• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

9/11-investigator explains the Holocaust

Status
Not open for further replies.
SimonD said:
And there you have it folks, the admission that the Jews got that they deserved in WW2 - ie the holocaust.
Click to expand...

Maybe my mistake in English... I mean to say: they were in the process of imposing their lies upon the world. Failed first time, succeeded the second time.
 
9/11-investigator said:
The Origin of the 6 Million

David Irving - Nuremberg, the last battle

p99. A few days before leaving for London Jackson visited F.B.I. officials in New York on June 11, 1945. Here he had, probably not at his own wish, his first meeting with several powerful Jewish organisations who had already made quite clear to him they wanted a hand in running the trial. In an office provided by the F.B.I. in the Federal Building, three leading lawyers, Judge Nathan Perlman, Dr Jacob Robinson, and Dr Alexander Kohanski, came to exert pressure on behalf of a coalition of representative American organisations.
HOW GREAT were those losses? inquired Jackson, seeking a figure to use at the coming trial. ‘Six million,’ responded Dr Robinson, and indicated that the figure included Jews in all Nazi-occupied lands ‘from the Channel to Stalingrad.’

(9/11-Investigator: he probably pushed the piece of candy he had in his mouth with his tongue from his left cheek to the right one one second after he had dropped the 6M figure.)
Jackson noted that day: I was particularly interested in knowing the source and reliability of his estimate as I know no authentic data on it.
p100. Robinson said that he had arrived at his figure by extrapolation from the known statistics for the Jewish population in 1929 and those believed to be surviving now. In other words his figure was somewhere between a hopeful estimate and an educated guess. ‘The differences
are assumed to be killed or in hiding,’ he said. Given the turmoils and tragedies of a war-torn Europe ravaged by bombs and plagues, it was not a data basis on which a statistician would properly have relied.
Where were the shifting frontiers? Who, indeed, was a Jew? These were questions about which cartographers, ethnographers, religious fanatics, and politicians are still at each other’s throats. Six million? By sad but extraordinary coincidence, the American Jewish community had
raised a similar outcry about a ‘holocaust’ a quarter of a century earlier, after World War One. In a 1919 speech the governor of New York, Martin Glynn, had claimed that ‘six million’ Jews were being exterminated:

Source: ‘The Crucifixion of the Jews Must Stop,’ in American Hebrew, Oct 31, 1919.
Here is the article in 'The American Hebrew' from 1919 where Jews complain to be murdered by the '6 millions'. Utter lies of course, as always.
Click to expand...

Everybody freaking knows that we only have rough estimate of the actual number of victims.
Actual number are estimated to be somewhere between 5.1 and 7 millions.
We, nonetheless, have the name of close to 3 million individual victims that we know disappeared while in the hands of the Nazis.



They had it coming.
Click to expand...
Then why all the lies, you monster?
 
Last edited:
How about everyone just putting 9/11-investigator on ignore? We'd surely save a few baby whales or something... That could also be a default policy for new users on this forum. Whoever proves that they get some value from his ramblings (except what has already been said) should win the MDC instantly.
 
laca said:
How about everyone just putting 9/11-investigator on ignore? We'd surely save a few baby whales or something... That could also be a default policy for new users on this forum. Whoever proves that they get some value from his ramblings (except what has already been said) should win the MDC instantly.
Click to expand...
I'm learning a lot of about the Nuremburg trials and the hatred and delusion filled mindset of Holocaust Deniers and Anti-semites. I didn't know they were this hate filled and nuts.
 
9/11-investigator said:
Do you think it is wise to reveal your pure evil spirit for all the world to see?

Not that FineWine will call you a monster, don't worry.

Thanks for showing who the real haters are.
Click to expand...

Because we all know that Nazis love everyone and don't have a bad word to say about anyone
 
paximperium said:
I'm learning a lot of about the Nuremburg trials and the hatred and delusion filled mindset of Holocaust Deniers and Anti-semites. I didn't know they were this hate filled and nuts.
Click to expand...

Yes. But that all has been already said. That's why I stated except what has already been said.
 
9/11-investigator said:
Do you think it is wise to reveal your pure evil spirit for all the world to see?

Not that FineWine will call you a monster, don't worry.

Thanks for showing who the real haters are.
Click to expand...
The A-Bomb was a valid weapon to be used by the Allies against their enemies. Why is it "evil" to drop a nuke onto an enemy?
 
paximperium said:
The A-Bomb was a valid weapon to be used by the Allies against their enemies. Why is it "evil" to drop a nuke onto an enemy?
Click to expand...

Depends. Are you the type of person who prefers to kill enemy soldiers, or enemy civilians?

Or don't you distinguish?
 
SimonD said:
Because we all know that Nazis love everyone and don't have a bad word to say about anyone
Click to expand...

American monsters on their way winning hearts and minds wherever they go:

Hiroshima.jpg


imgres


Warning graphic: http://people.moreheadstate.edu/students/alsimp01/images/hiroshima1.gif

American exceptionalism in action.

Iraq, 1 million deaths based on neocon (=Jewish) lies.

If it were up to I Ratant America would holocaust everybody who opposes American 'benevolence'.

Next likely slaughter house: Iran. Because Israel wants it.
 
Last edited:
drkitten said:
Depends. Are you the type of person who prefers to kill enemy soldiers, or enemy civilians?

Or don't you distinguish?
Click to expand...
It depends. I consider the firebombing of industrial centers to be valid at that time. The use of a nuke on an industrial center would have been valid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom