• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

I was on talk radio today!

Lurker

Illuminator
Joined
May 15, 2002
Messages
4,189
So I was cruising in to work this morning and I heard Mike Gallager talking about Obama vacationing at Matha's Vineyard. He was going on and on about how much it cost and the luxuries there. I decided to call in.

Surprisingly, after a short hold I was put on with the host at 7:45AM today. I told Mike that Republicans always decry liberals and democrats for engaging in class warfare yet he was doing in right now. Mike started in about the cost and I interrupted saying that Obama earns a good living as President and has earned much money in his book income and (he and his wife) as lawyers. Mike went on a slightly different tack and implied that in our current economic times he is a public servant and needs to lead by example and not vacation in such a high manner. I countered that he earned his money and he can spend it how he will and questioned if Mike is going to tell him or any other rich person how to spend their money.

I don't recall what Mike said after that but he said something else and hung up on me just as I was trying to say more. I wonder what got on the air?

Anyone hear this?
 
Congrats on being a (brief) voice of sanity Lurker.

This new tack of "Obama shouldn't be taking vacation" is among the very lamest of the attempts to smear the president. Not only did the previous president take almost three years of vacation, it has been demonstrated that people need to take vacation in order to keep functioning at their optimum. Many companies, including my own, take measures to ensure that their employees take their vacation.

Besides, this is hardly a "critical time" where something must be done immediately. Heck, Congress is not even in session.

Talk show hosts must be desperate for things to slam Obama about.
 
Here is a transcript of that exchange:

Gallagher: So what do you think? Let's go to the phones. [Name omitted], from [location omitted], how do you feel about the waste of taxpayers' money by Obama?

Caller: Hi, Mike, thanks for taking my call ....

Gallagher: No problem, that's what I do ....

Caller: ... and I just want to say that I know you and the Republicans are always after, uh, Democrats and liberals for engaging in class warfare ....

Gallagher: Uh, huh.

Caller: ... and yet that is what you are doing right n....

Announcer: See Bob. Bob has confidence. Confidence that comes with natural male enhancement.

(Just kiddin'. This is not a real transcript. Talk show hosts, of any stripe, don't like being called hypocrites, even when their hypocrisy is manifest. All I can say is that it would not surprise me if there was a seven- or fifteen- or thirty-second delay that would allow foul language to be cut, and would also allow the host to abort the call early if it didn't look like it was going to be a butt-smooch or make a favorable point.)
 
...

Talk show hosts must be desperate for things to slam Obama about.

You're not kidding. Our local talkshow (Peter Boyles, which these days just seems to be an opening act for Glen Beck) has been on the birther thing for weeks now. Last week, he was proving his point of media conspiracy by pointing out (every day) that Doonesbury was making fun of the birth issue. "There's a reason they're doing that!" he was insisting.

Yeah, because it's funny?
 
Last edited:
Congrats on being a (brief) voice of sanity Lurker.

This new tack of "Obama shouldn't be taking vacation" is among the very lamest of the attempts to smear the president. Not only did the previous president take almost three years of vacation, it has been demonstrated that people need to take vacation in order to keep functioning at their optimum. Many companies, including my own, take measures to ensure that their employees take their vacation.

Besides, this is hardly a "critical time" where something must be done immediately. Heck, Congress is not even in session.

Talk show hosts must be desperate for things to slam Obama about.
I wish the folks who say these things wouldn't be branded by the liberal media as "conservatives." They are not "conservatives," they are (1) stupid, (2) full of s***, (3) effin' nuts or (4) a combination thereof. These three criteria come from the late George Carlin. Real conservatives ought to strive not to qualify under any of the three Carlin criteria.

Real conservatives do not make up facts, nor do they try to pass off opinion as fact. On the contrary, real conservatives base their opinions on the facts ... and they are always willing to learn new facts and to learn whether a fact previously believed was in error.

Real conservatives consider hypocrisy and double-standards to be evils, and strenuously avoid them.

Real conservatives do not oppose all changes to the status quo; rather, they tend to oppose changes unless they are supported by a proper showing of need and a probability that the proposed change will make things better.

Real conservatives place principle over loyalty. If an ally makes an error, a real conservative will not perpetuate the error in the name of loyalty to the person in the wrong.

Real conservatives do not believe that government is evil; rather, they believe that government has its place. Consequently, every proposed law must be supported by a justification that it is government's place to institute such a law.

Real conservatives favor liberty for everyone, not just for themselves.

Real conservatives recognize that with legally enforceable rights come legally enforceable responsibilities. This means that responsibilities attach to all rights, including Second Amendment rights.

Real conservatives support financial responsibility, not just of government, but of their own houses and companies.

Real conservatives support accountability, including criminal accountability, for wrongdoers. No favoritism should be given merely because the wrongdoer is a white collar criminal rather than a blue collar crook, and no one should get a break merely because of who his friends are.

Real conservatives do not idolize any anyone. They recognize that even the greatest leaders were imperfect, and that a principle is not necessarily just merely because a great leader uttered it.

Real conservatives support long-standing (some would say traditional) notions that financial success is best derived by honest, hard work; that one’s reputation for integrity must be maintained; that trustworthiness is a virtue; and that courtesy is for everyone.

Real conservatives do not belittle the poor merely for being poor. They are reluctant to help those who are freeloaders, but they have sympathy and charity for those who become poor through circumstance.

Real conservatives feel that personal responsibility is of exceptional importance in all aspects of life, including sexuality. One must recognize that acts have consequences.

Real conservatives do not seek government favoritism of their religion… or of any religion. Taking a stand on religious issues is not government’s job.

Real conservatives understand that military action has a place, but military action is not a viable solution for many problems.

Real conservatives are tough on crime but they do not wish to let the desire for toughness exceed the need for justice.

Real conservatives do not obstruct progress for the sake of obstructing, nor do they obstruct for petty purposes.

Real conservatives understand basic economics, including the notion that the free market in some circumstances will not be self-regulating, and that one legitimate purpose of government is to supply benefits that the free market cannot provide.

So many of the so-called "conservative" leaders and celebrities today do not apply these principles. Instead, they say stupid things, they put forth ideas that are completely full of fertilizer, and they propound insane nonsense. These folks are not "conservatives."
 
Yeah, I was just about to get into how complaining about Obama's vacation seemed quite petty and was going to compare him to Hannity criticizing Obama's choice of hamburger condiment.

http://www.theweek.com/article/index/96308/Sean_Hannity_Obama_and_Dijongate

Unfortunately, I was cut off mid sentence and could not make the comparison.
People used to kvetch about Reagan at his California ranch when he'd take a few days off. People used to kvetch about Nixon going off to San Clemente now and again. People are gonna kvetch about Obama taking a few days off.

Jimmy Carter nearly closed Camp David, since he had this idea about how presidents ought to be workaholics. They may be, but it's a darned good thing he didn't. He'd have had no place to win a nobel prize had he done so. ;P

Of all the things to snark about, this one is pretty low on the list of importance, just above "does the president actually floss after each meal" and "does the president's dog lick its balls when company comes over to the White House?"

DR
 
Last edited:
I wish the folks who say these things wouldn't be branded by the liberal media as "conservatives." They are not "conservatives," they are (1) stupid, (2) full of s***, (3) effin' nuts or (4) a combination thereof. These three criteria come from the late George Carlin. Real conservatives ought to strive not to qualify under any of the three Carlin criteria.

...
"

I agree with you, but:
Stand by for references to "No True Scotsman" by long-haired, knee-jerk liberal commie pinko wierdo freaks...
:D:D:D
 
I wish the folks who say these things wouldn't be branded by the liberal media as "conservatives." They are not "conservatives," they are (1) stupid, (2) full of s***, (3) effin' nuts or (4) a combination thereof. These three criteria come from the late George Carlin. Real conservatives ought to strive not to qualify under any of the three Carlin criteria.

Real conservatives do not make up facts, nor do they try to pass off opinion as fact. On the contrary, real conservatives base their opinions on the facts ... and they are always willing to learn new facts and to learn whether a fact previously believed was in error.
<snip>
Damn! Real Conservatives are Moderates! Who knew!:D
 
Congrats on being a (brief) voice of sanity Lurker.

This new tack of "Obama shouldn't be taking vacation" is among the very lamest of the attempts to smear the president. Not only did the previous president take almost three years of vacation, it has been demonstrated that people need to take vacation in order to keep functioning at their optimum. Many companies, including my own, take measures to ensure that their employees take their vacation.

Besides, this is hardly a "critical time" where something must be done immediately. Heck, Congress is not even in session.

Talk show hosts must be desperate for things to slam Obama about.

Down here we call it "player hating".
 
He's right! No True Conservative would eat his porridge with sugar!
 
Mike went on a slightly different tack and implied that in our current economic times he is a public servant and needs to lead by example and not vacation in such a high manner. I countered that he earned his money and he can spend it how he will and questioned if Mike is going to tell him or any other rich person how to spend their money.

... Mike sounds like a socialist, (you might have added), wanting rich citizens to spend below their means and all ;)

Rich people stimulating the economy is a good thing.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom