New study supports WTC controlled demolition

[NWO Sentryman]

Is it just me? :
The Journal of 9/11 Stundies

hey, that's my joke!

 

[Dave Rogers]

Are there any "papers" in the Journal of 9/11 Studies that don't support the truthers conspiracy theories?

Gregory Urich tried to submit one. They pretended they were closing the journal down so as to avoid having to publish it.

Dave

 

[Blender Head]

Gregory Urich tried to submit one. They pretended they were closing the journal down so as to avoid having to publish it.

Dave

That's very amusing-- any source for that? I'd love to read about it.

 

[lightfire22000]

Oh my stars, the Religion Professor cited YOUTUBE COMMENTS in an end note.

Unfreakingbelievable.

Where do you think he wrote his doctoral thesis?

 

[Hokulele]

That's very amusing-- any source for that? I'd love to read about it.

This thread describes the aftermath.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=117267

 

[NWO Sentryman]

Where do you think he wrote his doctoral thesis?

wikipedia?

 

[Horatius]

hey, that's my joke!

I've been pronouncing it that way for years!


ETA: And so has LashL!

The *cough* "journal" of 9/11 Stundies has always been a pathetic mockery of a "journal" and has never had any legitimacy whatsoever.

 

[1337m4n]

I consider both the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory’s seismic evidence and the evidence provided by a less studied form of seismic instrument, the video camera.

...

...

...Is the author some kind of idiot?

 

[1337m4n]

*skims through paper*



Oh, I get it now. The author is a moron who thinks that a shaking camera is indicative of a major seismic disturbance.

Those cameras were being ACTIVELY MANIPULATED by HUMAN HANDS! LOL!




Well, that took a good ten seconds to debunk. What's next, 9/11 Investigator?

 

[1337m4n]

Anybody still interested in this topic might want to check out this thread.