• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

9/11-investigator explains the Holocaust

Status
Not open for further replies.
I believe the core of naziism as it was actually practised was:
Kill everyone you don't know.
When you can't do that, kill everyone you know.
When you can't do that, kill yourself.
Step 3 is highly recommended to all nazis, neo- or whatever.

Please do not even joke about advocating suicide.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Uzzy said:
It appears that the fascist wants a united Europe, probably without the Jews, I'm guessing? Shame that was already tried. Guess who lost.

While I don't normally advocate Wikipedia as a source for academic work, I feel this page is highly informative on the nature of the German-Soviet talks. It's exceedingly well sourced and quite in depth. Not something that gets mentioned much, especially not by the fascist here. I'll respond to the one semi-intellectual point made by him though.

While my voting history would seem to counter the idea that I'm a 'crypto-communist', I suppose the fascist would consider anyone slightly to the left of Hitler as one, so it's not really an issue. No matter.

Once again the fascist gets history wrong, and misses my point. Roosevelt had always publically demanded the right of self-determination in Eastern Europe, insisting that Stalin should abide by it. Privately he may have felt differently, but when it came to the Yalta negotiations, the text said, and I quote.. "to create democratic institutions of their own choice. This is a principle of the Atlantic Charter -- the right of all peoples to choose the form of government under which they will live". Roosevelt still had faith that Stalin would come to a compromise, at the very least to look good on the international stage, and allow some sort of elections within the Eastern European nations that the Soviets currently controlled. Even Churchill felt that Stalin would keep his promises over Poland.

As it turned out, Stalin didn't keep his promises. The trial of the sixteen, and the sham elections carried out in 1947 showed that Stalin wouldn't work with the West. By that point, Stalin had de facto control over those areas, and short of provoking a full scale war, the west couldn't do anything about it. Regardless, it's one of the reasons why relations between Stalin and the West broke down after the war, which led to the Cold War.

Anyway, it's clear that you, being a fascist, can't physically understand complex history. No wonder you have to reduce every major event to 'Joo's did it!'.

By the way, here's another fascist killing weapon we Brits know how to use well. Shame we missed a few, but I think on the whole we did rather well. All the United Nations did well, by the way. Funny how fascists had very few countries under their control and found fewer friends, while liberal democracies have allies all around the world.

[qimg]http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/800px-lee-enfield-rifle.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

The Lee Enfield was probably the best Bolt Action Military rifle every designed, but I still prefer this sucker for quick disposal of Nazis:



 
It's the other way around. European Civilization (either in Europe or America) has always been the beacon of the world. European Civilization is the Godliest there has ever been on this planet. All other civilizations crumble in comparison. And here comes a bunch of Ukrainian Khazars calling themselves Jews since 800 AD or so and want to subjugate us and destroy us in order to replace us with the hordes of the third world in order to divide society so you can function as middlemen and hold all the power. You want to kill the aristocrats like you did in Russia ('Kill the best Gentiles'/'Tob Shebbe Goyim Harog!'). You represent the ugliest, cruellest, most tyrannical and loveless creatures to walk the surface of this planet. That's why you killed The Best Gentile JFK: he wanted to take the FED from you. He wanted to prevent Israel acquiring nuclear weapons. And most of all you wanted to get this Texan Jew Lyndon Baines Johnson in power without the hassle of getting him elected first. The first thing he did was signing the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 that laid the basis of the destruction of European Society on American soil which is now irreversible thereby finishing almost a century of preparation to achieve this goal.
Click to expand...

:drinkspit:
 
NWO Sentryman said:
but didn't the nazis have plans for von braun stations? Antigravity? IR vision? fighter jets? rockets? Diebner? Mietner? Sarin as well as other crazy stuff in My tank is fight.
Click to expand...

Like this?

nazakuarticle.jpg
 
Hitler represented the angry German underclass. And the underclass that's not where my sympathies lie
Click to expand...

Naturally, as you consider yourself immensely superior to, well, everybody.
 
Another of the (many) things that don't make sense in 9/11-investigator's world is that, apparently, the sole purpose of the Jews, when coming to a country, is to destroy it. And when it IS destroyed, they move on to another country.

Why? Why bother? If the LIKE destroyed countries, why don't they do it once and stay in the desroyed country? If they don't, why do they destroy the country in the first place? I mean, what's the point? It's not like they're Nazis, after all -- now, THAT was a wholly destructive philosophy whose sole goal was destruction for destruction's sake.

Think about it. As evil as the inquisition or Stalin were, even Islamic fundamentalism, Catholicism and Marxism's philosophies contributed SOMETHING to humanity, even if the damage they did far outweighted the contribution. Nazism contributed, literally, nothing. There was not ONE great Nazi philosopher, novelist, composer, artist, or architect. It's influence was 100% negative in EVERYTHING.
 
Last edited:
GreNME said:
Like this?

[qimg]http://image.grenme.com/thread/nazakuarticle.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...


That is from the PC Game "Silent Storm" isn't it?
That game frustrated me, for the first two thirds it was a very good..and quite realistic,,portrayal of WW2 combat on the squad level, but then in the last third they blew it with a bunch of Crappy Sci Fi, of which the "Kliene Panzers" were the worst.
 
Skeptic said:
Another of the (many) things that don't make sense in 9/11-investigator's world is that, apparently, the sole purpose of the Jews, when coming to a country, is to destroy it. And when it IS destroyed, they move on to another country.

Why? Why bother? If the LIKE destroyed countries, why don't they do at once and stay in the desroyed country? What's the point?
Click to expand...


Because they are EVIL!
 
Hi! New page, new re-post of HeyLeroy's never-answered-in-18-thread-pages response to 9/11-I's request for evidence.

I'll just keep posting this until it gets a reply from the person who asked for it, namely 9/11-I.

HeyLeroy said:
1. Written documents--Orders for Zyklon-B gas, blueprints and orders for building materials for the crematoria, etc.

2. Eyewitness testimony--Sonderkommando diaries, confessions of guards and commandants, etc.

3. Photographs--Not only of the camps, but especially interesting are the secret photos taken of the burning of bodies that were smuggled out of Auschwitz.

4. The camps themselves--forensic tests have now been conducted demonstrating the homicidal use of both the gas chambers and the crematoria for the express purpose of exterminating large numbers of prisoners (Pressac, 1989; Pressac and Van Pelt, 1994).

5. Negative evidence--we have documentation of the numbers of prisoners shipped to the various camps, the numbers that were transferred, and the number liberated. The difference between the latter with the former two figures gives an approximation of the numbers who died or were killed (see Hilberg, 1961).

Proving the Gas Chambers & Crematoria
Click to expand...
 
Skeptic said:
You know, I never understood the problem the Nazis have with "Jewish world domination", even if it were true.

Suppose for a minute the Jews really DO control everything and rule the world. Well, since -- according to Nazi philosophy -- might makes right and weakness is a sin, they DESERVE to rule the world, since being strong enough to rule the world ipso facto means you deserve to, and if you are too weak to resist it ipso facto means you deserve to be ruled and oppressed.

Another thing: sometimes the Nazis claim that racial superiority, as measured by IQ, is the real measure of who "deserves" to rule the world. Well, if that is true, then Jews as a group usually come out on top of such IQ tests (I keep wondering how, the number of stupid Jews I know being rather high, but I digress.).

So by the Nazis' very own philosophy, the Jews -- either by their incredible secret power or else by their superior IQ -- deserve to control the world, which they, again by the Nazis' very own view, actually do.

So what's the problem?

:con2:
Click to expand...

I think the problem is that the Jews don´t control the world by means of brainless, brute force, like real Herrenmenschen would. Achieving a goal my means of intellect and cunning is apparently completely un-Aryan.
 
I wonder what is going to happen to all the "Non Europeans" in 9/11 Investigator's 'Pure Europe".
 
dudalb said:
That is from the PC Game "Silent Storm" isn't it?
That game frustrated me, for the first two thirds it was a very good..and quite realistic,,portrayal of WW2 combat on the squad level, but then in the last third they blew it with a bunch of Crappy Sci Fi, of which the "Kliene Panzers" were the worst.
Click to expand...

Actually seems pretty fun. I wonder if it runs on Vista...
 
Simon39759 said:
Actually seems pretty fun. I wonder if it runs on Vista...
Click to expand...

It is not a bad game, It's just it was marketed as a straight WW2 game, plays that way for 85% of the game, and then in the last few levels all this really Bad Sci Fi Stuff comes in out of nowhere. It's like playing the original "Call of Duty" and the, in the last few levels, the Aliens from "Half life" start showing up.
It should run fine on Vista,since it came out in 2004,not that long ago.
Anyway, Vista will soon be history.
 
dudalb said:
I wonder what is going to happen to all the "Non Europeans" in 9/11 Investigator's 'Pure Europe".
Click to expand...

Since non-Europeans do not exist in "Pure Europe", they will all be encouraged to no longer exist. Let them have a nice little shower in a camp somewhere, or delouse their clothing... something like that should do the trick. That routine almost worked last time, so why change it?
 
Chaos said:
Since non-Europeans do not exist in "Pure Europe", they will all be encouraged to no longer exist. Let them have a nice little shower in a camp somewhere, or delouse their clothing... something like that should do the trick. That routine almost worked last time, so why change it?
Click to expand...

or maybe be sent on a ship to madagscar.
 
The Origin of the 6 Million

David Irving - Nuremberg, the last battle

p99. A few days before leaving for London Jackson visited F.B.I. officials in New York on June 11, 1945. Here he had, probably not at his own wish, his first meeting with several powerful Jewish organisations who had already made quite clear to him they wanted a hand in running the trial. In an office provided by the F.B.I. in the Federal Building, three leading lawyers, Judge Nathan Perlman, Dr Jacob Robinson, and Dr Alexander Kohanski, came to exert pressure on behalf of a coalition of representative American organisations.

HOW GREAT were those losses? inquired Jackson, seeking a figure to use at the coming trial. ‘Six million,’ responded Dr Robinson, and indicated that the figure included Jews in all Nazi-occupied lands ‘from the Channel to Stalingrad.’

(9/11-Investigator: he probably pushed the piece of candy he had in his mouth with his tongue from his left cheek to the right one one second after he had dropped the 6M figure.)

Jackson noted that day: I was particularly interested in knowing the source and reliability of his estimate as I know no authentic data on it.

p100. Robinson said that he had arrived at his figure by extrapolation from the known statistics for the Jewish population in 1929 and those believed to be surviving now. In other words his figure was somewhere between a hopeful estimate and an educated guess. ‘The differences
are assumed to be killed or in hiding,’ he said. Given the turmoils and tragedies of a war-torn Europe ravaged by bombs and plagues, it was not a data basis on which a statistician would properly have relied.
Where were the shifting frontiers? Who, indeed, was a Jew? These were questions about which cartographers, ethnographers, religious fanatics, and politicians are still at each other’s throats. Six million? By sad but extraordinary coincidence, the American Jewish community had
raised a similar outcry about a ‘holocaust’ a quarter of a century earlier, after World War One. In a 1919 speech the governor of New York, Martin Glynn, had claimed that ‘six million’ Jews were being exterminated:

Source: ‘The Crucifixion of the Jews Must Stop,’ in American Hebrew, Oct 31, 1919.

Here is the article in 'The American Hebrew' from 1919 where Jews complain to be murdered by the '6 millions'. Utter lies of course, as always.

They had it coming.

More on the '6 million'.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom