Senenmut
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2008
- Messages
- 1,372
So, in other words:
1. Despite being shown the discrepancies, you are STILL duped by the copy you brought to the discussion, which is absolutely and irrefutably a forgery; and
2. Because it doesn't match the earlier version, you now accuse us of "erasing" parts of it, thus implying we're complicit.
Add that to the fact it's nonsense to begin with -- seriously, Red Mercury is about the stupidest hoax ever invented, and it's on that page too -- and yet you still support it??
In light of the above evidence, I am forced to conclude that you simply aren't very smart. I mean that with all due respect. Back to Ignore with you, you've earned it.
about red mercury, even if there is no such thing as real red mercury, it sounds like they were still making money selling the stuff (and in sting operations).
http://www.ricekiller.com/forums/showthread.php?t=27903
is this real **** or just fake red mercury.
"Another find was a bottle of Red Mercury. Now this was a big deal for me. In order for a nuclear bomb to created fusion, you need fission, which is why nuclear missles are so complex. Back in the peak of the Cold War, the USSR came out with a story that stated they developed a chemical that could create fusion WITHOUT fission, thus creating the capabilites for the possibility of a small, cheap nuclear mega-ton bomb. It was called Red Mercury. Most people say it was just some urban legend that was whipped up by the Soviets to sell some crap on the black market for $200K-$300K per ounce (which they did). No tests have ever proved that this substance actually worked. It was produced on the USSR and Eat Germany, from what I know. It just goes to show what extent Iraq was taking to create something for mass destruction."
