Moderated Continuation - Why a one-way Crush down is not possible

bill smith said:
Kevin Barrett described a visit to a University in Madison I think t was where 1,000 invitatons were issued for a 9/11 debate with Barrett and Kevin Ryan. Everybody got one incuding all the engineering departments but nobody would appear to defend the governent fairy tale. So Ryan had to play the government side while Barrett layed the Truth side. What a loke. Apparently this happens everywhere.It's fascinating actually.
Click to expand...
Apparently this happens everywhere.It's fascinating actually
Click to expand...
.
"Apparently!!!"... LOL.
Apparently you're a looney.

Bill, if what you are saying is true, what are you going to do about it hu? Why dont you take the government to court. Why are you not publically pursuing some kind of judicial enquiry. Why are you not chaining yourself to a lampost outside the whitehouse to demonstrate about it. If I really believed my government was responsible for such an enormous crime I'd be doing exactly that - and there would be thousands of others. But I guess you havent got the bollocks for that hu. Thats whats so crass about you. You come on this forum and act like a complete tit about something that would, if it had any credability to it at all, be a very serious, very worrying situation. Instead you knock about with stupid ideas that have no basis in reality with snide comments and stupid jokes. The reason you do this, the reason you treat the subject blithely with such careless remarks is because deep down you either dont really believe it (or "know" it to be true) or else you really dont give a toss. Either way you a poor excuse.

The reason why everyone else puts up with this thoughtlessness is that we all know its a pile of crap. We KNOW that you know that we know your comments are full of *****.
 
bill smith said:
I forgot to mention that Barrett and Ryan got some private messages from some of the faculty scientists saying that it would be more than their jobs and careers were worth to appear. Interesting isn't it ?
Click to expand...

bill smith said:
George Bushes's word is absolutely not enough.
Click to expand...

But Kevin Barrett and Kevin Ryan's word is fine.

Dave
 
BadBoy said:
.
"Apparently!!!"... LOL.
Apparently you're a looney.

Bill, if what you are saying is true, what are you going to do about it hu? Why dont you take the government to court. Why are you not publically pursuing some kind of judicial enquiry. Why are you not chaining yourself to a lampost outside the whitehouse to demonstrate about it. If I really believed my government was responsible for such an enormous crime I'd be doing exactly that - and there would be thousands of others. But I guess you havent got the bollocks for that hu. Thats whats so crass about you. You come on this forum and act like a complete tit about something that would, if it had any credability to it at all, be a very serious, very worrying situation. Instead you knock about with stupid ideas that have no basis in reality with snide comments and stupid jokes. The reason you do this, the reason you treat the subject blithely with such careless remarks is because deep down you either dont really believe it (or "know" it to be true) or else you really dont give a toss. Either way you a poor excuse.

The reason why everyone else puts up with this thoughtlessness is that we all know its a pile of crap. We KNOW that you know that we know your comments are full of *****.
Click to expand...

I'll write it down and you can accept it or reject it at your own discretion. Or put me on your ignore list. You are not short of options.
 
bill smith said:
I'll write it down and you can accept it or reject it at your own discretion. Or put me on your ignore list. You are not short of options.
Click to expand...
Sorry everyone. I know Im giving him far too much emotional bandwidth. Ill stick to listening to the science in future. its just sometimes.....
 
bill smith said:
The credibility of a commentator to me is measured by whether he is a Shill or not Dave. No more- no less. I am not one of those who is asking whether 9/11 was an inside job or not. I know that 9/11 was an inside job.
Click to expand...


You see, that's your downfall in a nutshell. You "know" something that is completely wrong. The Islamic terrorist attacks of 9/11 were not by any stretch of the imagination an inside job. All of your myths are dead and buried.

In recent weeks, you've put on a display of buffoonery for the ages. You've peddled Judy Wood's dustification madness, you've claimed that stuctural steel was missing, you echo all of Heiwa's off-the-wall nonsense, and to cap it off, you've been reduced to parroting the looniest of the loons, the no-planers. These spasms are the equivalent of raising the white flag, Bill. You lack the integrity and intelligence to admit that you've been wrong about everything, but your wild, desperate flailing provides more fun for the good guys than any honest admission of failure ever could. And, as we've always known that you're wrong about everything, your acknowledgment of that fact is hardly necessary.
 
bill smith said:
Kevin Barrett described a visit to a University in Madison I think t was where 1,000 invitatons were issued for a 9/11 debate with Barrett and Kevin Ryan. Everybody got one incuding all the engineering departments but nobody would appear to defend the governent fairy tale. So Ryan had to play the government side while Barrett layed the Truth side. What a loke. Apparently this happens everywhere.It's fascinating actually.
Click to expand...


Barrett is, as usual, lying. He is referring to the debate planned by Ed Haas. Several debunkers agreed to participate, and the frauds all found reasons to bow out. Kevin Ryan challenged Mark Roberts to a debate, and when Roberts instantly accepted, Waterboy ran for the hills. Let's see these two lying morons who eagerly play pretend-debate with each other face some real debunkers. Oh, right--it will never happen.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
[Sigh]....Dave, you don't have any evidence. George Bushes's word is absolutely not enough.
Click to expand...


You're cracking, Bill. Your horrible humiliations have severed your tenuous ties with reality. The sane side has ALL the evidence. Your insane movement has nothing.

What has George Bush said about specific 9/11-related issues? Nothing, you say? Oh, so you lied again. Bill, it's over. Your lynch mob will have to look for other innocent victims.
 
Last edited:
BadBoy said:
Sorry everyone. I know Im giving him far too much emotional bandwidth. Ill stick to listening to the science in future. its just sometimes.....
Click to expand...
Bad Boy why don't you continue questioning them closely on your reservations of yesterday about the collapse of WTC1 ?
 
bill smith said:
I forgot to mention that Barrett and Ryan got some private messages from some of the faculty scientists saying that it would be more than their jobs and careers were worth to appear. Interesting isn't it ?
Click to expand...

I say b******t.
 
Heiwa said:
Well, if you, like Bazant & Co, simplify structural damage analysis by first making all assemblies of elements involved 1-D and second assume (!) that one assembly of elements (part C) is rigid ... and the other (part A) not, then you'll end up with the wrong result.
It becomes surrealistic when part C then transforms part A into rubble (part B) as such a destruction process is not possible, when C and A has similar structures. You cannot assume that C is rigid and A not. To clarify this is one purpose of this thread.
Click to expand...

Sigh....no Heiwa you are wrong as has been pointed out several times.....

Just repeating "blah blah blah part C blah blah part A blah blah one way crush down blah blah cant happen blah blah" isn't enough.

Prove it.

Prove it using physics and mathematics. Otherwise just stop talking....no one cares about your opinion.
 
bill smith said:
I forgot to mention that Barrett and Ryan got some private messages from some of the faculty scientists saying that it would be more than their jobs and careers were worth to appear. Interesting isn't it ?
Click to expand...


Why bother to mention it? The liars are lying. That's all they do. No faculty scientists wrote to Waterboy and the deranged Jew-hater to express their fear of reprisals. I wonder how that would work. I supopose the faculty, 98% of its members virulently opposed to George Bush and his policies, wouldn't tolerate anyone speaking badly of Republicans.

Whenever you seem to hit rock-bottom, you find a way to dig down a bit deeper.
 
newton3376 said:
Sigh....no Heiwa you are wrong as has been pointed out several times.....

Just repeating "blah blah blah part C blah blah part A blah blah one way crush down blah blah cant happen blah blah" isn't enough.

Prove it.

Prove it using physics and mathematics. Otherwise just stop talking....no one cares about your opinion.
Click to expand...


Heiwa doesn't do physics or mathematics.
 
bill smith said:
It's funny when you see posts 1356 and 1357 together like that isn't it ? How alike they are. Almost as if one was taken from the other. I wonder if FineWine noticed before he posted ?
Click to expand...


Um, I will rise to the bait and point out the obvious, namely, that posts 1356 and 1357 are not even similar. Did you have two different posts in mind, or we seeing symptoms of an Ultima1/Homeland Insurgency-style breakdown?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom