• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Recent climate observations disagreement with projections

MattusMaximus said:
Blame yourself for attempting to spam the Forum. If you'd adhere to the same rules as the rest of us, this wouldn't be a problem
Click to expand...
What rule prevents me from starting a topic regarding a recently released paper in the journal Nature?

What rule prevents me from responding to comments against me in topics? Apparently others can attempt to slander me but I cannot defend myself? I suppose that is the special rule here? Anyone with half a brain can see this is happening.
 
Last edited:
Poptech said:
No I Haven't my replies have been consistently edited. Which makes it impossible for me to continue a previous discussion in many cases because the original comments by others are left intact validating them by censoring my reply. You don't see the moved posts or what was said just the moderated edit. There is no trick, only the use of moderators to control/restrict what I can say.
Click to expand...

Poptech has been CHEATED!!! CHEATED I say!!!

Shades of Ms. Connie Sonne :rolleyes:
 
DogB said:
It varies. The two data sets aren't measuring exactly the same thing, so obviously there's some differences. They do seem to be drifting apart just a bit - most obviously in the last couple of years.

What that means – your guess is almost certainly better than mine.
Click to expand...

Not a guess, but GISS includes Arctic temperatures while the others don't. IIRC. And the Arctic is warming faster than the world in general (as predicted decades ago, from the basic science). Arctic temperatures are to some extent estimated, but that's better than disregarding them completely, especially as events in the Arctic bear out the estimates.
 
Poptech said:
What rule prevents me from starting a topic regarding a recently released paper in the journal Nature?
What rule prevents me from responding to comments against me in topics? Apparently others can attempt to slander me but I cannot defend myself? I suppose that is the special rule here? Anyone with half a brain can see this is happening.
Click to expand...

When you decide to start a new thread for every single anti-AGW paper you can think of, that's not posting, it's spamming. And you know it.

Now, grow up, and get back on topic.
 
MattusMaximus said:
Poptech has been CHEATED!!! CHEATED I say!!!
Click to expand...
No censored, there is a difference. Do you deny my posts have been edited/moved/locked/combined? Do you deny that the posts I responded to remain intact? I realize you don't care because you have no problem with censoring people.

Matt explain to me how I am supposed to respond if all it takes if for Ben or Mac or someone else to report a post and have it censored? You want a discussion but appear not care if I have the ability to do so.
 
Last edited:
Poptech said:
No censored, there is a difference. Do you deny my posts have been edited/moved/locked/combined? Do you deny that the posts I responded to remain intact? I realize you don't care because you have no problem with censoring people.

Matt explain to me how I am supposed to respond if all it takes if for Ben or Mac or someone else to report a post and have it censored? You want a discussion but appear not care if I have the ability to do so.
Click to expand...

Back on topic, please. Answer my question/challenge which you've been dodging for roughly 3 or 4 threads and two weeks, please.

Or how about addressing Wowbag's excellent question?
 
Improbable Joe said:
I if you have already claimed a massive conspiracy based on paranoid delusions. That pretty much trumps every other possible argument.
Click to expand...
You don't even make any sense. FYI some of my comment from this thread have been edited/moved so you are not getting all of the discussion.

Wowbagger said:
If you can't answer that, then all you have are pointless complaints.
Click to expand...
Having you replies and comments censored is pointless? How so?
 
Poptech said:
You don't even make any sense. FYI some of my comment from this thread have been edited/moved so you are not getting all of the discussion.

Having you replies and comments censored is pointless? How so?
Click to expand...

Back on topic, please!
 
Poptech said:
What rule prevents me from starting a topic regarding a recently released paper in the journal Nature?

What rule prevents me from responding to comments against me in topics? Apparently others can attempt to slander me but I cannot defend myself? I suppose that is the special rule here? Anyone with half a brain can see this is happening.
Click to expand...

It's certainly what you see happening. Make of that what you will.

We see you thread-hopping like a demented sand-fly and whining when you're called on it. But I'll probably get told off for saying so. Life's a bitch, but waddyagonnado?
 
The topic is still the validity of computer models in general, right? Not believing in "Virtual Reality" and all that.

So, do you, Poptech, ever use forecasts derived from economic computer models to guide your investments or other business decisions? Do any businesses you work for, invest in, consult with, or contract with use them? Or do you only deal with companies that derive their business plans from laboratory tests?

If you're okay with paying attention to economic computer models, is that because all their predictions are always accurate? Do you have your own global economy that you can test them against?

In short, is your attitude regarding use of economic computer models to inform personal and corporate business decisions consistent with your attitude regarding use of climate models to inform public policy decisions?

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
Last edited:
Poptech said:
I've answered it! Go look or is the reply gone?

What part of my comments get edited/deleted/moved do you NOT understand?
Click to expand...

If you'd bother looking, I actually included your responses in my post challenging you, so no they have not been censored. They were just lame responses, obvious attempts to shift the goalposts.

Click the link, PT. Anyone who does so can see your quotes as well as links to the original posts. And they can also see my challenge to you, which you refuse to answer. In fact, you're going beyond moving the goalposts now - you're actually claiming that you answered my question (when anyone following the link sees that you haven't) but that the moderators are erasing/censoring your answer. Wow :rolleyes:

There is no censorship here except that which you've cooked up in your conspiracy-driven mind.
 
Poptech said:
You don't even make any sense. FYI some of my comment from this thread have been edited/moved so you are not getting all of the discussion.
Click to expand...

Right... everything I posted that proves you wrong beyond a shadow of a doubt was also edited/moved. You lose! :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom