I wonder why you skipped the part about Irgun, Ezel and Stern.
your view in the matter is totaly onesided. but the reality is not that onesided.
Did Irgun et al. initiate the '48 War? (Answer: No)
Laying the blame without any historical evidence, other than a sense of an "atmosphere" of expulsions. As if, Ben-Gurion gave orders through mental telepathy.
no
the announcement on 14.Mai 1948 and the reaction of Arab leaders led to the war.
Fair enough since the Holocaust is misused to further Israels interests, shut up opponents and to justify enormously stupid and violent policies
No, Holocaust and Shoah aren't historical facts that legitimize their usage for propaganda purposes after the Nazi-era
Who caused the Holocaust? A bunch of Judism-loving religious nuts who rather loved to be exterminated than giving up their religious stance for the sake of peace in the religious/political environement they lived in?![]()
he argued that "the Holocaust probably never had happened if the Jews wouldn't have sticked to their religion and instead, integrated themselves into European societies so they wouldn't have been the scapegoat for centuries".
Morris cites expulsion orders signed by Moshe Carmel and Yitzhak Rabin. Ben-Gurion does not need to be telepathic: Morris says he met with Moshe Carmel and Yitzhak Rabin before the expulsion orders were signed. Rabin noted the event in his diary: Ben-Gurion communicated with a gesture.
Ignore the evidence all you like.
This is the result of the cleverness of Benny Morris. Morris is interviewed and two people of diametrically opposing viewpoints use his
comments--comments contained in the same interview--to support their divergent views. Brilliant!
Morris said:In the months of April-May 1948, units of the Haganah [the pre-state defense force that was the precursor of the IDF] were given operational orders that stated explicitly that they were to uproot the villagers, expel them and destroy the villages themselves.
Benny Morris said:"From April 1948, Ben-Gurion is projecting a message of transfer. There is no explicit order of his in writing, there is no orderly comprehensive policy, but there is an atmosphere of [population] transfer. The transfer idea is in the air. The entire leadership understands that this is the idea. The officer corps understands what is required of them. Under Ben-Gurion, a consensus of transfer is created."
What do you think is at the heart of this brilliance? Morris' rhetoric or your nakba-denying super-powers?
All this bickering about historians just proves to show what I've been saying all along: whatever happened, it happened and MOVE ON!
Stop whining about the past and live side by side already.
Since you are unable to articulate in precise terms how this alleged nakba manifests itself, you prolly ought to refrain from going there, again.
There is no explicit order of his in writing, there is no orderly comprehensive policy, but there is an atmosphere of [population] transfer. The transfer idea is in the air. The entire leadership understands that this is the idea.
Can you bring yourself to state what you think happened?
One person reads Morris' answer to the question: "According to your findings, how many acts of Israeli massacre were perpetrated in 1948?" and understands the meaning of "Nakba" -- the other person asks "so what's this about a catastrophe?"
There is a palpable atmosphere of hatred against the Jews in the Middle East, there is this idea of pushing them back to the sea, so therefore can we say there is a Holocaust going on, since we're talking of ideas in the air?
I don't give a **** what happened.
Such wisdom.
I guess you don't give a **** if it all happens again. Did you read part 2 of Morris' interview? I guess not, because you have the wisdom to not give a **** about what happens to people about whom you don't give a ****.