Moderated Bigfoot- Anybody Seen one?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Please show me the post in which i have claimed to see bigfoot. It should not be too hard for you, since you are quite confident.

actually I ust made it quite clear I was merely poking you with a stick for sport, and you're trying (BADLY) to turn the tables, even if you didnt say you saw a bigfoot I now demand you prove that the critter doesn't exist. Not opinions, facts. do it, now.

:eye-poppi
 
actually I ust made it quite clear I was merely poking you with a stick for sport, and you're trying (BADLY) to turn the tables, even if you didnt say you saw a bigfoot I now demand you prove that the critter doesn't exist. Not opinions, facts. do it, now.

You are kidding, right?

The burden of proof is not on me to prove it does not exist. The burden of proof is on you to prove that it does exist. By your logic, since Unicorns can not be proven to not exist, then they exist, right?

I may be considered a moron here, but even i know who the burden of proof is on!

I heard you say that you are a Bigfoot "enthusiast". What puts you in that camp?
 
Last edited:
You are kidding, right?

The burden of proof is not on me to prove it does not exist. The burden of proof is on you to prove that it does exist. By your logic, since Unicorns can not be proven to not exist, then they exist, right?

no, prove it doesnt

I may be considered a moron here, but even i know who the burden of proof is on!

I heard you say that you are a Bigfoot "enthusiast". What puts you in that camp?

that doesnt change your burden, you will answer, you cant seem to resist, so it cant possibly exist WHY?
 
bring it....

Very well then:

1. Every living organism, from Elephants to bacteria, leaves it own ecological impact on the environment. EX: a new predator is introduced into a large area full of deer. As time goes on, the deer population will start to decrease, due to the predator consuming them. Bigfoot, however, does not leave any ecological impact on its environment. There is no decrease in deer, elk, bear, plants, etc population, which you would expect if there was a breeding population of monstrous apes, which in reality there is no such thing.

2. Lack of remains- Every Animal, no matter how rare, has to leave remains behind. Scientists have no trouble finding a new species of insect in the remote, unaccessible areas of the Congo, yet no one can seem to find a population of hairy titans living in such close perimeters to people. The fact that nearly all of NA has been mapped and developed, yet not one finding of any large ape remains, makes the likelyhood of bigfoot plummet extremely low.

3. Lack of tools- If bigfoot has evaded man for all of these centuries, you would certainly expect tools and culture from such a smart species. The fact that bigfoot is never found, yet is described as smart as a bag of dirt, does not support consistency for it being a real species.

4. Every mammal, when giving birth, would be experiencing so much pain, which would make them scream their heads off. A sasquatch would require a huge voicebox, and if ever in a painful situation, its voice would certainly be heard for miles and miles.

5. Not all forests remote- Even the Dark, mysterious forests of the PNW are surveyed and mapped to death. Wildlife biologists and park rangers do travel great distances and cover so much land that any large species would be found by now.

6. Why so few sightings?- If this thing is real, it has to have an MVP (Minimum viable population) of around 4000. If this were the case, people would be running into these things daily, not once in every blue moon.

7. No consistent behavior- No one has ever reported seeing a bigfoot give birth, mate, or fight with each other, all of which you would see in a real population of a REAL species.

8. Bigfoot is reported in all 50 states, yet not one sighting has ever lead to good evidence.

9. Where the tracks lead to- A couple 1000 of these Hairy giants would certainly leave trackways behind. Don't you think that at least one trackway would lead you to your grand prize?

I am waiting, Mikey
 
Last edited:
Last of the Neanderthals hiding out in the vast forests of Siberia and Canada. And as an evolutionary tool for survival, natural selection favored the psychic ones. That's why you can never catch em! They know you are coming! Ever been to Bowron lakes wilderness in Northern BC? You can just feel the emptiness as you gaze north and east knowing you could travel for months in a straight line and not see a soul
 
Mabyev the Neandertthals were driven north by the Crog Magnons and American Indians. The end of the ice age at the same time enabled them to find a niche in areas newly melted out and colonized by plants and animals, but still too cold for farming or too remote for human hunter/ gatherers who were beginning to concentrate in villages or permanent camps. Perhaps they became so terrified of human contact because ethnic cleansing was practiced on them, that they avoided us at all costs, developing keen senses like those of a cougar to alert them to our presence. Cougars are quite common and yet VERY rarely seen in a wilderness setting. Just musing around, postulating on how Big Foot could possibly exist. Its the no body has ever been found that is the logic fly in the ointment. They dispose of their dead like we do?
 
Mabyev the Neandertthals were driven north by the Crog Magnons and American Indians.

Unlikely

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_peoples_of_the_Americas

According to the still-debated New World migration model, a migration of humans from Eurasia to the Americas took place via Beringia, a land bridge which allegedly connected the two continents across what is now the Bering Strait. The most recent point at which this migration could have taken place is c. 12,000 years ago,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal

No definite specimens younger than 30,000 years ago have been found
 
Okay Alaska too. Wherever it is still somewhat ice age-ish, and human density is still low

The problem is that no known species of great ape lives in cold environments. All known species live in tropical climates. So if bigfoot exists in the cold environments, then it is likely an offshoot of the Neanderthal.
 
The problem is that no known species of great ape lives in cold environments. All known species live in tropical climates. So if bigfoot exists in the cold environments, then it is likely an offshoot of the Neanderthal.


Homo Sapiens is known to inhabit cold climates.


That is true, but i was referring to great ape species that generally prefer cold climates, and that number is: ZERO


Fail
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom