finalmessenger
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Messages
- 80
Holy bully
Cookie cutter collision vids and stills prove it's not a plane but a figment of some rich peoples' sick twisted power-mad fantasy to hold sway over the lives of those not in the know.
Sheared the bolts is the theory of dolts. Got some and given it back.
The plane does not twist but it goes in sideways. It does not bend, though it is mostly aluminum. It does not crack though it is impacting what is essentially a solid steel wall. The engines? Sure. Possible. The rest of the wings? Forgive me for scoffing at your scoffing. The tail? Cardboard would stand up as well.
You don't need to be a structural engineer to understand basic physics from high school or just reading science journals on your own in your spare time. This is like a 150 lb (what I weigh) football player smacking into the 300 lb (forget the metric system here) Mr. William "Refrigerator" Perry full tilt. You will wink-wink, nudge-nudge him and that's about it. I have no delusions as to how that match up would come out. it's not like martial arts where you're going for stuns to pressure points. I would bounce off of "The Fridge" like nobody's bidness, you bet. Played a little f-ball against bigger fellas so I think I would know that. Hit 'em just right and they might topple, but that's pain talking.
Buildings don't feel pain. There are no pressure points. Once a rivet is in place with its buddies in the other joints you might as well say it's part of the whole. You're trying (and not successfully at all) to imply that the bolts/welds/rivets all sheared at the same time so we get this effect of a cookie cutter collision (came out the other side and disintegrated in some vids) that is really just an optical illusion. Is that what you're saying? Really?
Rudy Giuliani said the buildings imploded and he was surprised as anyone. I'll bet. He said it again on a talk show. Excuse me?
Just where are you going with this?
Why do no plane videos even exist with ongoing commentators who don't even mention planes.
Take a video with a plane in it...a real plane. You must delete the plane from each and every frame or make a vid from exactly the same angle and cut in the building exploding in the frames where "impact" occurs from the exact same angle as the official story cameras with the same clouds in the background. No one with any amount of a clue would do such a thing against there own country. No one would do it period. Maybe you haven't seen and heard them. I have. They...not one but several...were the straws that blew that camel's back apart at the seams for me.
Sheared nothing. Sick rich people telling us one thing and doing another. The reason that so many didn't say anything is that they feared for their cushy positions. Cowards.
Too easy! And I believed the official story, too, until I had the facts.
Get a grip on reality or stop lying to yourself or stop lying to everyone else here.
I'd love to engage in a meaningful discussion with the "truther". This site is beginning to sicken me...like months ago.
Cookie cutter collision vids and stills prove it's not a plane but a figment of some rich peoples' sick twisted power-mad fantasy to hold sway over the lives of those not in the know.
Sheared the bolts is the theory of dolts. Got some and given it back.
The plane does not twist but it goes in sideways. It does not bend, though it is mostly aluminum. It does not crack though it is impacting what is essentially a solid steel wall. The engines? Sure. Possible. The rest of the wings? Forgive me for scoffing at your scoffing. The tail? Cardboard would stand up as well.
You don't need to be a structural engineer to understand basic physics from high school or just reading science journals on your own in your spare time. This is like a 150 lb (what I weigh) football player smacking into the 300 lb (forget the metric system here) Mr. William "Refrigerator" Perry full tilt. You will wink-wink, nudge-nudge him and that's about it. I have no delusions as to how that match up would come out. it's not like martial arts where you're going for stuns to pressure points. I would bounce off of "The Fridge" like nobody's bidness, you bet. Played a little f-ball against bigger fellas so I think I would know that. Hit 'em just right and they might topple, but that's pain talking.
Buildings don't feel pain. There are no pressure points. Once a rivet is in place with its buddies in the other joints you might as well say it's part of the whole. You're trying (and not successfully at all) to imply that the bolts/welds/rivets all sheared at the same time so we get this effect of a cookie cutter collision (came out the other side and disintegrated in some vids) that is really just an optical illusion. Is that what you're saying? Really?
Rudy Giuliani said the buildings imploded and he was surprised as anyone. I'll bet. He said it again on a talk show. Excuse me?
Just where are you going with this?
Why do no plane videos even exist with ongoing commentators who don't even mention planes.
Take a video with a plane in it...a real plane. You must delete the plane from each and every frame or make a vid from exactly the same angle and cut in the building exploding in the frames where "impact" occurs from the exact same angle as the official story cameras with the same clouds in the background. No one with any amount of a clue would do such a thing against there own country. No one would do it period. Maybe you haven't seen and heard them. I have. They...not one but several...were the straws that blew that camel's back apart at the seams for me.
Sheared nothing. Sick rich people telling us one thing and doing another. The reason that so many didn't say anything is that they feared for their cushy positions. Cowards.
Too easy! And I believed the official story, too, until I had the facts.
Get a grip on reality or stop lying to yourself or stop lying to everyone else here.
I'd love to engage in a meaningful discussion with the "truther". This site is beginning to sicken me...like months ago.
