it's not actually necessary for any of their ideas or theories to amount to anything. Simply poking "holes" in the "official story" is all they "need" to do. That alone it enough to show that the "official story" is wrong, in their minds. And if it's wrong, then we need a "new investigation".

But that's all the lip service they are paying. Of course, they feel that it really was all an inside job, and they do think they know how it was pulled off, but they don't bother to explain how, because they know it will be ridiculed as non-sensical. Easier to just convince yourself that you have it all figured out and everyone else is wrong. Or they simply can't handle the "reality". But they think they know how it happened, of that I am certain.
Click to expand...

That makes perfect sense.
Thanks!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom