Moderated Continuation - Why a one-way Crush down is not possible

[bill smith]

Like how you showed us that the core of the WTC was completely intact, including the beams, when it was only a doctored video?

Or when shown pictures of the remaining core after the collapse you automatically assumed it "dustified" when it was no longer in frame?

Or your knowledge of Euler Buckling? Wow, we were really amazed when you showed us up on that particular topic.

We're so embarrassed about having shown you to be wrong in every single topic.

I agreed that the video may have been doctored.

I don't think I made any claim about 'dustifiction '. You were the one to use that word I believe.

You were the one to bring up euler buckling

Three out of three. Now who is wrong on every single topic ?

PS. Here's that video again so people can see what we were talking about as regards the apparently crumbling core columns.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=NL&hl=nl&v=-dWBBEtA5bI

 

[Newtons Bit]

I agreed that the video may have been doctored.

I don't think I made any claim about 'dustifiction '. You were the one to use that word I believe.

You were the one to bring up euler buckling

Three out of three. Now who is wrong on every single topic ?

PS. Here's that video again so people can see what we were talking about as regards the apparently crumbling core columns.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=NL&hl=nl&v=-dWBBEtA5bI

Welcome to ignore, troll. Seriously, STOP WASTING PEOPLES TIME. I made a serious effort to explain some basic concepts to you and this is how you behave.

Child.

 

[bill smith]

Welcome to ignore, troll. Seriously, STOP WASTING PEOPLES TIME. I made a serious effort to explain some basic concepts to you and this is how you behave.

Child.

That's a pity. I had hoped to walk you through the collapse sequence sometime soon and let you debunk my findings as we moved down the building. But if it is not to be ?....so be it. Have a nice life Newton and see you around.

 

[beachnut]

Someone knowledge free on this topic...

That's a pity. I had hoped to walk you through the collapse sequence sometimes soon and let you debunk my findings as we moved down the building. But if it is not to be ?....so be it. Have a nice life Newton and see you around.

It is a pity you can't understand 911 and choose to freely post lies, delusions, and false information all without any supporting evidence. Why are you unable to understand this topic and all of o 911?

Welcome to ignore, troll. Seriously, STOP WASTING PEOPLES TIME. I made a serious effort to explain some basic concepts to you and this is how you behave.

Child.

Something that was not a secret on her first post. At least Heiwa can fool those conspiracy minded evidence free people who have no knowledge on 911 or engineering.

 

[A W Smith]

do you enjoy having your ass handed to you BS?

I don't think I made any claim about 'dustifiction '. You were the one to use that word I believe.

memory loss bill? cant remember your lies?

Are you not at all interested in the fact that the image on the right seems to show the steel becoming dust ?

 

[bill smith]

Hey dolt

Oops. Forgot about that one. But nevertheless I was not making any big deal about it. Just an observervation which was plain to see as in the attached video. Sorry Newton.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=NL&hl=nl&v=-dWBBEtA5bI

 

[triforcharity]

I was going to post the exact same quote, but you beat me to it. Thanks buddy.

Oh, BTW, Bill, Are you embarassing us?? Kinda like how I proved you wrong in the missing steel thread?? WITH pictures, AND simple directions??? Kinda like that????

 

[A W Smith]

fixed that for ya

Opps. Forgot about that lie. But nevertheless I was not making any big deal about it. Just an observation that I cant even keep track of what the hell im even talking about which was plain to see in all my previous posts. Sorry you caught me in a lie Newton.

fixed the quote for ya B.S. to reflect what you are really trying to say in so many words

when are you gonna un-park that sock you used in your first weeks here bill? you could sure use a cheerleader to extract yourself from the rectal cavity you stuck your head into.

 

[bill smith]

fixed the quote for ya B.S. to reflect what you are really trying to say in so many words

when are you gonna un-park that sock you used in your first weeks here bill? you could sure use a cheerleader to extract yourself from the rectal cavity you stuck your head into.

I don't think that the jref with it's high standards should tolerate common forgery. But if you guys think it is okay... well,that tells a lot.

 

[FineWine]

OK, the pestle is part F and the mortar is part D. Say you drop the pestle F in the mortar D and ... nothing happens! No rubble, part E develops at all. Are you really suggesting that a pestle can one-way crush down a mortar?

The reason people here are so exasperated with your bizarre antics is that no sane person, much less someone with an engineering degree, could possibly believe the stuff you write. Are you seriously suggesting that you could watch thirteen floors collapse onto one floor and not expect that the crushed floor would be compacted? How can you hope to con anyone (apart from the hopeless Bill Smith) with such madness?

 

[A W Smith]

I don't think that the jref with it's high standards should tplerate common forgery. But if you guys think it is okay... well,that tells a lot.

there's your problem right there. highlighted and underlined

and the jref with its high standards tolerates you and your lies? so whats the problem?

 

[FineWine]

T.will have to prove how rubble can be created by local damage in contact and also prove how that can be compacted at the same time. Simultaneous breakage and compaction is a part of his problem.
So unless we are into another area of 9/11 physics expect more general obfuscation and time wasting. Maybe its better just to keep it as a switch to occasionally lash him across the legs with as the mood takes. lol.

You have run from every specific point the real engineers have made, you pathetic fraud. You keep parading your all-encompassing ignorance to challenge factual assertions made by people who know vastly more than you do.

WHAT DID MACKEY GET WRONG IN HIS LECTURE, BILL?

 

[stateofgrace]

Don't you know that a one-way crush down is not possible (topic)?

Isn't it ?, so all those physics texts books that state one lemon can crush nine other lemons are all wrong?

Who exactly are you hoping to convince with your rubbish ?

 

[FineWine]

You didn't really think that Truthers come here to convert jref people did you ? Speaking for myself I come here to embarrass you in front of whatever spectators there may be. I enjoy the tortured explanations and the pack animal mentality that is rife here. It really is a lesson in psychology that may someday soon be studied in University degree courses.

How do you "embarrass" the people who regularly humiliate you and expose you as a mindless, agenda-driven fraud? You haven't been right about anything since I joined this forum last spring.

Incidentally, explanations that are clear and correct do not qualify as "tortured" because the person at whom they're directed is too stupid to understand them.

 

[stateofgrace]

I don't think that the jref with it's high standards should tplerate common forgery. But if you guys think it is okay... well,that tells a lot.

Yep that's right Bill frauds and forgeries are pretty quickly exposed around here, guess you missed that part, right?

Talking of lying frauds, your guru made this claim

Originally Posted by Heiwa

In order to one-way crush down destroy WTC 1 and 2 you have to destroy the core ... at regular intervals. Controlled demolition is the only way.

He's wrong of course, because as you have pointed out the core survived. Care to explain why you are right and he is wrong ?

 

[bill smith]

How do you "embarrass" the people who regularly humiliate you and expose you as a mindless, agenda-driven fraud? You haven't been right about anything since I joined this forum last spring.

Incidentally, explanations that are clear and correct do not qualify as "tortured" because the person at whom they're directed is too stupid to understand them.

Embarrass,v.......def.....[Cause to be embarrassed; cause to feel self-conscious]

 

[FineWine]

I agreed that the video may have been doctored.

You presented this rubbish as your "evidence." You lack the skills to determine whether it was faked or not, so you simply assumed what you wanted to be true. It's magnanimous of you to admit that you got caught peddling garbage.

I don't think I made any claim about 'dustifiction '. You were the one to use that word I believe.

Actually, the people who post here remember you making a ludicrous, abortive attempt to flirt with the deranged Judy Wood's lunacy. You pretended to wonder about the missing steel that is not really missing until you were, as usual, crushed under the weight of the real evidence. You were peddling "dustification" all right, sport, you just got your butt handed to you.

You were the one to bring up euler buckling

You were the one who had never heard the term before and had no idea of what it meant.

Three out of three. Now who is wrong on every single topic ?

This is why you are treated with such well-deserved contempt. YOU were wrong on three out of three. YOU, Bill, got every single topic wrong. You always get it wrong, Bill. You never know what you're talking about, yet you try to condescend to people who are your intellectual superiors by several orders of magnitude.

PS. Here's that video again so people can see what we were talking about as regards the apparently crumbling core columns.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=NL&hl=nl&v=-dWBBEtA5bI

Same crap, Bill. You can never win.

 

[Oscar]

BS:

Embarrass,v.......def.....[Cause to be embarrassed; cause to feel self-conscious]

In order to feel self conscious one has to be conscious of one's own failings.

 

[FineWine]

That's a pity. I had hoped to walk you through the collapse sequence sometime soon and let you debunk my findings as we moved down the building. But if it is not to be ?....so be it. Have a nice life Newton and see you around.

Your unoriginal lies about the collapses have been debunked repeatedly for almost eight years. No fantasy concocted by agenda-driven crackpots has ever been debunked so thoroughly as the baseless idiocy about explosives in the twin towers. You are too obtuse to understand a word that is said to you. Why should a real engineer such as Newton's Bit waste his time on you? You refuse to make the slightest effort to clear away the compacted trash that prevents your brain from absorbing information.

 

[FineWine]

Embarrass,v.......def.....[Cause to be embarrassed; cause to feel self-conscious]

Brilliant rejoinder, Bill. Now, back to reality.

How do you embarrass people who always get the better of you--who always expose you as an unteachable know-nothing?

Tell us what Mackey got wrong, Bill. You can run, but you can't hide.