• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Split Thread WTC7 is a problem for the 9/11 official story

Never before in the history of CD had thermite/mate/nano been used in a cd a building

bill smith said:
The way a fool sees it is this:-

WTC1 and WTC2 had explosives/incendiaries buit in. So did WTC7. As far as we can tell none of he other WTC buildings did. WTC 1 and WTC2 were struck by airliners and subsequently collapsed while WTC7 had some unlikely looking fires ad also colapsed several hours later.
Click to expand...
So they had incendiary's built in decades before even a laboratory sample of this alleged incendiary even existed?
The only defference between the Twin Towers and WTC7 was therefore the absence of an airliner.

Then I thought 'perhaps an airliner was meant to hit WTC7 too ''- but for some reason it did not arrive so the perps lit some fires on various floors of the building in the hope that they would connect up and cause a big enough fire to allow the bilding to be demoished under cover of the blaze. Unfortunately the fire did not eally catch and they had to go ahead and demolish the building anyway at 5:20 in the afternoon.
Click to expand...
I do not recall Barry Jennings and Michael Hess reporting demolition teams wandering around the building as they were trying to escape. Can you direct me to this testimony girl child?
Boston Logan Airport: Flight 93 got stuck on the runway and could not take off for an gour aafter it's scheduled departure time. Obvously t was now too late to try to crash it into WTC7 so they flew it out over rural Pennsylvania while they decided what to do with it.
Click to expand...
They wouldn't crash anything into building seven because other buildings were in the way BS. Also it was not a landmark or a building of any importance. It was just an insignificant little known piece of real estate
You see how neat this is ? Three airliners, three buildings and no mess in Pennsylvania.
Click to expand...
define your version of neat. Because no one here is seeing it. What you have is a handful of your fantasy with so many loose ends its self debunking. It reads like a third rate nineteen seventies TV action drama.
 
A W Smith said:
You are aware of course the Bazant's was not a hypothesis but a mathematical best case scenario to test the potential for collapse arrest? And was not what actually occurred that day?
Click to expand...

Shhhhhhhhh. Bill might hear.
 
A W Smith said:
So they had incendiary's built in decades before even a laboratory sample of this alleged incendiary even existed? I do not recall Barry Jennings and Michael Hess reporting demolition teams wandering around the building as they were trying to escape. Can you direct me to this testimony girl child? They wouldn't crash anything into building seven because other buildings were in the way BS. Also it was not a landmark or a building of any importance. It was just an insignificant little known piece of real estate
define your version of neat. Because no one here is seeing it. What you have is a handful of your fantasy with so many loose ends its self debunking. It reads like a third rate nineteen seventies TV action drama.
Click to expand...

Considering the Hollywood extravaganza style of the TV imagery on 9/11 I have a feeling that they had planned to nose-dive flight 93 into the roof of WTC7.
Think how impressive that would have looked ? Especially with another giant fireball.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Considering the Hollywood extravaganza style of the TV imagery on 9/11 I have a feeling the that they had planned to nose-dive flight 93 into the roof of WTC7.
Think how impressive that would have looked ? Especially with another giant fireball.
Click to expand...

But bill, feelings are not evidence.

And wasn't Flight 93 heading for Washington?
 
A W Smith said:
Also it [WTC7] was not a landmark or a building of any importance. It was just an insignificant little known piece of real estate
Click to expand...


Aha! That's what they want you to think. Your inability to see bill smith's evidence as proof of a conspiracy is more proof that "they" did a good job of making it look like it wasn't a conspiracy. Duh.
 
Remember 'operation shock and awe' ? When i first heard that name I thought it sounded very weird.

After watching the extravaganza on 9/11 it's easy to see who was supposed to be ' shocked and awed '. I'm amazed that you are not all furious at being so cynically manipulated.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Effectively what you say is the absolute Truth Twinstead. No rational person could say that WTC7 did not look enough like controlled demolition as to require a new 9/11 investigation.

And we all know that if there is a problem with WTC7 there is a problem with the whole 9/11 official story.
Click to expand...

Here's an education for you, Bill. Listen carefully:

http://skeptoid.com/audio/skeptoid-4085.mp3
 
Oh boy... I see billy boy is again ignoring the facts.

How does it NOT look like CD?
1. where are the series of rapid fire concussive blasts right before wtc7 collapses? There is LIVE video which have people being interviewed just blocks away from wtc7... yet no explosions.
2. How does a CD hit the ROOF of an adjacent building?
3. How does a CD hit the building RIGHT next to it over 40 feet away causing massive damage?
4. WHere is the miles of DET cord, blasting caps or anything else?

So other than the building fell down, it LOOKS NOTHING like a CD. EVEN the CD EXPERTS say it looks nothing like CD.

Try again billy boy.
 
Last edited:
TruthersLie said:
Oh boy... I see billy boy is again ignoring the facts.

How does it NOT look like CD?
1. where are the series of rapid fire concussive blasts right before wtc7 collapses? There is LIVE video which have people being interviewed just blocks away from wtc7... yet no explosions.
2. How does a CD hit the ROOF of an adjacent building?
3. How does a CD hit the building RIGHT next to it over 40 feet away causing massive damage?
4. WHere is the miles of DET cord, blasting caps or anything else?

So other than the building fell down, it LOOKS NOTHING like a CD. EVEN the CD EXPERTS say it looks nothing like CD.



Try again billy boy.
Click to expand...

No....that was one of your guys agreeing that WTC7 looked like a controlled demolition. Read it again.
 
bill smith said:
Remember 'operation shock and awe' ? When i first heard that name I thought it sounded very weird.

After watching the extravaganza on 9/11 it's easy to see who was supposed to be ' shocked and awed '. I'm amazed that you are not all furious at being so cynically manipulated.
Click to expand...

operation shock and awe?
shock and awe is a tactic so to say
not the name of an operation

and yes 19 terrorists and their leaders followed the example quite well that day

bill what did you think of "operation blitzkrieg" in WWII?
 
well i do think WTC7 looks pretty much like a CD, and a few experts also see it that way.

but does that mean it is a CD?

When it looks like a CD
when it sound like a CD.... damn doesnt work :D
 
bill smith said:
No....that was one of your guys agreeing that WTC7 looked like a controlled demolition. Read it again.
Click to expand...

Yes, because it fell DOWN.

That, after seven years of research, is what the truthers' WTC7 argument boils down to every single time: "OMG, it fell DOWN!!!"
 
bill smith said:
Considering the Hollywood extravaganza style of the TV imagery on 9/11 I have a feeling that they had planned to nose-dive flight 93 into the roof of WTC7.
Think how impressive that would have looked ? Especially with another giant fireball.
Click to expand...
Hmmmm...
bill smith said:
It could have been shot down or maybe it landed safely at Cleveland. The story of 93 is much more interesting than is commonly known Isuspect.
Click to expand...
Contradict yourself much Bill?
 
One bright day, in the middle of the night,
Trustworthy traitors with explosive thermite
Put bombs in the basement for top-down collapse,
Then told thousands of Jews, "keep this plan under wraps."
They publicly flaunted their secretive ways
With a twelve-hour power-down that lasted two days.
Then innocent terrorists hijacked planes (four times),
Showing us how the U.S. is guilty of war crimes.
Then bomb-laden holograms flew in their place
(By the FBI, to throw themselves off the case)
Toward four helpless targets that planes couldn't harm.
NORAD defenders stood down in alarm
Then shot down one plane and to Cleveland flew it
To fool all the networks, who already knew it.
The fire chief said "pull it" and pushed towers down
Into their own footprints, for blocks all around.
These pre-taped events were all shown on TV live
(Just like when O'Brien told Winston to see five!)
As part of an idiot's ingenious plan
To fight the Iraqis in Afghanistan.
But because I know nothing, they couldn't deceive me.
I only tell lies to prove you should believe me.

Contradictions? What contradictions?

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom