• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The PG Film - Bob Heironimus and Patty

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's been well established by Munns, among others, that the shape of Patty's head, even in profile, varies from frame to frame. If you want to dismiss this plain fact with a "loopy" emoticon, be my guest, but you're only revealing your own limited capacity for rational thought and reasoned argumentation.
 
SweatyYeti said:
Actually....the images of 'Bob-in-a-suit' say something about 'Bob-in-a-suit'.......not necessarily about Bob himself.

There is a difference.
Click to expand...

By all means, explain that difference and its relevance to the question of your bogus claim that Patty's arms were inhumanly long and could not be Bob's arms in a suit...





 
Earlier today.....I built, and videotaped...in motion, a device to test Fric and Frac's 'magical matching abilities'.

It re-creates, with a physical object, what Neltana created with his computer-generated skeletons.


Results......as soon as I can edit the videos, and post them. :D
 
SweatyYeti said:
Earlier today.....I built, and videotaped...in motion, a device to test Fric and Frac's 'magical matching abilities'.

It re-creates, with a physical object, what Neltana created with his computer-generated skeletons.


Results......as soon as I can edit the videos, and post them. :D
Click to expand...

Is that before or after you finish the bigfoot suit you're making?
 
SweatyYeti said:
My reasoning is based on a basic principle....not on a question of an individual's honesty, or trustworthiness.
Click to expand...

Oh, OK, good. Because wow, let me tell you, wouldn't it be ridiculous if a person who has a problem with lying, was talking about honesty or trustworthiness?

The principle is this...(snip)
Click to expand...

Hi there, how are you? I'm not the Bigfoot fanatic guy who is content to spend years scribbling chickenscratch with crayons on Patty in Massachusetts. I'm the guy who is going to invest my own money and personal time to get my butt over to Yakima and get some answers. I'm the guy that's going to talk to the man, measure the man, record the man, and find out if the man is making up lies or what. I don't think he is, but I'm going to do my best job to find out one way or another. The reason I'm considering bringing a prominent Bigfoot proponent is so that Bigfoot enthusiasts feel like they are being fairly represented.

If this thing can happen, it's going to incinerate the endless blather that's been going on since Greg Long's book came out. At least whatever blather that happens after will be new blather. It won't be blather about BH's arms or head or whatever.

If you were truly interested in whether or not Bob is being honest....you would be interested.


Busted. :)
Click to expand...

You're not sharing so what the heck do I care? I'm not doing anymore about your gobbledy-gook than I already have. I offered to have you PM it to me. If it isn't gobbledy-gook and is actually I good question, I'd bust it on him like all the rest of the interview questions - without any prior knowledge on his part. Whatever person I arrange to come with me will have all their own questions. You would be the last person fit for that job. If you communicate in person anything like you do here, I wouldn't want you in any circumstance that requires civility and tact.

So whatever bit of brilliance you think you have, looks like it's going to stay right up in your head. Just please don't try and fish with me, I'm not biting.
 
No-Goal.jpg
 
Last edited:
kitakaze wrote:
I'm not doing anymore about your gobbledy-gook
Click to expand...


The first results of the real, physical object re-creation of Neltana's skeleton video are in....:D....with jolly good news. :D

It looks like Fric and Frac are about to be relegated to the 'gobbledy-gook' bin. :D :)
 
SweatyYeti said:
I've never changed my argument, regarding Bob's head.

I think that it's too large....too 'squar-ish'....not pointy enough....not sloped enough....etc...:)


The problem here is that you do not understand the concept that something can be explained in more than ONE way....using different words.
Click to expand...

Nah...you just change the argument. I have repeatedly asked for measurement values and you do not provide them. WHen I provide values, you ignore them even though they demonstrate the head sizes are basically the same (within measurement/resolution error). This is when you come up with the head is too pointy or Bob's head is too square or something like that.


SweatyYeti said:
Apparently, you're also having trouble understanding the difference between 'plant' and 'animal'...
Click to expand...

Hey, if you want to admit that "Bunny" has a floppy headpiece on top of it's head then by all means admit that the top of the head is some form of ill-fitting piece of material. I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt that this was a creature that did not have a right angle dent in the side of its head. All you are doing with that demonstration is proving that it is probably a suit. I will concede that point readily.
 
SweatyYeti said:
The first results of the real, physical object re-creation of Neltana's skeleton video are in....:D....with jolly good news. :D
Click to expand...

Did I miss a link here? I want to see this real, physical object! Those are my favorite kind of physical object...real ones.

kitakaze said:
I'm not the Bigfoot fanatic guy who is content to spend years scribbling chickenscratch with crayons on Patty in Massachusetts.
Click to expand...

Is Sweaty in Massachusetts? Hey, I'm in Massachusetts too....Maybe I could go and actually see this real, physical object!
 
neltana said:
Did I miss a link here? I want to see this real, physical object! Those are my favorite kind of physical object...real ones.



Is Sweaty in Massachusetts? Hey, I'm in Massachusetts too....Maybe I could go and actually see this real, physical object!
Click to expand...



What part of the State do you live in, Neltana??
 
SweatyYeti said:
What part of the State do you live in, Neltana??
Click to expand...

The western, uninhabited portion....We have bear, moose, coyote...no Bigfoot though. He seems to live east of here, according to BFRO sighting reports.

I find it curious that the reported Bigfoot sightings are all out east. I suppose that is where all the people are...a necessary condition of a Bigfoot sighting. I just wouldn't think that would be where the Bigfeetuses are (perhaps not a necessary component of a Bigfoot sighting).

I haven't visited the famed Bridgewater Triangle , but the population density of that section of the state is about 10 times what it is here (see Avatar on map).

Strangely, the big guy prefers to stay out east. I wonder if it is because Loren Coleman used to live there. After all, what would a crypto-creature be without a good press agent? (Ask the Dover Demon, Loren lived one town over from there!)


Unmodified BFRO Map


Oh...need to drag this back to the content of this thread....um...wait, there really isn't any content anymore, is there?
 
neltana said:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=17434http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/234114a9c3261ea009.gif
Unmodified BFRO Map


Oh...need to drag this back to the content of this thread....um...wait, there really isn't any content anymore, is there?
Click to expand...

On that note. I had never seen the above linked website. In other threads on BF I had noted the disdain for locales that were small and not very isolated (Salt Flats, etc) and thought I have a huge wilderness right next to me but I doubt bigfoot would live there..too freeking hot - (it's 105 right now) also Southern California is not perceived as wilderness by a lot of people. Behold though I do have bigfoot in my back yard. According to the website 3 sightings!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Padres_National_Forest

I'm so lucky!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom