demolition proven outright by basic physics
OK, time to prove and I mean PROVE 911 was demolition and an inside job.
Fire weakening steel: Kerosine fires in real world conditions or dirty burns such as 911 produce temperatures not exceeding 700F, no way near enough to weaken structural steel designed to resist 5 times their weight, especially when combined with the fact that steel has a high thermal conductivity and would draw heat away rapidly. Also the fact that the aluminium cladding was not even deformed proves the fires were not hot enough.
Speed of collapse: The collapses themselves violate the law of conservation of momentum. There is no way that all the solid structural steel columns and supports, especially all the ones below the impacts unaffected by fire would offer no resistance to produce near freefall speed without demolition. The official pancaking story has been abandoned as it obviously attempts to treat the collapse as a floor by floor scenario when the load bearing distribution obviously involves the entire frame. The steel structures are built to withstand 5 times the load above them, the minimal kinetic energy acquired by a floor failing(of which there is no logical reason anyway) would not come close to approaching the load bearing limit. Any impact tremors from collapse are distributed throughout the frame and would be inconsequential.
The negation of the toppling effect: Localised damage caused by a plane impact would lead to a structural inequality, thus the top section would topple like a tree falling toward the cut, this is observed to begin happening in the south tower collapse. However, as it is the gravitational force or downward pressure from the toppling upper section enabling it to topple, it’s uneven base acting as a pivot / fulcrum against the lower section, then the more the top section forces against the lower section, the more the toppling would continue and it would fall off to the side. But the top of the lower section explodes away downward, the pivot/fulcrum pressure is released and the top section ceases toppling and falls straight down proving that gravitational pressure of the top mass did not cause the collapse.
Symmetric collapse: symmetric, even collapse is IMPOSSIBLE without demolition as all structural supports must be removed simultaneously across each floor, this is impossible in a natural collapse as even a slight integrity inequality ALWAYS leads to a messy uneven and in most cases partial collapse.
These facts are IRREFUTABLE! Why is there a debate??!!!
Oh I know why, there are a lot of government-paid bloggers here with the fallacious official story facts sheet in front of them.
Now lets' see if any of you can refute the proof without resorting to hurling abuse, calling me a conspiracy theorist thinking that constitutes an argument, or illogically appealing to the memories of the dead.
