Ed 30... make that 35 Years Ago: Nixon Resigned

Brown

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
12,984
Today, 9 August 2004, is the 30th anniversary of the resignation of Richard M. Nixon from the office of President of the United States.

It is unfortunate that the historical reasons for the resignation have been clouded in the national consciousness. Few people know why Nixon got caught up in the Watergate scandal. Even fewer understand why Watergate was a scandal. Still fewer know why he resigned. Nixon himself asserted that the reason for his resignation was not any wrongdoing on his part; rather, he blamed Congress for his resignation, as the members of Congress no longer provided him with political support to achieve any of his goals:
In the past few days, however, it has become evident to me that I no longer have a strong enough political base in the Congress to justify continuing that effort. As long as there was such a base, I felt strongly that it was necessary to see the constitutional process through to its conclusion, that to do otherwise would be unfaithful to the spirit of that deliberately difficult process and a dangerously destabilizing precedent for the future.

But with the disappearance of that base, I now believe that the constitutional purpose has been served, and there is no longer a need for the process to be prolonged.
...
From the discussions I have had with Congressional and other leaders, I have concluded that because of the Watergate matter I might not have the support of the Congress that I would consider necessary to back the very difficult decisions and carry out the duties of this office in the way the interests of the Nation would require.
What had Nixon done? He had put into operation a secret system of spying and sabotaging his enemies. His enemies were not foreign enemies, but domestic enemies, Americans who shared political views that differed from his own. The Watergate burglary was one of many covert operations carried out by Nixon's supporters.

After the burglars got caught, they basically put the squeeze on the White House for money. Nixon realized (as he had been explicitly told by his chief of staff) that the money used to fund many of these covert operations, including the Watergate burglary, could be traced to his own reelection committee.

As recordings of his conversations showed, Nixon was fully aware of code names for the covert operations, and the fact that covert operations existed was no surprise to him. There is little evidence that Nixon participated in planning the Watergate burglary, or authorizing it in advance. There is considerably more evidence that top-ranking members of Nixon's staff authorized the operation.

One of the recordings of Nixon's White House conversations included something very serious: Nixon directed his people to tell the FBI and the Justice Department not to investigate any further into the Watergate matter. The reason? Good old "National Security." It was a completely bogus reason, and it did not withstand examination.

There was much more to the story, but in the end, Nixon had been caught in several very public lies. Many in Congress had supported the president in his public announcements, only to find that recordings of his White House conversations showed that the president's public pronouncements had been false. Some of these supporters, who understandably felt betrayed, withdrew their support. In his resignation speech, Nixon said they, not him, were responsible for his decision to resign.

Nixon was never impeached. Had he not resigned, he surely would have been.

The Nixon presidency has been likened to a Shakespearean tragedy. The analogy is apt. Nixon had the potential to be one of the greatest presidents in the history of the country, but his mistrust of people and the political process doomed his chances for success. His many accomplishments have been overshadowed by a sequence of events that were politically unnecessary: a sequence of events that Nixon could have easily avoided.
 
C-Span ran an interview with Nixon (from 1992) after he wrote a book, whose title I'm blanking on. He displayed a lot of candor in the interview and never played down the Watergate debacle. He also never 'fessed up to any wrong doing as well. He seemed especially proud of the fact he opened up China to the western world.

I must admit he came across as a damn charming fellow. I never really noticed his charisma before.

Charlie ("I am no criminal") Monoxide
 
Bumped in anticipation of the 35th Anniversary of Nixon's downfall.

Additional threads discussing Nixon's resignation appear here and here.
 
I was twenty-one years old in 1974 when Nixon resigned. At the time, I thought he was the most evil man in the world. In retrospect, I realize that this was highly politicized and I was very naive. He was a nasty, smutty, bigoted, paranoid, hateful man, but as for evil, many people have outdone him. In truth, he taught me a lot about politics and what a dirty business it is. He made me more skeptical and more cynical. Maybe he deserves some thanks for being the bad example that opened my eyes.

He still deserved to go to prison for a long time. Better people than him did time, including his subordinates that he threw under the bus.
 
I have bumped the thread because I have noticed a sad decline in the understanding of the so-called "Watergate" events, and how they led to Nixon's downfall. There are very few who know the players and the dynamics and the interests and the twists and the back-stabbings and heroics.

It will not surprise me one bit if one or more self-proclaimed news organizations run stories that: (1) are overly simplistic if not factually wrong; (2) show that the public has largely forgotten what Watergate is about--and that many members of the public never knew in the first place.

I wonder whether the experience might be comparable to that of a witness to the US Civil War, who, near the turn of the century, saw that his fellows had forgotten why the war was fought--and that many of his fellows never really knew what the war was about in the first place. It may have been that at around 1900, it was "common knowledge" that "The Civil War was fought to end slavery." Many say such a thing even today. And though there is truth in it, the causes and dynamics of the war were far more complicated.

How am I supposed to feel when someone suggests that Nixon resigned because he helped plot a break-in at a hotel? (See this thread, in which Penn Jillette erroneously--and apparently seriously--says that Watergate involved people had breaking into a psychiatrist's office in a hotel.) There is some truth in it, but it misses the key facts and interreactions among the players... as well as the historical lessons. In the coming days, I am almost dreading listening to people discuss the following questions.

Why did Nixon resign?

What did Nixon do wrong?

Was the whole thing just a charade trumped up by the Democratic party to force Nixon from power?
 
I have bumped the thread because I have noticed a sad decline in the understanding of the so-called "Watergate" events, and how they led to Nixon's downfall. There are very few who know the players and the dynamics and the interests and the twists and the back-stabbings and heroics.

My all-time favorite Watergate (non-scoundrel) was Martha Mitchell and her drunken (maybe) phone calls to reporters regarding her insider information regarding Watergate. She was villified by Nixon but it turned out a lot of what she said was correct.
 
My all-time favorite Watergate (non-scoundrel) was Martha Mitchell and her drunken (maybe) phone calls to reporters regarding her insider information regarding Watergate. She was villified by Nixon but it turned out a lot of what she said was correct.

Drunk Dial for Justice!
 
Here is a link to a thread about the resignation of Richard Nixon and what his offense was.

I had just come back from a chemistry lab when I heard the news. Nobody was surprised. Nixon's web of lies had been tightening around him for weeks. Several of his co-conspirators were already charged with crimes. The so-called "smoking gun" tape and the 18½ minute gap in another one of the recordings were the nails in the coffin.

What I will never understand though is why Nixon recorded everything. As paranoid a person as he was, I would think that he would realize that such a record could be used against him. Maybe he wasn't very techno-savvy, I dunno. It certainly taught a lesson to future presidents, and by the time the Iran-Contra scandal was big news, no recordings of anything were to be found, and the term "plausible deniability" became popular.

It was a time that changed the nation, some for better some for worse. Presidents have more accountability than they once did, but now, every little mistake results in a cry for impeachment. Also it created the practice of tacking "gate" to almost every scandal. Maybe that was the worst effect.:D
 
Alan Greenspan has a fascinating section in his autobiography about Nixon. As you may know, Greenspan worked as an economic advisor for Nixon and Ford. He tells a story about how he went to a meeting that Nixon had called. Greenspan came in with all his economic figures and was prepared to talk fiscal policy, but was unexpectedly treated to a diatribe about how they needed to defeat the opposition and how the Dems were the enemy, etc.

He said Nixon and Clinton were "by far the smartest presidents [he] worked with", but Nixon had an angry, bitter side to him that would eventually be his downfall. Greenspan writes this:

A member of the Clinton administration once was accusing Nixon of anti-Semitism, and I said "You don't understand. He wasn't exclusively anti-Semitic. He was anti-Semitic, anti-Italian, anti-Greek, anti-Slovak. I don't know anybody he was pro. He hated everybody. He would say awful things about Henry Kissinger, yet he appointed him secretary of state."
 
I heard an interesting observation on NPR not too long ago about Nixon. By today's standards, Nixon would be considered too liberal for some hard-core conservatives. Nixon started the EPA, opened the door to China and almost pulled off a National healthcare program with the help of Ted Kennedy. How do you think some of the conservative radio talk show hosts would react to all that?

Michael
 
I heard an interesting observation on NPR not too long ago about Nixon. By today's standards, Nixon would be considered too liberal for some hard-core conservatives. Nixon started the EPA, opened the door to China and almost pulled off a National healthcare program with the help of Ted Kennedy. How do you think some of the conservative radio talk show hosts would react to all that?


Well, I've also heard some liberals take issue with that assessment. I've heard it argued that he was pretty much concerned mostly with foreign policy, and basically signed whatever bill was put in front of him because he wasn't interested in putting up a fight on domestic issues.
 
I heard an interesting observation on NPR not too long ago about Nixon. By today's standards, Nixon would be considered too liberal for some hard-core conservatives. Nixon started the EPA, opened the door to China and almost pulled off a National healthcare program with the help of Ted Kennedy. How do you think some of the conservative radio talk show hosts would react to all that?

Michael

Not to mention wage and price controls and food stamps. Nixon was always a moderate, but because he was hated on the Vietnam War issue by the left they blew him up into this awful bogeyman (I was on the left at the time and bought it). His presidency was in many ways more liberal than Clinton's but not for their respective times. Clinton was about as liberal as he could be and still get elected; Nixon was about as conservative as he could be and still get elected.
 
My Name is Ricky Nixon, & It's Trouble I Yam Fixin'

...I never really noticed his charisma before....

That makes two of us, only I still haven't.

I'm older than Tricky, and I remember Dick Nixon from waaaay back. People didn't loathe him (few really hated the man; hatred is like ammunition, you save it for a worthwhile target) on ideological grounds but rather for the way he made them feel.

How did it feel to have Nixon to kick around? Dirty, disgusting, and embarassing. You felt half-foolish; how could you endure a guy like that in public life?

People say he was intelligent? Really? How does an intelligent man get himself into such a sordid hole? Maybe I define "intelligence" too broadly, but I don't see anything in the life and times of Nichard Rixon that rises higher than low cunning. Hell, any fool can tell lies.

We've all known small-statured men who give the impression of being taller than they are; self-respect can account for that, and of course respect for others. Betcha didn't know that Nixie stood 5'11". I've talked to people who met him, and plenty of others who saw him on public occasions, and they all remember him as short and hunched -- about 5'6". How often do you encounter a man like that? How do you explain him when you do?

Long before his downfall, I made myself a little promise: someday, I'm going to whizz on R. Nixon's grave. I expect I'll have to stand in line.
 
Last edited:
That makes two of us, only I still haven't.

I'm older than Tricky, and I remember Dick Nixon from waaaay back. People didn't loathe him (few really hated the man; hatred is like ammunition, you save it for a worthwhile target) on ideological grounds but rather for the way he made them feel.

How did it feel to have Nixon to kick around? Dirty, disgusting, and embarassing. You felt half-foolish; how could you endure a guy like that in public life?

People say he was intelligent? Really? How does an intelligent man get himself into such a sordid hole? Maybe I define "intelligence" too broadly, but I don't see anything in the life and times of Nichard Rixon that rises higher than low cunning. Hell, any fool can tell lies.

You think there is a good connection between inteligence and wisdom? Isn't woo very common at Mensa meetings?
 

Back
Top Bottom